Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Laura Labate, Chiara Russo Artimagnella, Cristina Marelli, Alessio Signori, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Chiara Aldieri, Alessandra Bandera, Federica Briano, Bruno Cacopardo, Alessandra Calabresi, Federico Capra Marzani, Anna Carretta, Annamaria Cattelan, Luca Ceccarelli, Giovanni Cenderello, Silvia Corcione, Andrea Cortegiani, Rosario Cultrera, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Valerio Del Bono, Filippo Del Puente, Chiara Fanelli, Fiorenza Fava, Daniela Francisci, Nicholas Geremia, Lucia Graziani, Andrea Lombardi, Angela Raffaella Losito, Ivana Maida, Andrea Marino, Maria Mazzitelli, Marco Merli, Roberta Monardo, Alessandra Mularoni, Chiara Oltolini, Carlo Pallotto, Emanuele Pontali, Francesca Raffaelli, Matteo Rinaldi, Marco Ripa, Teresa Antonia Santantonio, Francesco Saverio Serino, Michele Spinicci, Carlo Torti, Enrico Maria Trecarichi, Mario Tumbarello, Malgorzata Mikulska, Mauro Giacomini, Anna Marchese, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti
{"title":"成人患者使用头孢羟氨苄:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究的描述性分析。","authors":"Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Laura Labate, Chiara Russo Artimagnella, Cristina Marelli, Alessio Signori, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Chiara Aldieri, Alessandra Bandera, Federica Briano, Bruno Cacopardo, Alessandra Calabresi, Federico Capra Marzani, Anna Carretta, Annamaria Cattelan, Luca Ceccarelli, Giovanni Cenderello, Silvia Corcione, Andrea Cortegiani, Rosario Cultrera, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Valerio Del Bono, Filippo Del Puente, Chiara Fanelli, Fiorenza Fava, Daniela Francisci, Nicholas Geremia, Lucia Graziani, Andrea Lombardi, Angela Raffaella Losito, Ivana Maida, Andrea Marino, Maria Mazzitelli, Marco Merli, Roberta Monardo, Alessandra Mularoni, Chiara Oltolini, Carlo Pallotto, Emanuele Pontali, Francesca Raffaelli, Matteo Rinaldi, Marco Ripa, Teresa Antonia Santantonio, Francesco Saverio Serino, Michele Spinicci, Carlo Torti, Enrico Maria Trecarichi, Mario Tumbarello, Malgorzata Mikulska, Mauro Giacomini, Anna Marchese, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti","doi":"10.1007/s40121-024-01016-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11343933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Laura Labate, Chiara Russo Artimagnella, Cristina Marelli, Alessio Signori, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Chiara Aldieri, Alessandra Bandera, Federica Briano, Bruno Cacopardo, Alessandra Calabresi, Federico Capra Marzani, Anna Carretta, Annamaria Cattelan, Luca Ceccarelli, Giovanni Cenderello, Silvia Corcione, Andrea Cortegiani, Rosario Cultrera, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Valerio Del Bono, Filippo Del Puente, Chiara Fanelli, Fiorenza Fava, Daniela Francisci, Nicholas Geremia, Lucia Graziani, Andrea Lombardi, Angela Raffaella Losito, Ivana Maida, Andrea Marino, Maria Mazzitelli, Marco Merli, Roberta Monardo, Alessandra Mularoni, Chiara Oltolini, Carlo Pallotto, Emanuele Pontali, Francesca Raffaelli, Matteo Rinaldi, Marco Ripa, Teresa Antonia Santantonio, Francesco Saverio Serino, Michele Spinicci, Carlo Torti, Enrico Maria Trecarichi, Mario Tumbarello, Malgorzata Mikulska, Mauro Giacomini, Anna Marchese, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40121-024-01016-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11343933/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-01016-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-01016-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study.
Introduction: Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics.
Methods: In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics.
Results: Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively.
Conclusions: Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.
期刊介绍:
Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.