跨界使用信息和通信技术--对现有文献的范围审查和未来研究路线图

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100444
Wendy Nilsen , Tanja Nordberg , Ida Drange , Nina Maureen Junker , Siri Yde Aksnes , Amanda Cooklin , Eunae Cho , Laurence Marie Anna Habib , Stacey Hokke , Julie B. Olson-Buchanan , Vilde Hoff Bernstrøm
{"title":"跨界使用信息和通信技术--对现有文献的范围审查和未来研究路线图","authors":"Wendy Nilsen ,&nbsp;Tanja Nordberg ,&nbsp;Ida Drange ,&nbsp;Nina Maureen Junker ,&nbsp;Siri Yde Aksnes ,&nbsp;Amanda Cooklin ,&nbsp;Eunae Cho ,&nbsp;Laurence Marie Anna Habib ,&nbsp;Stacey Hokke ,&nbsp;Julie B. Olson-Buchanan ,&nbsp;Vilde Hoff Bernstrøm","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on the use of digital devices to conduct tasks across work and non-work domains (i.e., boundary-crossing ICT use) grows rapidly. To gain an overview of this expanding field, we conducted a systematic search in 14 databases (e.g., WoS, PsycINFO) for studies examining the outcomes of performing 1) work-related tasks during non-work time and 2) non-work tasks during work time. After screening 17,388 abstracts, 398 were read in full text, and 159 publications were included. Most studies used cross-sectional interviews or self-report survey data of employees in high-income countries. The work-family interface, individual work and health outcomes were commonly studied, while family and organizational outcomes received little attention. Moreover, research with a multilevel perspective and studies examining objective outcomes (e.g., divorce, sick leave) were scarce and the performance of non-work tasks during work time was often ignored. Despite the burgeoning literature, there is an urgent need to arrive at a common conceptualization and operationalization of boundary-crossing ICT use to be able to compare findings across studies and disciplines. We suggest a new definition and future agenda to contribute to a deeper understanding of the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000770/pdfft?md5=d29e6b9fca519793a1cc7cf083f7a57a&pid=1-s2.0-S2451958824000770-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boundary-crossing ICT use – A scoping review of the current literature and a road map for future research\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Nilsen ,&nbsp;Tanja Nordberg ,&nbsp;Ida Drange ,&nbsp;Nina Maureen Junker ,&nbsp;Siri Yde Aksnes ,&nbsp;Amanda Cooklin ,&nbsp;Eunae Cho ,&nbsp;Laurence Marie Anna Habib ,&nbsp;Stacey Hokke ,&nbsp;Julie B. Olson-Buchanan ,&nbsp;Vilde Hoff Bernstrøm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research on the use of digital devices to conduct tasks across work and non-work domains (i.e., boundary-crossing ICT use) grows rapidly. To gain an overview of this expanding field, we conducted a systematic search in 14 databases (e.g., WoS, PsycINFO) for studies examining the outcomes of performing 1) work-related tasks during non-work time and 2) non-work tasks during work time. After screening 17,388 abstracts, 398 were read in full text, and 159 publications were included. Most studies used cross-sectional interviews or self-report survey data of employees in high-income countries. The work-family interface, individual work and health outcomes were commonly studied, while family and organizational outcomes received little attention. Moreover, research with a multilevel perspective and studies examining objective outcomes (e.g., divorce, sick leave) were scarce and the performance of non-work tasks during work time was often ignored. Despite the burgeoning literature, there is an urgent need to arrive at a common conceptualization and operationalization of boundary-crossing ICT use to be able to compare findings across studies and disciplines. We suggest a new definition and future agenda to contribute to a deeper understanding of the field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000770/pdfft?md5=d29e6b9fca519793a1cc7cf083f7a57a&pid=1-s2.0-S2451958824000770-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824000770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关使用数字设备完成跨工作和非工作领域任务(即跨界使用信息和通信技术)的研究发展迅速。为了了解这一不断扩大的领域的概况,我们在 14 个数据库(如 WoS、PsycINFO)中进行了系统性检索,研究了在非工作时间执行 1) 工作相关任务和 2) 工作时间执行非工作任务的结果。在筛选了 17,388 篇摘要后,对 398 篇进行了全文阅读,共纳入 159 篇出版物。大多数研究采用的是对高收入国家员工的横截面访谈或自我报告调查数据。对工作与家庭的关系、个人工作和健康结果的研究很普遍,而对家庭和组织结果的研究则很少。此外,采用多层次视角的研究和对客观结果(如离婚、病假)的研究也很少,工作期间非工作任务的执行情况往往被忽视。尽管相关文献不断涌现,但仍迫切需要对跨界使用信息和通信技术进行统一的概念化和操作化,以便对不同研究和学科的结果进行比较。我们提出了一个新的定义和未来议程,以帮助加深对该领域的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boundary-crossing ICT use – A scoping review of the current literature and a road map for future research

Research on the use of digital devices to conduct tasks across work and non-work domains (i.e., boundary-crossing ICT use) grows rapidly. To gain an overview of this expanding field, we conducted a systematic search in 14 databases (e.g., WoS, PsycINFO) for studies examining the outcomes of performing 1) work-related tasks during non-work time and 2) non-work tasks during work time. After screening 17,388 abstracts, 398 were read in full text, and 159 publications were included. Most studies used cross-sectional interviews or self-report survey data of employees in high-income countries. The work-family interface, individual work and health outcomes were commonly studied, while family and organizational outcomes received little attention. Moreover, research with a multilevel perspective and studies examining objective outcomes (e.g., divorce, sick leave) were scarce and the performance of non-work tasks during work time was often ignored. Despite the burgeoning literature, there is an urgent need to arrive at a common conceptualization and operationalization of boundary-crossing ICT use to be able to compare findings across studies and disciplines. We suggest a new definition and future agenda to contribute to a deeper understanding of the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between regulatory processes and problematic social media use: A systematic review Virtual reality based executive function training in schools: The experience of primary school-aged children, teachers and training teaching assistants Trust and distrust coexistence and change in the adoption of an emerging technology in organizations Computer use and cardiovascular risk biomarkers in midlife and older adults Global research trends on cyberbullying: A bibliometric study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1