Kathryn Conrad、Cóilín Parsons 和 Julie McCormick Weng 编著的《科学、技术和爱尔兰现代主义》(评论)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Technology and Culture Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1353/tech.2024.a933132
Hamid Farahmandian
{"title":"Kathryn Conrad、Cóilín Parsons 和 Julie McCormick Weng 编著的《科学、技术和爱尔兰现代主义》(评论)","authors":"Hamid Farahmandian","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em> ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Hamid Farahmandian (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em><br/> Edited by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2019. Pp. xxii + 406. <p>The common misunderstanding regarding the depth of interest that Irish writers had in science and technology has arisen due to the dominant influence of certain iconic figures, such as W. B. Yeats. Yeats’s powerful and evocative imagery depicting scenes of the “sally gardens” and old Irish heroes has overshadowed the broader and more nuanced engagement of Irish writers with scientific and technological themes during the Literary and Cultural Revivals. The focus on traditional and cultural elements in works like Yeats’s has led to an underestimation of the multifaceted exploration of science and technology within the broader landscape of Irish modernist literature. In <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em>, editors Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng challenge this commonly held belief by exploring the relationship between Irish modernism and emerging sciences and technologies in the early twentieth century.</p> <p>The first part of the book explores how Irish Revivalists like J. M. Synge, Seumas O’Sullivan, and Emily Lawless aimed to reconcile religious and scientific experiences, suggesting reenchantment through scientific observation. It also discusses John Eglinton’s role in advocating for cosmopolitanism and modernity during the Irish Literary Revival. Transitioning to the 1916 Easter Rising, this part examines the impact of everyday life, cinema, and media technologies, emphasizing tableau vivant, montage, and film in shaping contemporary representations.</p> <p>The second part examines Tom Greer’s technological concepts, like mechanical wings and print media, and their influence on James Joyce, with a particular focus on the protagonist of <em>Ulysses</em>, Stephen Dedalus, emphasizing their shared concern for the effects of scientific discourse on human interaction. It then shifts to Yeats, exploring his avant-garde use of theater technology, particularly scenography, as a deliberate break from conventional realism and English cultural materialism. A chapter on Elizabeth Bowen concludes this part by challenging the tech-tradition dichotomy, portraying gadget interactions and entrepreneurial pursuits in the travel industry as integral to her characters’ morality.</p> <p>Part 3 investigates the impact of gramophones and radio on Lennox Robinson’s play <em>Portrait</em> (1925), serving as a metaphor for postindependence Ireland’s psychological strain. This part shifts to Joyce, exploring his adaptation to the evolving media landscape through gramophone recordings and the challenges faced during radio’s transitional period. It ends with Denis Johnston’s engagement with radio and its unique dramas, highlighting technological challenges and collaborative dynamics in broadcasting. <strong>[End Page 1050]</strong></p> <p>The fourth part examines the intersection of medicine and literature in Joyce’s <em>Ulysses</em>, focusing on the significance of the heart as an organ, Yeats’s problematic fascination with eugenics, proposing limits on education for specific individuals and expressing worries about a decline in those he deemed superior in Irish society, and Samuel Beckett’s paradoxical stance on biology, particularly his minimal engagement with Darwinian evolution, reflecting a distinct existential inquiry beyond traditional scientific discourse.