高强度聚焦超声联合促性腺激素释放激素激动剂或联合左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统治疗子宫腺肌症的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2024.01.036
Yi-Liang Lee , Yin-Shiuan Bai , Mu-Hsien Yu , Fung-Wei Chang , Yu-Chi Wang , Kai-Jo Chiang , Gwo-Jang Wu , Chang-Sheng Yin
{"title":"高强度聚焦超声联合促性腺激素释放激素激动剂或联合左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统治疗子宫腺肌症的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Yi-Liang Lee ,&nbsp;Yin-Shiuan Bai ,&nbsp;Mu-Hsien Yu ,&nbsp;Fung-Wei Chang ,&nbsp;Yu-Chi Wang ,&nbsp;Kai-Jo Chiang ,&nbsp;Gwo-Jang Wu ,&nbsp;Chang-Sheng Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.tjog.2024.01.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are conventional conservative treatments for adenomyosis, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel ablation technique. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HIFU combined with GnRH-a or LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients.</p><p>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2021. Published studies comparing HIFU plus GnRH-a with HIFU plus LNG-IUS in adenomyosis patients were assessed for eligibility by two independent authors. Risk of bias tool was utilized for risk evaluation. We selected treatment effective rate of dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as the primary outcome; effective rate of menorrhagia severity and reduction rate of adenomyotic lesion as the secondary outcomes. Adverse effects were assessed.</p><p>Four studies with a total 729 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. HIFU plus LNG-IUS showed lower dysmenorrhea [within 6 months: risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.93, p &lt; 0.00001; over 1 year: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65–0.82, p &lt; 0.00001] and less menorrhagia severity (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60–0.66, p &lt; 0.00001) than HIFU plus GnRH-a. Both groups demonstrated equal efficacy in adenomyotic lesion reduction rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97–1.09, p = 0.30). Adverse effects happened equally in both groups.</p><p>Combination therapy of HIFU and LNG-IUS revealed better effectiveness in treating dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia than that of HIFU and GnRH-a. However, interpreting the conclusion should be approached with caution as a result of significant heterogeneity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49449,"journal":{"name":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001244/pdfft?md5=e910139259980293f3a92c044f904167&pid=1-s2.0-S1028455924001244-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Liang Lee ,&nbsp;Yin-Shiuan Bai ,&nbsp;Mu-Hsien Yu ,&nbsp;Fung-Wei Chang ,&nbsp;Yu-Chi Wang ,&nbsp;Kai-Jo Chiang ,&nbsp;Gwo-Jang Wu ,&nbsp;Chang-Sheng Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjog.2024.01.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are conventional conservative treatments for adenomyosis, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel ablation technique. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HIFU combined with GnRH-a or LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients.</p><p>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2021. Published studies comparing HIFU plus GnRH-a with HIFU plus LNG-IUS in adenomyosis patients were assessed for eligibility by two independent authors. Risk of bias tool was utilized for risk evaluation. We selected treatment effective rate of dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as the primary outcome; effective rate of menorrhagia severity and reduction rate of adenomyotic lesion as the secondary outcomes. Adverse effects were assessed.</p><p>Four studies with a total 729 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. HIFU plus LNG-IUS showed lower dysmenorrhea [within 6 months: risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.93, p &lt; 0.00001; over 1 year: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65–0.82, p &lt; 0.00001] and less menorrhagia severity (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60–0.66, p &lt; 0.00001) than HIFU plus GnRH-a. Both groups demonstrated equal efficacy in adenomyotic lesion reduction rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97–1.09, p = 0.30). Adverse effects happened equally in both groups.</p><p>Combination therapy of HIFU and LNG-IUS revealed better effectiveness in treating dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia than that of HIFU and GnRH-a. However, interpreting the conclusion should be approached with caution as a result of significant heterogeneity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001244/pdfft?md5=e910139259980293f3a92c044f904167&pid=1-s2.0-S1028455924001244-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)和左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统(LNG-IUS)是子宫腺肌症的传统保守疗法,而高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)是一种新型消融技术。本研究旨在探讨 HIFU 联合 GnRH-a 或 LNG-IUS 对腺肌症患者的疗效。已发表的研究对子宫腺肌症患者进行了HIFU加GnRH-a与HIFU加LNG-IUS的比较,由两位独立作者进行资格评估。使用偏倚风险工具进行风险评估。我们选择痛经(月经期间疼痛)的治疗有效率作为主要结果,月经过多严重程度的有效率和子宫腺肌症病灶的缩小率作为次要结果。荟萃分析共纳入了四项研究,共计 729 名患者。HIFU加LNG-IUS显示出较低的痛经[6个月内:风险比(RR)0.88,95%置信区间(CI)0.83-0.93,p <0.00001;1年以上:RR 0.73,95%置信区间(CI)0.83-0.93,p <0.00001]:RR0.73,95% CI0.65-0.82,p< 0.00001],月经过多严重程度(RR0.63,95% CI0.60-0.66,p< 0.00001)低于 HIFU 加 GnRH-a。两组在腺肌病变缩小率方面的疗效相同(RR 1.03,95% CI 0.97-1.09,P = 0.30)。HIFU和LNG-IUS联合疗法在治疗痛经和月经过多方面的疗效优于HIFU和GnRH-a。然而,由于存在显著的异质性,在解释结论时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are conventional conservative treatments for adenomyosis, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel ablation technique. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HIFU combined with GnRH-a or LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients.

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2021. Published studies comparing HIFU plus GnRH-a with HIFU plus LNG-IUS in adenomyosis patients were assessed for eligibility by two independent authors. Risk of bias tool was utilized for risk evaluation. We selected treatment effective rate of dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as the primary outcome; effective rate of menorrhagia severity and reduction rate of adenomyotic lesion as the secondary outcomes. Adverse effects were assessed.

Four studies with a total 729 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. HIFU plus LNG-IUS showed lower dysmenorrhea [within 6 months: risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.93, p < 0.00001; over 1 year: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65–0.82, p < 0.00001] and less menorrhagia severity (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60–0.66, p < 0.00001) than HIFU plus GnRH-a. Both groups demonstrated equal efficacy in adenomyotic lesion reduction rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97–1.09, p = 0.30). Adverse effects happened equally in both groups.

Combination therapy of HIFU and LNG-IUS revealed better effectiveness in treating dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia than that of HIFU and GnRH-a. However, interpreting the conclusion should be approached with caution as a result of significant heterogeneity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
23.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is a peer-reviewed journal and open access publishing editorials, reviews, original articles, short communications, case reports, research letters, correspondence and letters to the editor in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The aims of the journal are to: 1.Publish cutting-edge, innovative and topical research that addresses screening, diagnosis, management and care in women''s health 2.Deliver evidence-based information 3.Promote the sharing of clinical experience 4.Address women-related health promotion The journal provides comprehensive coverage of topics in obstetrics & gynecology and women''s health including maternal-fetal medicine, reproductive endocrinology/infertility, and gynecologic oncology. Taiwan Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Instructions to Authors Common on “craniorachischisis in a stillbirth associated with maternal smoking” Comment on “Loeys-Dietz syndrome with a novel in-frame SMAD3 deletion diagnosed as a result of postpartum aortic dissection” Reply to “the role of probiotics in women's health: An update narrative review”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1