关于社会项目的积极和消极协同作用:在参与式价值评估中处理相关性

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1177/23998083241264321
Francisco J Bahamonde-Birke, Niek Mouter
{"title":"关于社会项目的积极和消极协同作用:在参与式价值评估中处理相关性","authors":"Francisco J Bahamonde-Birke, Niek Mouter","doi":"10.1177/23998083241264321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory value evaluation (PVE) is a novel method aiming at the evaluation of projects from a societal perspective. It aims at establishing which investment projects or investment portfolios (with a portfolio containing multiple investment projects) are likely to be favored by the population, given a limited budget. The approach emulates the decision-making problem faced by policy-makers. The ultimate end of PVE is to evaluate and establish how individuals value attributes of public projects in order to construct social trade-offs between different attributes and investments projects. However, it is important to consider that when investment portfolios consist of more than one investment project, significant synergies (positive and negative) may exist among the projects. This paper proposes a new evaluation framework that allows addressing synergies among projects in the context of PVE, while also offering a highly flexible structure. The approach is tested making use of one synthetic and two real datasets. Results show that neglecting synergies among the utilities of the projects included in the chosen portfolio majorly reduces the model fit and biases the estimators.","PeriodicalId":11863,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"About positive and negative synergies of social projects: Treating correlation in participatory value evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Francisco J Bahamonde-Birke, Niek Mouter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23998083241264321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Participatory value evaluation (PVE) is a novel method aiming at the evaluation of projects from a societal perspective. It aims at establishing which investment projects or investment portfolios (with a portfolio containing multiple investment projects) are likely to be favored by the population, given a limited budget. The approach emulates the decision-making problem faced by policy-makers. The ultimate end of PVE is to evaluate and establish how individuals value attributes of public projects in order to construct social trade-offs between different attributes and investments projects. However, it is important to consider that when investment portfolios consist of more than one investment project, significant synergies (positive and negative) may exist among the projects. This paper proposes a new evaluation framework that allows addressing synergies among projects in the context of PVE, while also offering a highly flexible structure. The approach is tested making use of one synthetic and two real datasets. Results show that neglecting synergies among the utilities of the projects included in the chosen portfolio majorly reduces the model fit and biases the estimators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241264321\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241264321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

参与式价值评估(PVE)是一种新方法,旨在从社会角度对项目进行评估。其目的是在预算有限的情况下,确定哪些投资项目或投资组合(一个投资组合包含多个投资项目)可能受到民众的青睐。这种方法模拟了决策者面临的决策问题。PVE 的最终目的是评估和确定个人如何评价公共项目的属性,以便在不同属性和投资项目之间构建社会权衡。然而,重要的是要考虑到,当投资组合由一个以上的投资项目组成时,项目之间可能存在显著的协同效应(正效应和负效应)。本文提出了一个新的评估框架,可以在 PVE 的背景下处理项目间的协同作用,同时还提供了一个高度灵活的结构。本文利用一个合成数据集和两个真实数据集对该方法进行了测试。结果表明,忽略所选投资组合中包含的项目效用之间的协同作用会大大降低模型的拟合度,并使估计值出现偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
About positive and negative synergies of social projects: Treating correlation in participatory value evaluation
Participatory value evaluation (PVE) is a novel method aiming at the evaluation of projects from a societal perspective. It aims at establishing which investment projects or investment portfolios (with a portfolio containing multiple investment projects) are likely to be favored by the population, given a limited budget. The approach emulates the decision-making problem faced by policy-makers. The ultimate end of PVE is to evaluate and establish how individuals value attributes of public projects in order to construct social trade-offs between different attributes and investments projects. However, it is important to consider that when investment portfolios consist of more than one investment project, significant synergies (positive and negative) may exist among the projects. This paper proposes a new evaluation framework that allows addressing synergies among projects in the context of PVE, while also offering a highly flexible structure. The approach is tested making use of one synthetic and two real datasets. Results show that neglecting synergies among the utilities of the projects included in the chosen portfolio majorly reduces the model fit and biases the estimators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Investigating urban morphological drivers of household water use in developing economies: A structural equation model approach Towards a more realistic estimation of urban land take by combining cadastral parcels and building footprints A sidewalk-level urban heat risk assessment framework using pedestrian mobility and urban microclimate modeling Mapping sense of place as a measurable urban identity: Using street view images and machine learning to identify building façade materials Visualizing the global deployment of Filipina workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1