</p> <p>Part 5 explores Yeats’s and Beckett’s incorporation of new physics. Yeats combined science and the occult for ghostly themes, while Beckett explored light and time using minimalistic stage elements. The chapter then delves into the broader influence of relativity and quantum physics, disrupting traditional scientific certainties and introducing uncertainty. A look at John Banville’s science tetralogy further extends this dialogue, reshaping narrative structures and the literature-science-time relationship in Irish modernism within the evolving scientific landscape.</p> <p>One of the book’s most significant contributions is its challenge to the prevalent stereotype that Irish modernism was inherently anti-scientific and Luddite in its orientation. It highlights the intellectual richness of Irish modernist thought, portraying science and technology not as adversaries but as integral components of the creative landscape. Encouraging readers to embrace interdisciplinary modernist studies, the book reevaluates Irish modernism, shedding light on previously underexplored facets and offering a nuanced understanding of the relationship between tradition and innovation, the local and the global, and the poetic and the scientific. This addition to Irish modernism expands horizons, inviting readers to...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng (review)\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Farahmandian\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a933132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em> ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Hamid Farahmandian (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em><br/> Edited by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2019. Pp. xxii + 406. <p>The common misunderstanding regarding the depth of interest that Irish writers had in science and technology has arisen due to the dominant influence of certain iconic figures, such as W. B. Yeats. Yeats’s powerful and evocative imagery depicting scenes of the “sally gardens” and old Irish heroes has overshadowed the broader and more nuanced engagement of Irish writers with scientific and technological themes during the Literary and Cultural Revivals. The focus on traditional and cultural elements in works like Yeats’s has led to an underestimation of the multifaceted exploration of science and technology within the broader landscape of Irish modernist literature. In <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em>, editors Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng challenge this commonly held belief by exploring the relationship between Irish modernism and emerging sciences and technologies in the early twentieth century.</p> <p>The first part of the book explores how Irish Revivalists like J. M. Synge, Seumas O’Sullivan, and Emily Lawless aimed to reconcile religious and scientific experiences, suggesting reenchantment through scientific observation. It also discusses John Eglinton’s role in advocating for cosmopolitanism and modernity during the Irish Literary Revival. Transitioning to the 1916 Easter Rising, this part examines the impact of everyday life, cinema, and media technologies, emphasizing tableau vivant, montage, and film in shaping contemporary representations.</p> <p>The second part examines Tom Greer’s technological concepts, like mechanical wings and print media, and their influence on James Joyce, with a particular focus on the protagonist of <em>Ulysses</em>, Stephen Dedalus, emphasizing their shared concern for the effects of scientific discourse on human interaction. It then shifts to Yeats, exploring his avant-garde use of theater technology, particularly scenography, as a deliberate break from conventional realism and English cultural materialism. A chapter on Elizabeth Bowen concludes this part by challenging the tech-tradition dichotomy, portraying gadget interactions and entrepreneurial pursuits in the travel industry as integral to her characters’ morality.