使用北欧口腔测试筛查唇腭裂患者的口腔功能障碍。

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.05.002
Neda Eslami, Erfan Bardideh, Pourya Tatari, Lohrasb Dehghani
{"title":"使用北欧口腔测试筛查唇腭裂患者的口腔功能障碍。","authors":"Neda Eslami, Erfan Bardideh, Pourya Tatari, Lohrasb Dehghani","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S) protocol serves as a widely recognized tool for assessing orofacial dysfunction comprehensively. This study aimed to compare orofacial dysfunction between unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate patients using the NOT-S.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study enrolled 104 patients, comprising 72 with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and 32 with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) referred to the cleft lip and palate clinic of Mashhad Dental School. Orofacial dysfunction was assessed using the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S), which includes a structured interview and clinical examinations encompassing 6 domains each. Statistical analysis utilized Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact, and Chi-square tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in structured interview (P = 0.45), clinical examination (P = 0.45), or total NOT-S score (P = 0.11) between the two types of cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on NOT-S assessment, patients with unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate exhibited comparable orofacial dysfunctions. In the structured interview, the most prevalent issues were identified in the domain of chewing and swallowing for both cleft types. In clinical examination, unilateral cleft lip and palate patients commonly experienced facial problems at rest, while bilateral cleft lip and palate patients frequently encountered challenges with speaking. However, these differences were not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orofacial dysfunction in cleft lip and palate patients using the nordic orofacial test-screening.\",\"authors\":\"Neda Eslami, Erfan Bardideh, Pourya Tatari, Lohrasb Dehghani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S) protocol serves as a widely recognized tool for assessing orofacial dysfunction comprehensively. This study aimed to compare orofacial dysfunction between unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate patients using the NOT-S.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study enrolled 104 patients, comprising 72 with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and 32 with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) referred to the cleft lip and palate clinic of Mashhad Dental School. Orofacial dysfunction was assessed using the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S), which includes a structured interview and clinical examinations encompassing 6 domains each. Statistical analysis utilized Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact, and Chi-square tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in structured interview (P = 0.45), clinical examination (P = 0.45), or total NOT-S score (P = 0.11) between the two types of cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on NOT-S assessment, patients with unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate exhibited comparable orofacial dysfunctions. In the structured interview, the most prevalent issues were identified in the domain of chewing and swallowing for both cleft types. In clinical examination, unilateral cleft lip and palate patients commonly experienced facial problems at rest, while bilateral cleft lip and palate patients frequently encountered challenges with speaking. However, these differences were not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.05.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.05.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介北欧口面部测试筛查(NOT-S)方案是公认的全面评估口面部功能障碍的工具。本研究旨在使用 NOT-S 对单侧(UCLP)和双侧(BCLP)唇腭裂患者的口面部功能障碍进行比较:这项描述性横断面研究共招募了 104 名患者,其中包括 72 名单侧唇腭裂患者(UCLP)和 32 名双侧唇腭裂患者(BCLP),他们都是转诊到马什哈德牙科学校唇腭裂诊所的。口面部功能障碍采用北欧口面部测试筛查(NOT-S)进行评估,包括结构化访谈和临床检查,每项检查涵盖 6 个领域。统计分析采用曼-惠特尼检验、费雪精确检验和卡方检验,显著性以 P < 0.05 为限:结果:两类唇腭裂患者在结构化访谈(P = 0.45)、临床检查(P = 0.45)或 NOT-S 总分(P = 0.11)方面均无明显差异:结论:根据 NOT-S 评估,单侧(UCLP)和双侧(BCLP)唇腭裂患者的口面部功能障碍具有可比性。在结构化访谈中,两种唇腭裂患者最普遍的问题都出现在咀嚼和吞咽方面。在临床检查中,单侧唇腭裂患者通常在休息时出现面部问题,而双侧唇腭裂患者则经常在说话时遇到困难。然而,这些差异在统计学上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Orofacial dysfunction in cleft lip and palate patients using the nordic orofacial test-screening.

Introduction: The Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S) protocol serves as a widely recognized tool for assessing orofacial dysfunction comprehensively. This study aimed to compare orofacial dysfunction between unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate patients using the NOT-S.

Materials and methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study enrolled 104 patients, comprising 72 with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and 32 with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) referred to the cleft lip and palate clinic of Mashhad Dental School. Orofacial dysfunction was assessed using the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S), which includes a structured interview and clinical examinations encompassing 6 domains each. Statistical analysis utilized Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact, and Chi-square tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: No significant differences were found in structured interview (P = 0.45), clinical examination (P = 0.45), or total NOT-S score (P = 0.11) between the two types of cleft lip and palate.

Conclusion: Based on NOT-S assessment, patients with unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate exhibited comparable orofacial dysfunctions. In the structured interview, the most prevalent issues were identified in the domain of chewing and swallowing for both cleft types. In clinical examination, unilateral cleft lip and palate patients commonly experienced facial problems at rest, while bilateral cleft lip and palate patients frequently encountered challenges with speaking. However, these differences were not statistically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
CDSNet: An automated method for assessing growth stages from various anatomical regions in lateral cephalograms based on deep learning. Microplastics and orthodontic aligners: The concerns arising from the modernization of practice through polymers and plastics. Assessment of coated orthodontic miniscrews with chlorhexidine hexametaphosphate antimicrobial nanoparticles: A randomized clinical trial. Protraction of a mandibular second molar into the adjacent atrophic first-molar extraction site with ridge-split technique through clear aligners: A case report. Automated dentition segmentation: 3D UNet-based approach with MIScnn framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1