竞争战略会影响运营资本管理效率吗?

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Process Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1108/bpmj-12-2023-0953
Ahmed Mohamed Habib, Guo-liang Yang, Yuan Cui
{"title":"竞争战略会影响运营资本管理效率吗?","authors":"Ahmed Mohamed Habib, Guo-liang Yang, Yuan Cui","doi":"10.1108/bpmj-12-2023-0953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study examines the effects of CLS and DS on companies' WCME and analyses the differences in WCME at company and market levels.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study adopts the DEA approach, regression, differences, and additional analyses to achieve its objectives. This study employs 235 non-financial companies and 1,175 company-year observations from eight active industries in the United States from 2016 to 2020.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings indicate that CLS and DS strategies positively influence companies' WCME. Additionally, WCME differed across size categories and industries, with large companies and those operating in the communication services industry showing better WCME. By contrast, WCME did not differ between the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study scrutinizes the impact of CLS and DS strategies on companies' WCME to bridge the gap in this field. It extends the investigation of competitive strategies as explanatory variables for a company's WCME and examines the differences in companies' WCME at the company and market levels, which may assist decision-makers in improving their strategies and efficiencies for continuous improvement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study enhances current knowledge by uncovering the influence of CLS and DS strategies on improving companies' WCME, an underexplored topic. It also explores companies' WCME trends and patterns regarding company size, industry type, and the pandemic period to draw interesting conclusions about the essence of WCME.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47964,"journal":{"name":"Business Process Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do competitive strategies affect working capital management efficiency?\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Mohamed Habib, Guo-liang Yang, Yuan Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bpmj-12-2023-0953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study examines the effects of CLS and DS on companies' WCME and analyses the differences in WCME at company and market levels.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study adopts the DEA approach, regression, differences, and additional analyses to achieve its objectives. This study employs 235 non-financial companies and 1,175 company-year observations from eight active industries in the United States from 2016 to 2020.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings indicate that CLS and DS strategies positively influence companies' WCME. Additionally, WCME differed across size categories and industries, with large companies and those operating in the communication services industry showing better WCME. By contrast, WCME did not differ between the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This study scrutinizes the impact of CLS and DS strategies on companies' WCME to bridge the gap in this field. It extends the investigation of competitive strategies as explanatory variables for a company's WCME and examines the differences in companies' WCME at the company and market levels, which may assist decision-makers in improving their strategies and efficiencies for continuous improvement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study enhances current knowledge by uncovering the influence of CLS and DS strategies on improving companies' WCME, an underexplored topic. It also explores companies' WCME trends and patterns regarding company size, industry type, and the pandemic period to draw interesting conclusions about the essence of WCME.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-12-2023-0953\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Process Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-12-2023-0953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究探讨了CLS和DS对公司WCME的影响,并分析了公司和市场层面WCME的差异。本研究采用了 235 家非金融公司和 1 175 个公司年观测值,这些观测值来自 2016 年至 2020 年美国八个活跃行业。研究结果研究结果表明,CLS 和 DS 战略对公司的 WCME 有积极影响。此外,不同规模类别和行业的 WCME 存在差异,大型公司和通信服务行业的公司表现出更好的 WCME。相比之下,COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的 WCME 并无不同。它扩展了将竞争战略作为公司 WCME 解释变量的研究,并探讨了公司和市场层面上公司 WCME 的差异,这可能有助于决策者改进其战略和效率,从而实现持续改进。本研究还探讨了公司的 WCME 趋势以及与公司规模、行业类型和大流行时期相关的模式,从而就 WCME 的本质得出了有趣的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do competitive strategies affect working capital management efficiency?

Purpose

This study examines the effects of CLS and DS on companies' WCME and analyses the differences in WCME at company and market levels.

Design/methodology/approach

This study adopts the DEA approach, regression, differences, and additional analyses to achieve its objectives. This study employs 235 non-financial companies and 1,175 company-year observations from eight active industries in the United States from 2016 to 2020.

Findings

The findings indicate that CLS and DS strategies positively influence companies' WCME. Additionally, WCME differed across size categories and industries, with large companies and those operating in the communication services industry showing better WCME. By contrast, WCME did not differ between the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Practical implications

This study scrutinizes the impact of CLS and DS strategies on companies' WCME to bridge the gap in this field. It extends the investigation of competitive strategies as explanatory variables for a company's WCME and examines the differences in companies' WCME at the company and market levels, which may assist decision-makers in improving their strategies and efficiencies for continuous improvement.

Originality/value

This study enhances current knowledge by uncovering the influence of CLS and DS strategies on improving companies' WCME, an underexplored topic. It also explores companies' WCME trends and patterns regarding company size, industry type, and the pandemic period to draw interesting conclusions about the essence of WCME.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Business processes are a fundamental building block of organizational success. Even though effectively managing business process is a key activity for business prosperity, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how to drive efficiency through a process approach. Building a clear and deep understanding of the range process, how they function, and how to manage them is the major challenge facing modern business. Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success. BPMJ builds a deep appreciation of how to manage business processes effectively by disseminating best practice. Coverage includes: BPM in eBusiness, eCommerce and eGovernment Web-based enterprise application integration eBPM, ERP, CRM, ASP & SCM Knowledge management and learning organization Methodologies, techniques and tools of business process modeling, analysis and design Techniques of moving from one-shot business process re-engineering to continuous improvement Best practices in BPM Performance management Tools and techniques of change management BPM case studies.
期刊最新文献
Research on the evaluation and enhancement strategies of manufacturing clustered supply chain synergies Big data analytics adoption success: value chain process-level perspective A holistic empirical approach to marketing activities and performance interaction in banking industry: the mediating role of customer-based brand equity Managing supply chain disruptions in pharmaceutical distribution: the roles of disruption orientation and mitigation strategies SME supply chain resilience in disruptive times: the effects of supply chain robustness, access to government assistance and disruption intensity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1