</p> <p>Part 3 investigates the impact of gramophones and radio on Lennox Robinson’s play <em>Portrait</em> (1925), serving as a metaphor for postindependence Ireland’s psychological strain. This part shifts to Joyce, exploring his adaptation to the evolving media landscape through gramophone recordings and the challenges faced during radio’s transitional period. It ends with Denis Johnston’s engagement with radio and its unique dramas, highlighting technological challenges and collaborative dynamics in broadcasting. <strong>[End Page 1050]</strong></p> <p>The fourth part examines the intersection of medicine and literature in Joyce’s <em>Ulysses</em>, focusing on the significance of the heart as an organ, Yeats’s problematic fascination with eugenics, proposing limits on education for specific individuals and expressing worries about a decline in those he deemed superior in Irish society, and Samuel Beckett’s paradoxical stance on biology, particularly his minimal engagement with Darwinian evolution, reflecting a distinct existential inquiry beyond traditional scientific discourse.</p> <p>Part 5 explores Yeats’s and Beckett’s incorporation of new physics. Yeats combined science and the occult for ghostly themes, while Beckett explored light and time using minimalistic stage elements. The chapter then delves into the broader influence of relativity and quantum physics, disrupting traditional scientific certainties and introducing uncertainty. A look at John Banville’s science tetralogy further extends this dialogue, reshaping narrative structures and the literature-science-time relationship in Irish modernism within the evolving scientific landscape.</p> <p>One of the book’s most significant contributions is its challenge to the prevalent stereotype that Irish modernism was inherently anti-scientific and Luddite in its orientation. It highlights the intellectual richness of Irish modernist thought, portraying science and technology not as adversaries but as integral components of the creative landscape. Encouraging readers to embrace interdisciplinary modernist studies, the book reevaluates Irish modernism, shedding light on previously underexplored facets and offering a nuanced understanding of the relationship between tradition and innovation, the local and the global, and the poetic and the scientific. This addition to Irish modernism expands horizons, inviting readers to...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评论者:Kathryn Conrad、Cóilín Parsons 和 Julie McCormick 科学、技术和爱尔兰现代主义》,凯瑟琳-康拉德、科林-帕森斯和朱莉-麦考密克-翁编著,哈米德-法拉曼迪安(简历),《科学、技术和爱尔兰现代主义》,凯瑟琳-康拉德、科林-帕森斯和朱莉-麦考密克-翁编著。锡拉丘兹:锡拉丘兹大学出版社,2019 年。第 xxii + 406 页。爱尔兰作家对科学和技术的兴趣之深,普遍存在误解,这是因为某些标志性人物(如 W. B. 叶芝)的主导影响。叶芝描绘的 "莎莉花园 "和爱尔兰老英雄的场景极具震撼力,令人回味无穷,这掩盖了爱尔兰作家在文学和文化复兴时期对科技主题更广泛、更细致入微的参与。对叶芝等作品中传统和文化元素的关注,导致人们低估了爱尔兰现代主义文学在更广阔的视野中对科学和技术的多方面探索。在《科学、技术与爱尔兰现代主义》一书中,编者凯瑟琳-康拉德(Kathryn Conrad)、科林-帕森斯(Cóilín Parsons)和朱莉-麦考密克-翁(Julie McCormick Weng)通过探讨爱尔兰现代主义与 20 世纪早期新兴科学和技术之间的关系,对这一普遍看法提出了挑战。本书的第一部分探讨了爱尔兰复兴主义者,如 J. M. Synge、Seumas O'Sullivan 和 Emily Lawless 是如何调和宗教与科学经验的,并建议通过科学观察来重新陶冶情操。报告还讨论了约翰-埃格林顿在爱尔兰文学复兴时期倡导世界主义和现代性的作用。这一部分过渡到 1916 年复活节起义,探讨了日常生活、电影和媒体技术的影响,强调了生动画面、蒙太奇和电影在塑造当代表象方面的作用。第二部分探讨了汤姆-格里尔的技术概念,如机械翅膀和印刷媒体,以及它们对詹姆斯-乔伊斯的影响,尤其关注《尤利西斯》的主人公斯蒂芬-德达鲁斯,强调他们共同关注科学话语对人类互动的影响。随后,本章转向叶芝,探讨了他对戏剧技术,尤其是场景设计的前卫运用,这是对传统现实主义和英国文化唯物主义的有意突破。伊丽莎白-鲍温(Elizabeth Bowen)一章对技术与传统的二分法提出了挑战,将旅游行业中的小工具互动和创业追求描绘成她笔下人物道德不可或缺的一部分,从而结束了这一部分。第 3 部分探讨了留声机和收音机对伦诺克斯-罗宾逊(Lennox Robinson)的戏剧《肖像》(1925 年)的影响,隐喻了独立后爱尔兰的心理压力。这一部分转向乔伊斯,探讨他通过留声机录音适应不断变化的媒体环境,以及在广播转型期所面临的挑战。本部分以丹尼斯-约翰斯顿(Denis Johnston)与广播及其独特戏剧的接触为结尾,强调了广播中的技术挑战和合作动力。[第四部分探讨了乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》中医学与文学的交集,重点关注心脏作为器官的意义;叶芝对优生学的迷恋存在问题,他提出对特定个人的教育进行限制,并对他认为爱尔兰社会中优等人的减少表示担忧;塞缪尔-贝克特对生物学的立场自相矛盾,特别是他对达尔文进化论的极少参与,反映了他超越传统科学话语的独特的存在主义探究。第五部分探讨了叶芝和贝克特对新物理学的吸收。叶芝将科学与神秘学相结合,以鬼魂为主题,而贝克特则利用极简的舞台元素探索光与时间。本章随后深入探讨了相对论和量子物理学的广泛影响,它们打破了传统科学的确定性,引入了不确定性。约翰-班维尔(John Banville)的科学四部曲进一步扩展了这一对话,在不断演变的科学景观中重塑了爱尔兰现代主义的叙事结构和文学-科学-时间关系。本书最重要的贡献之一是对爱尔兰现代主义本质上是反科学和卢德主义者这一普遍的刻板印象提出了挑战。该书强调了爱尔兰现代主义思想的丰富内涵,没有将科学技术视为对手,而是将其视为创造性景观中不可或缺的组成部分。该书鼓励读者接受跨学科的现代主义研究,重新评价了爱尔兰现代主义,揭示了以前未被充分探索的方面,并对传统与创新、本地与全球、诗意与科学之间的关系提供了细致入微的理解。这本爱尔兰现代主义的新书拓展了视野,邀请读者去了解爱尔兰的现代主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng (review)

