数字旅游解说内容的质量:人工智能生成的内容与专业人员生成的内容之间的比较

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Tourism Management Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101279
Jiahua Jarrett Zhang , Ying Wendy Wang , Qian Ruan , Yang Yang
{"title":"数字旅游解说内容的质量:人工智能生成的内容与专业人员生成的内容之间的比较","authors":"Jiahua Jarrett Zhang ,&nbsp;Ying Wendy Wang ,&nbsp;Qian Ruan ,&nbsp;Yang Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emerging digital tourism interpretations give rise to a novel intermediary for delivering interpretation in the form of professional-generated content (PGC) or artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC). The pressing inquiry is whether artificial intelligence can surpass professional interpreters in terms of interpretation content quality, and if so, which specific dimensions it excels in. This study used a mixed-method approach encompassing grounded theory and content analysis. Grounded research, based on a pioneering digital tourism interpretation platform in China, unveiled three dimensions of content quality in digital tourism interpretation: <em>informativeness</em>, <em>emotional appeal</em>, and <em>empathy</em>. Furthermore, content analysis and ANOVA indicated that AIGC demonstrates comparatively lower levels of content quality than PGC across all three dimensions. These conclusions affirm that, regarding interpretation content quality, AI cannot replace human professional interpreters; however, considering AI's superior efficiency in generating interpretation content, the potential for human-machine collaboration in digital tourism interpretations is suggested.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48141,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Management Perspectives","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101279"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital tourism interpretation content quality: A comparison between AI-generated content and professional-generated content\",\"authors\":\"Jiahua Jarrett Zhang ,&nbsp;Ying Wendy Wang ,&nbsp;Qian Ruan ,&nbsp;Yang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The emerging digital tourism interpretations give rise to a novel intermediary for delivering interpretation in the form of professional-generated content (PGC) or artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC). The pressing inquiry is whether artificial intelligence can surpass professional interpreters in terms of interpretation content quality, and if so, which specific dimensions it excels in. This study used a mixed-method approach encompassing grounded theory and content analysis. Grounded research, based on a pioneering digital tourism interpretation platform in China, unveiled three dimensions of content quality in digital tourism interpretation: <em>informativeness</em>, <em>emotional appeal</em>, and <em>empathy</em>. Furthermore, content analysis and ANOVA indicated that AIGC demonstrates comparatively lower levels of content quality than PGC across all three dimensions. These conclusions affirm that, regarding interpretation content quality, AI cannot replace human professional interpreters; however, considering AI's superior efficiency in generating interpretation content, the potential for human-machine collaboration in digital tourism interpretations is suggested.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tourism Management Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tourism Management Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221197362400062X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221197362400062X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新兴的数字旅游口译以专业生成内容(PGC)或人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的形式为口译提供了一种新的中介。亟待解决的问题是,人工智能能否在口译内容质量方面超越专业口译员,如果能,人工智能在哪些具体方面表现出色。本研究采用了包括基础理论和内容分析在内的混合方法。基于中国领先的数字旅游口译平台的基础研究揭示了数字旅游口译内容质量的三个维度:信息量、情感吸引力和同理心。此外,内容分析和方差分析表明,在所有三个维度上,AIGC 的内容质量水平均低于 PGC。这些结论表明,在口译内容质量方面,人工智能无法取代人类专业口译员;但是,考虑到人工智能在生成口译内容方面的卓越效率,建议在数字旅游口译中进行人机协作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital tourism interpretation content quality: A comparison between AI-generated content and professional-generated content

The emerging digital tourism interpretations give rise to a novel intermediary for delivering interpretation in the form of professional-generated content (PGC) or artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC). The pressing inquiry is whether artificial intelligence can surpass professional interpreters in terms of interpretation content quality, and if so, which specific dimensions it excels in. This study used a mixed-method approach encompassing grounded theory and content analysis. Grounded research, based on a pioneering digital tourism interpretation platform in China, unveiled three dimensions of content quality in digital tourism interpretation: informativeness, emotional appeal, and empathy. Furthermore, content analysis and ANOVA indicated that AIGC demonstrates comparatively lower levels of content quality than PGC across all three dimensions. These conclusions affirm that, regarding interpretation content quality, AI cannot replace human professional interpreters; however, considering AI's superior efficiency in generating interpretation content, the potential for human-machine collaboration in digital tourism interpretations is suggested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
99
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Tourism Management Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the planning and management of travel and tourism. It covers topics such as tourist experiences, their consequences for communities, economies, and environments, the creation of image, the shaping of tourist experiences and perceptions, and the management of tourist organizations and destinations. The journal's editorial board consists of experienced international professionals and it shares the board with Tourism Management. The journal covers socio-cultural, technological, planning, and policy aspects of international, national, and regional tourism, as well as specific management studies. It encourages papers that introduce new research methods and critique existing ones in the context of tourism research. The journal publishes empirical research articles and high-quality review articles on important topics and emerging themes that enhance the theoretical and conceptual understanding of key areas within travel and tourism management.
期刊最新文献
The festival industry and gender inequality: The case of Edinburgh, the world's leading festival city Platform-enabled innovation adoption in the tourism sector: A case study on Booking.com Group conflict and group harmony affect future female companion travel intentions: The mediating effect of female companion travel experience Children's learning processes in family travel: A narrative review through a social cognitive lens Unlocking the helpfulness of extreme and exaggerated hotel online reviews: Consumers and brand influences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1