经尿道吊带手术患者同意书随机对照试验

Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001543
Veronica Demtchouk, William D Winkelman, Ronald M Cornely, Anna Modest, Michele R Hacker, Eman A Elkadry
{"title":"经尿道吊带手术患者同意书随机对照试验","authors":"Veronica Demtchouk, William D Winkelman, Ronald M Cornely, Anna Modest, Michele R Hacker, Eman A Elkadry","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Improving patients' recall and understanding of their planned surgery is essential for fully informed consent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess if the addition of an information handout to the standard preoperative consent process for the transobturator midurethral sling procedure improved patient understanding, recall, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a randomized controlled trial of adult women undergoing a transobturator midurethral sling procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. After standard counseling, participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the intervention group, with the latter receiving an extra informational handout detailing surgical information. Before surgery, all participants filled out a questionnaire assessing key points discussed during the surgical consent, which was used to calculate a knowledge score, the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included perception of the consent process and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 98 randomized participants (50 control, 48 intervention), knowledge scores were 43% for controls and 57% for the intervention group (P = 0.015). Despite low scores, high self-rated understanding and satisfaction were noted across both groups (78% control, 71% intervention, P = 0.4). Notably, younger individuals, those with some college education, and patients undergoing additional prolapse surgery benefited most from the handout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The informational handout improved knowledge scores, though overall knowledge scores were low in both groups. High satisfaction and perceived understanding of the planned procedure persisted, but the addition of a handout was not associated with a significant difference in knowledge scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Consent for Patients Undergoing Transobturator Slings.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Demtchouk, William D Winkelman, Ronald M Cornely, Anna Modest, Michele R Hacker, Eman A Elkadry\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Improving patients' recall and understanding of their planned surgery is essential for fully informed consent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess if the addition of an information handout to the standard preoperative consent process for the transobturator midurethral sling procedure improved patient understanding, recall, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a randomized controlled trial of adult women undergoing a transobturator midurethral sling procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. After standard counseling, participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the intervention group, with the latter receiving an extra informational handout detailing surgical information. Before surgery, all participants filled out a questionnaire assessing key points discussed during the surgical consent, which was used to calculate a knowledge score, the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included perception of the consent process and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 98 randomized participants (50 control, 48 intervention), knowledge scores were 43% for controls and 57% for the intervention group (P = 0.015). Despite low scores, high self-rated understanding and satisfaction were noted across both groups (78% control, 71% intervention, P = 0.4). Notably, younger individuals, those with some college education, and patients undergoing additional prolapse surgery benefited most from the handout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The informational handout improved knowledge scores, though overall knowledge scores were low in both groups. High satisfaction and perceived understanding of the planned procedure persisted, but the addition of a handout was not associated with a significant difference in knowledge scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:提高患者对其手术计划的回忆和理解是获得完全知情同意的关键:本研究的目的是评估在经尿道中段吊带术的标准术前同意程序中添加信息手册是否能提高患者的理解、回忆和满意度:这是一项随机对照试验,对象是接受经尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的成年女性。在接受标准咨询后,参与者被随机分配到对照组或干预组,后者会收到一份额外的信息手册,详细介绍手术信息。手术前,所有参与者都填写了一份调查问卷,评估手术同意过程中讨论的关键点,并以此计算知识得分,这就是主要终点。次要结果包括对同意过程的感知和患者满意度:在 98 名随机参与者(50 名对照组,48 名干预组)中,对照组的知识得分率为 43%,干预组为 57%(P = 0.015)。尽管得分较低,但两组的自评理解度和满意度都很高(对照组 78%,干预组 71%,P = 0.4)。值得注意的是,年轻人、受过一定大学教育的人以及接受过其他脱垂手术的患者从宣传手册中获益最多:结论:虽然两组患者的总体知识得分都很低,但宣传手册提高了知识得分。对计划手术的高满意度和感知理解度依然存在,但增加宣传手册与知识得分的显著差异无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Consent for Patients Undergoing Transobturator Slings.

Importance: Improving patients' recall and understanding of their planned surgery is essential for fully informed consent.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess if the addition of an information handout to the standard preoperative consent process for the transobturator midurethral sling procedure improved patient understanding, recall, and satisfaction.

Study design: This is a randomized controlled trial of adult women undergoing a transobturator midurethral sling procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. After standard counseling, participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the intervention group, with the latter receiving an extra informational handout detailing surgical information. Before surgery, all participants filled out a questionnaire assessing key points discussed during the surgical consent, which was used to calculate a knowledge score, the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included perception of the consent process and patient satisfaction.

Results: Of 98 randomized participants (50 control, 48 intervention), knowledge scores were 43% for controls and 57% for the intervention group (P = 0.015). Despite low scores, high self-rated understanding and satisfaction were noted across both groups (78% control, 71% intervention, P = 0.4). Notably, younger individuals, those with some college education, and patients undergoing additional prolapse surgery benefited most from the handout.

Conclusions: The informational handout improved knowledge scores, though overall knowledge scores were low in both groups. High satisfaction and perceived understanding of the planned procedure persisted, but the addition of a handout was not associated with a significant difference in knowledge scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1