中性敏捷指数建模:数学框架

M. Kavitha
{"title":"中性敏捷指数建模:数学框架","authors":"M. Kavitha","doi":"10.52783/cana.v31.833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study uses a fuzzy-based methodology that combines agility score and certainty functions to assess the values of learning mathematics quickly. The paper emphasises the need of understanding the value of learning mathematics through tools like the Neutronosophic Agility Index in addition to discussing the usage of surveys to assess it.\nObjective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the values of learning mathematics’ agility by employing a fuzzy based methodology that integrates score and certainty functions. Finding out how agile the values are now and looking into ways to make them more agile are the objectives.\nMethod: A paradigm for assessing the values of learning mathematical skills agility is established using a neutrosophic fuzzy method. The agility score is calculated to evaluate the level of agility. Additionally, the article recommends carrying out additional research using particular performance assessment standards.\nResult: The findings show that, according to its agility score, the benefit of knowing mathematics is \"fairly agile\". It implies the possibility of more progress by putting improvement recommendations into practice. It also emphasises the relationship between performance, agility, and organisational culture, underscoring the necessity for additional research employing a variety of fuzzy methodologies.\nConclusion: In conclusion, the study is represented by agility scores corresponding to specific values. Self-confidence, with an agility score of 0.5377, ranks first, indicating reasonable confidence in decision-making. Perseverance (score: 0.5356) reflects resilience and determination. Decision-making (score: 0.5239) suggests a balanced approach. Tolerance (score: 0.5185) relates to handling diversity. Higher Order Thinking (score: 0.5166) involves cognitive abilities. The average agility score (0.5265) falls within the ‘Fairly Agile’ range. Enhancing these values can lead to higher agility categories.\n","PeriodicalId":40036,"journal":{"name":"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling Neutrosophic Agility Index: A Mathematical Framework\",\"authors\":\"M. Kavitha\",\"doi\":\"10.52783/cana.v31.833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study uses a fuzzy-based methodology that combines agility score and certainty functions to assess the values of learning mathematics quickly. The paper emphasises the need of understanding the value of learning mathematics through tools like the Neutronosophic Agility Index in addition to discussing the usage of surveys to assess it.\\nObjective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the values of learning mathematics’ agility by employing a fuzzy based methodology that integrates score and certainty functions. Finding out how agile the values are now and looking into ways to make them more agile are the objectives.\\nMethod: A paradigm for assessing the values of learning mathematical skills agility is established using a neutrosophic fuzzy method. The agility score is calculated to evaluate the level of agility. Additionally, the article recommends carrying out additional research using particular performance assessment standards.\\nResult: The findings show that, according to its agility score, the benefit of knowing mathematics is \\\"fairly agile\\\". It implies the possibility of more progress by putting improvement recommendations into practice. It also emphasises the relationship between performance, agility, and organisational culture, underscoring the necessity for additional research employing a variety of fuzzy methodologies.\\nConclusion: In conclusion, the study is represented by agility scores corresponding to specific values. Self-confidence, with an agility score of 0.5377, ranks first, indicating reasonable confidence in decision-making. Perseverance (score: 0.5356) reflects resilience and determination. Decision-making (score: 0.5239) suggests a balanced approach. Tolerance (score: 0.5185) relates to handling diversity. Higher Order Thinking (score: 0.5166) involves cognitive abilities. The average agility score (0.5265) falls within the ‘Fairly Agile’ range. Enhancing these values can lead to higher agility categories.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":40036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v31.833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v31.833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究采用基于模糊的方法,结合敏捷度得分和确定性函数来评估快速学习数学的价值。本文强调了通过中子思维敏捷指数等工具了解数学学习价值的必要性,并讨论了使用调查来评估数学学习价值的方法:本研究旨在采用一种基于模糊的方法来评估数学学习的敏捷性价值,该方法综合了分数和确定性函数。找出数学学习价值观现在的敏捷程度,并寻找使其更加敏捷的方法是本研究的目标:方法:使用中性模糊方法建立了数学技能敏捷性学习价值评估范式。通过计算敏捷度得分来评价敏捷度的高低。此外,文章还建议使用特定的绩效评估标准开展更多研究:结果:研究结果表明,根据敏捷度得分,数学知识的好处是 "相当敏捷"。这意味着通过将改进建议付诸实践,有可能取得更大的进步。它还强调了绩效、敏捷性和组织文化之间的关系,突出了采用各种模糊方法进行更多研究的必要性:总之,本研究通过与特定值相对应的敏捷性得分来体现。自信心(敏捷度得分为 0.5377)排名第一,表明对决策有合理的信心。毅力(得分:0.5356)反映了韧性和决心。决策(得分:0.5239)表明了一种平衡的方法。宽容(得分:0.5185)与处理多样性有关。高阶思维(得分:0.5166)涉及认知能力。平均敏捷度得分(0.5265)属于 "相当敏捷 "范围。提高这些值可提升敏捷度类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling Neutrosophic Agility Index: A Mathematical Framework
Introduction: This study uses a fuzzy-based methodology that combines agility score and certainty functions to assess the values of learning mathematics quickly. The paper emphasises the need of understanding the value of learning mathematics through tools like the Neutronosophic Agility Index in addition to discussing the usage of surveys to assess it. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the values of learning mathematics’ agility by employing a fuzzy based methodology that integrates score and certainty functions. Finding out how agile the values are now and looking into ways to make them more agile are the objectives. Method: A paradigm for assessing the values of learning mathematical skills agility is established using a neutrosophic fuzzy method. The agility score is calculated to evaluate the level of agility. Additionally, the article recommends carrying out additional research using particular performance assessment standards. Result: The findings show that, according to its agility score, the benefit of knowing mathematics is "fairly agile". It implies the possibility of more progress by putting improvement recommendations into practice. It also emphasises the relationship between performance, agility, and organisational culture, underscoring the necessity for additional research employing a variety of fuzzy methodologies. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study is represented by agility scores corresponding to specific values. Self-confidence, with an agility score of 0.5377, ranks first, indicating reasonable confidence in decision-making. Perseverance (score: 0.5356) reflects resilience and determination. Decision-making (score: 0.5239) suggests a balanced approach. Tolerance (score: 0.5185) relates to handling diversity. Higher Order Thinking (score: 0.5166) involves cognitive abilities. The average agility score (0.5265) falls within the ‘Fairly Agile’ range. Enhancing these values can lead to higher agility categories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Comparison of Different Cluster Head Selection Techniques for Wireless Sensor Network Matthews Partial Metric Space Using F-Contraction A Common Fixed Point Result in Menger Space Some Applications via Coupled Fixed Point Theorems for (????, ????)-H-Contraction Mappings in Partial b- Metric Spaces ARRN: Leveraging Demographic Context for Improved Semantic Personalization in Hybrid Recommendation Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1