优化单囊胚选择:第 3 天胚胎形态在玻璃化温育囊胚移植周期中的作用

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive biomedicine online Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104364
Yu Xiao , Ping Zhang , Li Wang , Yiling Ko , Min Wang , Ji Xi , Chengliang Zhou , Xiaojun Chen
{"title":"优化单囊胚选择:第 3 天胚胎形态在玻璃化温育囊胚移植周期中的作用","authors":"Yu Xiao ,&nbsp;Ping Zhang ,&nbsp;Li Wang ,&nbsp;Yiling Ko ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Ji Xi ,&nbsp;Chengliang Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Can day 3 embryo morphology serve as an independent criterion for optimal single blastocyst selection?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This retrospective, single-centre cohort study included 1517 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) cycles conducted between October 2019 and July 2022. The live birth rate (LBR) and other clinical outcomes of SVBT cycles were evaluated, considering both good-quality and non-good-quality day 3 embryos. The associations of day 3 morphological characteristics, encompassing number of blastomeres and embryo grade, were assessed. Multivariable analyses were undertaken using multiple models adjusted for day of blastocyst development and blastocyst grade.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Blastocysts from good-quality day 3 embryos had significantly higher LBR compared with those from non-good-quality embryos for both day 5 (51.5% versus 42.9%; <em>P</em> = 0.013) and day 6 (25.1% versus 17.6%; <em>P</em> = 0.018) blastocysts. LBR did not differ significantly with number of blastomeres on day 3, regardless of day of blastocyst development (day 5/6) or blastocyst grade. LBR varied significantly by day 3 embryo grade for both day 5 (48.0%, 51.5%, 46.6% and 32.7% for grades I, II, III and IV–V; <em>P</em> = 0.005) and day 6 (41.5%, 23.6%, 15.9% and 16.1% for grades I, II, III and IV–V; <em>P</em> = 0.001) blastocysts. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that non-good-quality embryos and lower morphological grade (IV–V) on day 3 were significantly and negatively correlated with LBR, while the number of blastomeres on day 3 was not an independent factor.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When selecting blastocysts of equal quality for SVBT cycles, those with higher day 3 morphological scores are preferred. Day 3 morphological evaluation is a valuable supplement to conventional selection methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing single blastocyst selection: the role of day 3 embryo morphology in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles\",\"authors\":\"Yu Xiao ,&nbsp;Ping Zhang ,&nbsp;Li Wang ,&nbsp;Yiling Ko ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Ji Xi ,&nbsp;Chengliang Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Can day 3 embryo morphology serve as an independent criterion for optimal single blastocyst selection?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This retrospective, single-centre cohort study included 1517 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) cycles conducted between October 2019 and July 2022. The live birth rate (LBR) and other clinical outcomes of SVBT cycles were evaluated, considering both good-quality and non-good-quality day 3 embryos. The associations of day 3 morphological characteristics, encompassing number of blastomeres and embryo grade, were assessed. Multivariable analyses were undertaken using multiple models adjusted for day of blastocyst development and blastocyst grade.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Blastocysts from good-quality day 3 embryos had significantly higher LBR compared with those from non-good-quality embryos for both day 5 (51.5% versus 42.9%; <em>P</em> = 0.013) and day 6 (25.1% versus 17.6%; <em>P</em> = 0.018) blastocysts. LBR did not differ significantly with number of blastomeres on day 3, regardless of day of blastocyst development (day 5/6) or blastocyst grade. LBR varied significantly by day 3 embryo grade for both day 5 (48.0%, 51.5%, 46.6% and 32.7% for grades I, II, III and IV–V; <em>P</em> = 0.005) and day 6 (41.5%, 23.6%, 15.9% and 16.1% for grades I, II, III and IV–V; <em>P</em> = 0.001) blastocysts. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that non-good-quality embryos and lower morphological grade (IV–V) on day 3 were significantly and negatively correlated with LBR, while the number of blastomeres on day 3 was not an independent factor.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When selecting blastocysts of equal quality for SVBT cycles, those with higher day 3 morphological scores are preferred. Day 3 morphological evaluation is a valuable supplement to conventional selection methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive biomedicine online\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive biomedicine online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324005534\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324005534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题第 3 天胚胎形态能否作为单囊胚最佳选择的独立标准? 设计这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了 2019 年 10 月至 2022 年 7 月期间进行的 1517 例单玻璃化温育囊胚移植(SVBT)周期。研究评估了SVBT周期的活产率(LBR)和其他临床结果,同时考虑了第3天优质胚胎和非优质胚胎。评估了第 3 天形态特征(包括胚泡数量和胚胎等级)的相关性。结果在第 5 天(51.5% 对 42.9%;P = 0.013)和第 6 天(25.1% 对 17.6%;P = 0.018)囊胚中,来自优质第 3 天胚胎的囊胚的 LBR 明显高于来自非优质胚胎的囊胚。无论囊胚发育天数(第 5/6 天)或囊胚等级如何,第 3 天的 LBR 与囊胚数无明显差异。第 5 天(I、II、III 和 IV-V 级分别为 48.0%、51.5%、46.6% 和 32.7%;P = 0.005)和第 6 天(I、II、III 和 IV-V 级分别为 41.5%、23.6%、15.9% 和 16.1%;P = 0.001)囊胚的 LBR 随第 3 天胚胎等级的不同而有显著差异。多变量逻辑回归显示,非优质胚胎和第 3 天形态学等级较低(IV-V 级)与 LBR 呈显著负相关,而第 3 天的囊胚数量并非独立因素。第 3 天形态学评价是对传统选择方法的重要补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing single blastocyst selection: the role of day 3 embryo morphology in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles

Research question

Can day 3 embryo morphology serve as an independent criterion for optimal single blastocyst selection?

Design

This retrospective, single-centre cohort study included 1517 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) cycles conducted between October 2019 and July 2022. The live birth rate (LBR) and other clinical outcomes of SVBT cycles were evaluated, considering both good-quality and non-good-quality day 3 embryos. The associations of day 3 morphological characteristics, encompassing number of blastomeres and embryo grade, were assessed. Multivariable analyses were undertaken using multiple models adjusted for day of blastocyst development and blastocyst grade.

Results

Blastocysts from good-quality day 3 embryos had significantly higher LBR compared with those from non-good-quality embryos for both day 5 (51.5% versus 42.9%; P = 0.013) and day 6 (25.1% versus 17.6%; P = 0.018) blastocysts. LBR did not differ significantly with number of blastomeres on day 3, regardless of day of blastocyst development (day 5/6) or blastocyst grade. LBR varied significantly by day 3 embryo grade for both day 5 (48.0%, 51.5%, 46.6% and 32.7% for grades I, II, III and IV–V; P = 0.005) and day 6 (41.5%, 23.6%, 15.9% and 16.1% for grades I, II, III and IV–V; P = 0.001) blastocysts. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that non-good-quality embryos and lower morphological grade (IV–V) on day 3 were significantly and negatively correlated with LBR, while the number of blastomeres on day 3 was not an independent factor.

Conclusions

When selecting blastocysts of equal quality for SVBT cycles, those with higher day 3 morphological scores are preferred. Day 3 morphological evaluation is a valuable supplement to conventional selection methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: part I. germinal vesicle model validation. Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: Part II - verification of blastocyst development from mature oocytes. Inside Front Cover - Affiliations and First page of TOC Front Matter - Continued TOC Outside Back Cover - Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1