Reviewed by:

  • Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng
  • Hamid Farahmandian (bio)
Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism
Edited by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2019. Pp. xxii + 406.

The common misunderstanding regarding the depth of interest that Irish writers had in science and technology has arisen due to the dominant influence of certain iconic figures, such as W. B. Yeats. Yeats’s powerful and evocative imagery depicting scenes of the “sally gardens” and old Irish heroes has overshadowed the broader and more nuanced engagement of Irish writers with scientific and technological themes during the Literary and Cultural Revivals. The focus on traditional and cultural elements in works like Yeats’s has led to an underestimation of the multifaceted exploration of science and technology within the broader landscape of Irish modernist literature. In Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism, editors Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng challenge this commonly held belief by exploring the relationship between Irish modernism and emerging sciences and technologies in the early twentieth century.

The first part of the book explores how Irish Revivalists like J. M. Synge, Seumas O’Sullivan, and Emily Lawless aimed to reconcile religious and scientific experiences, suggesting reenchantment through scientific observation. It also discusses John Eglinton’s role in advocating for cosmopolitanism and modernity during the Irish Literary Revival. Transitioning to the 1916 Easter Rising, this part examines the impact of everyday life, cinema, and media technologies, emphasizing tableau vivant, montage, and film in shaping contemporary representations.

The second part examines Tom Greer’s technological concepts, like mechanical wings and print media, and their influence on James Joyce, with a particular focus on the protagonist of Ulysses, Stephen Dedalus, emphasizing their shared concern for the effects of scientific discourse on human interaction. It then shifts to Yeats, exploring his avant-garde use of theater technology, particularly scenography, as a deliberate break from conventional realism and English cultural materialism. A chapter on Elizabeth Bowen concludes this part by challenging the tech-tradition dichotomy, portraying gadget interactions and entrepreneurial pursuits in the travel industry as integral to her characters’ morality.

Part 3 investigates the impact of gramophones and radio on Lennox Robinson’s play Portrait (1925), serving as a metaphor for postindependence Ireland’s psychological strain. This part shifts to Joyce, exploring his adaptation to the evolving media landscape through gramophone recordings and the challenges faced during radio’s transitional period. It ends with Denis Johnston’s engagement with radio and its unique dramas, highlighting technological challenges and collaborative dynamics in broadcasting. [End Page 1050]

The fourth part examines the intersection of medicine and literature in Joyce’s Ulysses, focusing on the significance of the heart as an organ, Yeats’s problematic fascination with eugenics, proposing limits on education for specific individuals and expressing worries about a decline in those he deemed superior in Irish society, and Samuel Beckett’s paradoxical stance on biology, particularly his minimal engagement with Darwinian evolution, reflecting a distinct existential inquiry beyond traditional scientific discourse.

Part 5 explores Yeats’s and Beckett’s incorporation of new physics. Yeats combined science and the occult for ghostly themes, while Beckett explored light and time using minimalistic stage elements. The chapter then delves into the broader influence of relativity and quantum physics, disrupting traditional scientific certainties and introducing uncertainty. A look at John Banville’s science tetralogy further extends this dialogue, reshaping narrative structures and the literature-science-time relationship in Irish modernism within the evolving scientific landscape.

One of the book’s most significant contributions is its challenge to the prevalent stereotype that Irish modernism was inherently anti-scientific and Luddite in its orientation. It highlights the intellectual richness of Irish modernist thought, portraying science and technology not as adversaries but as integral components of the creative landscape. Encouraging readers to embrace interdisciplinary modernist studies, the book reevaluates Irish modernism, shedding light on previously underexplored facets and offering a nuanced understanding of the relationship between tradition and innovation, the local and the global, and the poetic and the scientific. This addition to Irish modernism expands horizons, inviting readers to...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
期刊最新文献
Hollywood's Embassies: How Movie Theaters Projected American Power Around the Globe by Ross Melnick (review) Communications in Turkey and the Ottoman Empire: A Critical History by Burçe Çelik (review) Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology by Margaret Jack (review) Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy ed. by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller (review) Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State by Roland Jackson (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1