败血症患者急性肾损伤与凝血功能障碍和预后的关系

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S453632
Zhenyi Wang, Shimin Dong, Yanjun Qin
{"title":"败血症患者急性肾损伤与凝血功能障碍和预后的关系","authors":"Zhenyi Wang, Shimin Dong, Yanjun Qin","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S453632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between ARF and coagulopathy in patients with sepsis and to explore the prognostic value of these conditions.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The data of 271 patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy admitted from June 2021 to June 2022 were reviewed. The patients were divided into a survival group and a nonsurviving group according to patient prognosis. Independent sample t tests were utilized to compare laboratory parameters within 24 hours of admission, as well as the APACHE II and SOFA scores, between the two patient groups. According to the sepsis-associated coagulation dysfunction (SAC) grading criteria for grading, Spearman correlation analysis was used to study the relationship between blood creatinine and SAC grading and assignment scores, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox's proportional risk regression model were used to explore the factors affecting the prognosis of SAC patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman correlation analysis revealed strong associations between serum creatinine (Scr) concentration, SAC classification, and SAC score, with coefficients above 0.7. SAC classification outcomes varied significantly with severity: mild severity had a 77.6% survival rate versus 22.4% mortality; moderate severity had 21.5% survival versus 78.5% mortality; and severe cases had a 0.7% survival rate versus 99.3% mortality (P<0.01 for all). Multivariate analysis revealed significant predictors of outcome, including multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), with an OR of 2.070 (P=0.019); the SOFA score (OR=1.200, P<0.01); the international normalized ratio (INR) (OR=0.72, P=0.013); and the Scr level (OR=0.995, P<0.01). The areas under the ROC curves for the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and SAC classification were >0.8, all P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with sepsis, SAC grade 3 or a SAC score of 4 or higher is associated with poorer prognosis, and the interaction of acute kidney injury exacerbates the degree of SAC, consequently affecting prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"145-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis Patients and Coagulation Dysfunction and Prognosis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenyi Wang, Shimin Dong, Yanjun Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAEM.S453632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between ARF and coagulopathy in patients with sepsis and to explore the prognostic value of these conditions.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The data of 271 patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy admitted from June 2021 to June 2022 were reviewed. The patients were divided into a survival group and a nonsurviving group according to patient prognosis. Independent sample t tests were utilized to compare laboratory parameters within 24 hours of admission, as well as the APACHE II and SOFA scores, between the two patient groups. According to the sepsis-associated coagulation dysfunction (SAC) grading criteria for grading, Spearman correlation analysis was used to study the relationship between blood creatinine and SAC grading and assignment scores, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox's proportional risk regression model were used to explore the factors affecting the prognosis of SAC patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman correlation analysis revealed strong associations between serum creatinine (Scr) concentration, SAC classification, and SAC score, with coefficients above 0.7. SAC classification outcomes varied significantly with severity: mild severity had a 77.6% survival rate versus 22.4% mortality; moderate severity had 21.5% survival versus 78.5% mortality; and severe cases had a 0.7% survival rate versus 99.3% mortality (P<0.01 for all). Multivariate analysis revealed significant predictors of outcome, including multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), with an OR of 2.070 (P=0.019); the SOFA score (OR=1.200, P<0.01); the international normalized ratio (INR) (OR=0.72, P=0.013); and the Scr level (OR=0.995, P<0.01). The areas under the ROC curves for the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and SAC classification were >0.8, all P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with sepsis, SAC grade 3 or a SAC score of 4 or higher is associated with poorer prognosis, and the interaction of acute kidney injury exacerbates the degree of SAC, consequently affecting prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"145-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S453632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S453632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在调查脓毒症患者中ARF与凝血病之间的关系,并探讨这些情况的预后价值:回顾性分析2021年6月至2022年6月期间收治的271名脓毒症相关凝血病患者的数据。根据患者预后将其分为存活组和非存活组。采用独立样本t检验比较两组患者入院24小时内的实验室参数以及APACHE II和SOFA评分。根据脓毒症相关凝血功能障碍(SAC)分级标准进行分级,采用Spearman相关性分析研究血肌酐与SAC分级和赋分之间的关系,并采用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)和Cox比例风险回归模型探讨影响SAC患者预后的因素:结果:斯皮尔曼相关性分析显示,血清肌酐(Scr)浓度、SAC分级和SAC评分之间的相关性很强,系数均在0.7以上。SAC分级结果随严重程度的不同而有明显差异:轻度严重者的存活率为77.6%,而死亡率为22.4%;中度严重者的存活率为21.5%,而死亡率为78.5%;重度病例的存活率为0.7%,而死亡率为99.3%(P0.8,所有P均<0.05):在脓毒症患者中,SAC 3级或SAC评分4分或更高与较差的预后相关,急性肾损伤的相互作用加剧了SAC的程度,从而影响预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship Between Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis Patients and Coagulation Dysfunction and Prognosis.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between ARF and coagulopathy in patients with sepsis and to explore the prognostic value of these conditions.

Patients and methods: The data of 271 patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy admitted from June 2021 to June 2022 were reviewed. The patients were divided into a survival group and a nonsurviving group according to patient prognosis. Independent sample t tests were utilized to compare laboratory parameters within 24 hours of admission, as well as the APACHE II and SOFA scores, between the two patient groups. According to the sepsis-associated coagulation dysfunction (SAC) grading criteria for grading, Spearman correlation analysis was used to study the relationship between blood creatinine and SAC grading and assignment scores, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox's proportional risk regression model were used to explore the factors affecting the prognosis of SAC patients.

Results: Spearman correlation analysis revealed strong associations between serum creatinine (Scr) concentration, SAC classification, and SAC score, with coefficients above 0.7. SAC classification outcomes varied significantly with severity: mild severity had a 77.6% survival rate versus 22.4% mortality; moderate severity had 21.5% survival versus 78.5% mortality; and severe cases had a 0.7% survival rate versus 99.3% mortality (P<0.01 for all). Multivariate analysis revealed significant predictors of outcome, including multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), with an OR of 2.070 (P=0.019); the SOFA score (OR=1.200, P<0.01); the international normalized ratio (INR) (OR=0.72, P=0.013); and the Scr level (OR=0.995, P<0.01). The areas under the ROC curves for the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and SAC classification were >0.8, all P < 0.05.

Conclusion: In patients with sepsis, SAC grade 3 or a SAC score of 4 or higher is associated with poorer prognosis, and the interaction of acute kidney injury exacerbates the degree of SAC, consequently affecting prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Observational Study of Sexual Assaults in French Guiana During 2019-2020 [Letter]. Association of Emergency Department Length of Stay and Hospital Mortality in Patients Under Investigation for COVID-19. Utility of Common Bile Duct Identification on Biliary Ultrasound in Emergency Department Patients. Effect of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Driven vs Standard Diagnostic Pathway on 24-Hour Hospital Stay in Emergency Department Patients with Dyspnea-Protocol for A Randomized Controlled Trial. Accuracy of FAST-ED for Assessment Large Vessel Occlusion of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Emergency Department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1