对讨论者关于 "NMA，第一个 20 年 "的评论的回应。

IF 5 2区生物学 Q1 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Research Synthesis Methods Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1745

A. E. Ades, Nicky J. Welton, Sofia Dias, Deborah M. Caldwell, David M. Phillippo

{"title":"对讨论者关于 \"NMA，第一个 20 年 \"的评论的回应。","authors":"A. E. Ades, Nicky J. Welton, Sofia Dias, Deborah M. Caldwell, David M. Phillippo","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We respond to discussant comments on our paper “Twenty years of network meta-analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments” (https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1700) and raise some additional points for consideration, including: the way in which methodological guidance is generated; integration of the estimand framework with evidence synthesis; and implications of the European Joint Clinical Assessment. We ask: what properties are required of population adjustment methods to enable transparent and consistent decision-making? We also ask why individual patient data is not routinely made available to re-imbursement authorities and clinical guideline developers.","PeriodicalId":226,"journal":{"name":"Research Synthesis Methods","volume":"15 5","pages":"751-757"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jrsm.1745","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to discussant comments on “NMA, the first 20 years”\",\"authors\":\"A. E. Ades, Nicky J. Welton, Sofia Dias, Deborah M. Caldwell, David M. Phillippo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jrsm.1745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We respond to discussant comments on our paper “Twenty years of network meta-analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments” (https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1700) and raise some additional points for consideration, including: the way in which methodological guidance is generated; integration of the estimand framework with evidence synthesis; and implications of the European Joint Clinical Assessment. We ask: what properties are required of population adjustment methods to enable transparent and consistent decision-making? We also ask why individual patient data is not routinely made available to re-imbursement authorities and clinical guideline developers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Synthesis Methods\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"751-757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jrsm.1745\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Synthesis Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.1745\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Synthesis Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.1745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们回应了讨论者对我们的论文 "网络荟萃分析二十年：持续争议与最新进展》(https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1700) 的讨论意见，并提出了一些补充要点供参考，包括：方法论指导的产生方式；估计值框架与证据综合的整合；以及欧洲联合临床评估的影响。我们要问：人群调整方法需要具备哪些特性才能做出透明、一致的决策？我们还问：为什么不向报销机构和临床指南制定者例行提供个体患者数据？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Response to discussant comments on “NMA, the first 20 years”

We respond to discussant comments on our paper “Twenty years of network meta-analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments” (https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1700) and raise some additional points for consideration, including: the way in which methodological guidance is generated; integration of the estimand framework with evidence synthesis; and implications of the European Joint Clinical Assessment. We ask: what properties are required of population adjustment methods to enable transparent and consistent decision-making? We also ask why individual patient data is not routinely made available to re-imbursement authorities and clinical guideline developers.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Research Synthesis Methods MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGYMULTID-MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

CiteScore

16.90

自引率

3.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Research Synthesis Methods is a reputable, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the development and dissemination of methods for conducting systematic research synthesis. Our aim is to advance the knowledge and application of research synthesis methods across various disciplines. Our journal provides a platform for the exchange of ideas and knowledge related to designing, conducting, analyzing, interpreting, reporting, and applying research synthesis. While research synthesis is commonly practiced in the health and social sciences, our journal also welcomes contributions from other fields to enrich the methodologies employed in research synthesis across scientific disciplines. By bridging different disciplines, we aim to foster collaboration and cross-fertilization of ideas, ultimately enhancing the quality and effectiveness of research synthesis methods. Whether you are a researcher, practitioner, or stakeholder involved in research synthesis, our journal strives to offer valuable insights and practical guidance for your work.