全球海洋生物碳泵的观测和数值模拟制约因素

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Global Biogeochemical Cycles Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1029/2024GB008156
Scott C. Doney, Kayla A. Mitchell, Stephanie A. Henson, Emma Cavan, Tim DeVries, Nicolas Gruber, Judith Hauck, Colleen B. Mouw, Jens D. Müller, Francois W. Primeau
{"title":"全球海洋生物碳泵的观测和数值模拟制约因素","authors":"Scott C. Doney,&nbsp;Kayla A. Mitchell,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Henson,&nbsp;Emma Cavan,&nbsp;Tim DeVries,&nbsp;Nicolas Gruber,&nbsp;Judith Hauck,&nbsp;Colleen B. Mouw,&nbsp;Jens D. Müller,&nbsp;Francois W. Primeau","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study characterized ocean biological carbon pump metrics in the second iteration of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP2) project. The analysis here focused on comparisons of global and biome-scale regional patterns in particulate organic carbon (POC) production and sinking flux from the RECCAP2 ocean biogeochemical model ensemble against observational products derived from satellite remote sensing, sediment traps, and geochemical methods. There was generally good model-data agreement in mean large-scale spatial patterns, but with substantial spread across the model ensemble and observational products. The global-integrated, model ensemble-mean export production, taken as the sinking POC flux at 100 m (6.08 ± 1.17 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>), and export ratio defined as sinking flux divided by net primary production (0.154 ± 0.026) both fell at the lower end of observational estimates. Comparison with observational constraints also suggested that the model ensemble may have underestimated regional biological CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown and air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux in high productivity regions. Reasonable model-data agreement was found for global-integrated, ensemble-mean sinking POC flux into the deep ocean at 1,000 m (0.65 ± 0.24 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>) and the transfer efficiency defined as flux at 1,000 m divided by flux at 100 m (0.122 ± 0.041), with both variables exhibiting considerable regional variability. The RECCAP2 analysis presents standard ocean biological carbon pump metrics for assessing biogeochemical model skill, metrics that are crucial for further modeling efforts to resolve remaining uncertainties involving system-level interactions between ocean physics and biogeochemistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"38 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008156","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational and Numerical Modeling Constraints on the Global Ocean Biological Carbon Pump\",\"authors\":\"Scott C. Doney,&nbsp;Kayla A. Mitchell,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Henson,&nbsp;Emma Cavan,&nbsp;Tim DeVries,&nbsp;Nicolas Gruber,&nbsp;Judith Hauck,&nbsp;Colleen B. Mouw,&nbsp;Jens D. Müller,&nbsp;Francois W. Primeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GB008156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study characterized ocean biological carbon pump metrics in the second iteration of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP2) project. The analysis here focused on comparisons of global and biome-scale regional patterns in particulate organic carbon (POC) production and sinking flux from the RECCAP2 ocean biogeochemical model ensemble against observational products derived from satellite remote sensing, sediment traps, and geochemical methods. There was generally good model-data agreement in mean large-scale spatial patterns, but with substantial spread across the model ensemble and observational products. The global-integrated, model ensemble-mean export production, taken as the sinking POC flux at 100 m (6.08 ± 1.17 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>), and export ratio defined as sinking flux divided by net primary production (0.154 ± 0.026) both fell at the lower end of observational estimates. Comparison with observational constraints also suggested that the model ensemble may have underestimated regional biological CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown and air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux in high productivity regions. Reasonable model-data agreement was found for global-integrated, ensemble-mean sinking POC flux into the deep ocean at 1,000 m (0.65 ± 0.24 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>) and the transfer efficiency defined as flux at 1,000 m divided by flux at 100 m (0.122 ± 0.041), with both variables exhibiting considerable regional variability. The RECCAP2 analysis presents standard ocean biological carbon pump metrics for assessing biogeochemical model skill, metrics that are crucial for further modeling efforts to resolve remaining uncertainties involving system-level interactions between ocean physics and biogeochemistry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"volume\":\"38 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008156\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008156\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究描述了区域碳循环评估与过程(RECCAP2)项目第二阶段的海洋生物碳泵指标。分析的重点是比较 RECCAP2 海洋生物地球化学模式组合与卫星遥感、沉积物捕集器和地球化学方法得出的观测结果之间的全球和生物尺度区域颗粒有机碳(POC)生成和下沉通量模式。在平均大尺度空间模式方面,模式与数据的一致性总体良好,但在模式集合和观测产品之间存在很大差异。作为 100 米处下沉的 POC 通量(6.08 ± 1.17 Pg C yr-1)的全球综合模式集合平均出口量和作为下沉通量除以净初级生产量的出口比(0.154 ± 0.026)均位于观测估计值的下限。与观测数据的比较还表明,模式集合可能低估了高生产力地区的区域生物二氧化碳吸收量和海气二氧化碳通量。在全球综合、集合平均沉入 1000 米深海的 POC 通量(0.65 ± 0.24 Pg C yr-1)和定义为 1000 米通量除以 100 米通量的转移效率(0.122 ± 0.041)方面,发现模型与数据有合理的一致性,但这两个变量都表现出相当大的区域变异性。RECCAP2 分析提出了用于评估生物地球化学模式技能的标准海洋生物碳泵指标,这些指标对于进一步建模以解决涉及海洋物理和生物地球化学之间系统级相互作用的剩余不确定性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observational and Numerical Modeling Constraints on the Global Ocean Biological Carbon Pump

This study characterized ocean biological carbon pump metrics in the second iteration of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP2) project. The analysis here focused on comparisons of global and biome-scale regional patterns in particulate organic carbon (POC) production and sinking flux from the RECCAP2 ocean biogeochemical model ensemble against observational products derived from satellite remote sensing, sediment traps, and geochemical methods. There was generally good model-data agreement in mean large-scale spatial patterns, but with substantial spread across the model ensemble and observational products. The global-integrated, model ensemble-mean export production, taken as the sinking POC flux at 100 m (6.08 ± 1.17 Pg C yr−1), and export ratio defined as sinking flux divided by net primary production (0.154 ± 0.026) both fell at the lower end of observational estimates. Comparison with observational constraints also suggested that the model ensemble may have underestimated regional biological CO2 drawdown and air-sea CO2 flux in high productivity regions. Reasonable model-data agreement was found for global-integrated, ensemble-mean sinking POC flux into the deep ocean at 1,000 m (0.65 ± 0.24 Pg C yr−1) and the transfer efficiency defined as flux at 1,000 m divided by flux at 100 m (0.122 ± 0.041), with both variables exhibiting considerable regional variability. The RECCAP2 analysis presents standard ocean biological carbon pump metrics for assessing biogeochemical model skill, metrics that are crucial for further modeling efforts to resolve remaining uncertainties involving system-level interactions between ocean physics and biogeochemistry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
期刊最新文献
Organic Coatings Reduce Dissolution Rate by an Order of Magnitude for Carbonate Minerals Produced by Marine Fish 210Po and 210Pb Distributions Along the GEOTRACES Pacific Meridional Transect (GP15): Tracers of Scavenging and Particulate Organic Carbon (POC) Export Extreme Climate as the Primary Control of Global Soil Organic Carbon Across Spatial Scales A Comprehensive Analysis of Air-Sea CO2 Flux Uncertainties Constructed From Surface Ocean Data Products Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1