Alex T. Price , Joshua P. Schiff , Alice Silberstein , Robbie Beckert , Tianyu Zhao , Geoffrey D. Hugo , Pamela P. Samson , Eric Laugeman , Lauren E. Henke
{"title":"使用快速预计划工作流程进行无模拟腹部立体定向自适应放射治疗的可行性","authors":"Alex T. Price , Joshua P. Schiff , Alice Silberstein , Robbie Beckert , Tianyu Zhao , Geoffrey D. Hugo , Pamela P. Samson , Eric Laugeman , Lauren E. Henke","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an <em>in silico</em> study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient’s target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm<sup>3</sup> between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was −0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, −5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000812/pdfft?md5=fb856b62ebccaf8ffa345fd98e38c826&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000812-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow\",\"authors\":\"Alex T. Price , Joshua P. Schiff , Alice Silberstein , Robbie Beckert , Tianyu Zhao , Geoffrey D. Hugo , Pamela P. Samson , Eric Laugeman , Lauren E. Henke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an <em>in silico</em> study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient’s target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm<sup>3</sup> between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was −0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, −5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000812/pdfft?md5=fb856b62ebccaf8ffa345fd98e38c826&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000812-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow
Background and Purpose
Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an in silico study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).
Materials and Methods
Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient’s target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.
Results
The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm3 between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was −0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, −5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.
Conclusion
The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.