评估胆总管造口术后继发性肝结石的疗效和并发症:日本全国调查。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1002/jhbp.12061
Yutaka Suzuki, Masao Yoshida, Toshio Fujisawa, Masaaki Shimatani, Toshio Tsuyuguchi, Toshiyuki Mori, Susumu Tazuma, Hiroyuki Isayama, Atsushi Tanaka
{"title":"评估胆总管造口术后继发性肝结石的疗效和并发症:日本全国调查。","authors":"Yutaka Suzuki,&nbsp;Masao Yoshida,&nbsp;Toshio Fujisawa,&nbsp;Masaaki Shimatani,&nbsp;Toshio Tsuyuguchi,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Mori,&nbsp;Susumu Tazuma,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Isayama,&nbsp;Atsushi Tanaka","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of secondary hepatolithiasis following choledochoenterostomy to guide suitable management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study analyzed 127 patients from a 2017 national survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. The 2023 cohort study assessed residual stones, recurrences, cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma, and prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median follow-up duration was 48 months. Balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (BE-ERC) was the most common treatment, achieving complete stone clearance in 84.4% of patients. Anatomical hepatectomy was the most common surgery. Predictors of residual stones were stone number ≥10 (odds ratio [OR], 7.480; <i>p</i> = .028) and stone diameter ≥10 mm (OR, 5.280; <i>p</i> = .020). Predictors of stone recurrence during follow-up were biliary strictures (hazard ratio [HR], 3.580; <i>p</i> = .005) and cholangitis (HR, 2.700; <i>p</i> = .037). Predictors of cholangitis during follow-up were biliary stricture (HR, 5.016; <i>p</i> = .006) and dilatation (HR, 3.560; <i>p</i> = .029). Any treatment for hepatolithiasis reduced cholangitis occurrence (HR, 0.168; <i>p</i> = .042). Balloon dilation combined with stenting for ≥3 months improved biliary strictures in 57.1% of patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study recommends BE-ERC as the first-choice treatment for secondary hepatolithiasis. Stone removal and relief of biliary strictures and dilatation are crucial to prevent stone recurrence and cholangitis after treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing outcomes and complications of secondary hepatolithiasis after choledochoenterostomy: A nationwide survey in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Yutaka Suzuki,&nbsp;Masao Yoshida,&nbsp;Toshio Fujisawa,&nbsp;Masaaki Shimatani,&nbsp;Toshio Tsuyuguchi,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Mori,&nbsp;Susumu Tazuma,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Isayama,&nbsp;Atsushi Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of secondary hepatolithiasis following choledochoenterostomy to guide suitable management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study analyzed 127 patients from a 2017 national survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. The 2023 cohort study assessed residual stones, recurrences, cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma, and prognosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The median follow-up duration was 48 months. Balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (BE-ERC) was the most common treatment, achieving complete stone clearance in 84.4% of patients. Anatomical hepatectomy was the most common surgery. Predictors of residual stones were stone number ≥10 (odds ratio [OR], 7.480; <i>p</i> = .028) and stone diameter ≥10 mm (OR, 5.280; <i>p</i> = .020). Predictors of stone recurrence during follow-up were biliary strictures (hazard ratio [HR], 3.580; <i>p</i> = .005) and cholangitis (HR, 2.700; <i>p</i> = .037). Predictors of cholangitis during follow-up were biliary stricture (HR, 5.016; <i>p</i> = .006) and dilatation (HR, 3.560; <i>p</i> = .029). Any treatment for hepatolithiasis reduced cholangitis occurrence (HR, 0.168; <i>p</i> = .042). Balloon dilation combined with stenting for ≥3 months improved biliary strictures in 57.1% of patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study recommends BE-ERC as the first-choice treatment for secondary hepatolithiasis. Stone removal and relief of biliary strictures and dilatation are crucial to prevent stone recurrence and cholangitis after treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估胆总管造口术后继发性肝结石的治疗效果和并发症:本研究旨在评估胆总管造口术后继发性肝结石的治疗效果和并发症,以指导合适的治疗方法:该研究分析了卫生、劳动和福利部 2017 年开展的一项全国调查中的 127 名患者。2023年队列研究评估了残留结石、复发、胆管炎、胆管癌和预后:中位随访时间为 48 个月。球囊内镜辅助内镜逆行性胆管造影术(BE-ERC)是最常见的治疗方法,84.4%的患者可完全清除结石。解剖性肝切除术是最常见的手术。残余结石的预测因素是结石数量≥10(几率比[OR],7.480;P = .028)和结石直径≥10 mm(OR,5.280;P = .020)。随访期间结石复发的预测因素是胆道狭窄(危险比 [HR],3.580;p = .005)和胆管炎(HR,2.700;p = .037)。随访期间胆管炎的预测因素是胆道狭窄(HR,5.016;p = .006)和胆道扩张(HR,3.560;p = .029)。对肝结石的任何治疗都会减少胆管炎的发生(HR,0.168;p = .042)。球囊扩张联合支架植入术持续≥3个月可改善57.1%患者的胆道狭窄:本研究建议将 BE-ERC 作为继发性肝结石的首选治疗方法。结石清除、胆道狭窄缓解和扩张对预防结石复发和治疗后胆管炎至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing outcomes and complications of secondary hepatolithiasis after choledochoenterostomy: A nationwide survey in Japan

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of secondary hepatolithiasis following choledochoenterostomy to guide suitable management.

Methods

The study analyzed 127 patients from a 2017 national survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. The 2023 cohort study assessed residual stones, recurrences, cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma, and prognosis.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 48 months. Balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (BE-ERC) was the most common treatment, achieving complete stone clearance in 84.4% of patients. Anatomical hepatectomy was the most common surgery. Predictors of residual stones were stone number ≥10 (odds ratio [OR], 7.480; p = .028) and stone diameter ≥10 mm (OR, 5.280; p = .020). Predictors of stone recurrence during follow-up were biliary strictures (hazard ratio [HR], 3.580; p = .005) and cholangitis (HR, 2.700; p = .037). Predictors of cholangitis during follow-up were biliary stricture (HR, 5.016; p = .006) and dilatation (HR, 3.560; p = .029). Any treatment for hepatolithiasis reduced cholangitis occurrence (HR, 0.168; p = .042). Balloon dilation combined with stenting for ≥3 months improved biliary strictures in 57.1% of patients.

Conclusion

This study recommends BE-ERC as the first-choice treatment for secondary hepatolithiasis. Stone removal and relief of biliary strictures and dilatation are crucial to prevent stone recurrence and cholangitis after treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Minimally invasive approach of hepatectomy and thrombectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with right atrial tumor thrombus without sternotomy using percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Prognostic significance of creatine kinase in resected pancreatic cancer. Short- and long-term outcomes of liver resection with hepatic vein reconstruction for liver tumors: A nationwide multicenter survey. Issue Information Frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with hepatectomy - the importance of design studies to improve frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 128 868 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1