放射组学作为经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌预后预测的工具:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiologia Medica Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1007/s11547-024-01840-9
Kaige Deng, Tong Chen, Zijian Leng, Fan Yang, Tao Lu, Jingying Cao, Weixuan Pan, Yongchang Zheng
{"title":"放射组学作为经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌预后预测的工具:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kaige Deng, Tong Chen, Zijian Leng, Fan Yang, Tao Lu, Jingying Cao, Weixuan Pan, Yongchang Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01840-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the predominant locoregional therapeutic modalities for addressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, achieving precise prognostic predictions and effective patient selection remains a challenging pursuit. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of radiomics in forecasting the prognosis associated with TACE treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive exploration of pertinent original studies was undertaken, encompassing databases of PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The studies' quality was meticulously evaluated employing the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2), the radiomics quality score (RQS) and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Pooled statistics, along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), were computed for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Additionally, a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was generated. To discern potential sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review incorporated 29 studies, comprising a total of 5483 patients, with 14 studies involving 2691 patients qualifying for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The assessed studies exhibited commendable quality with regard to bias risk, with mean RQS of 12.90 ± 5.13 (35.82% ± 14.25%) and mean METRICS of 62.98% ± 14.58%. The pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92), PLR was 6.13 (95% CI: 3.79-9.90), and NLR was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.15-0.27). The area under the sROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93). Significant heterogeneity within all the included studies was observed, while meta-regression and subgroup analyses revealed homogeneous and promising findings in subgroups where principal methodological variables such as modeling algorithms, imaging modalities, and imaging phases were specified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics models have exhibited robust predictive capabilities concerning prognosis subsequent to TACE, thereby presenting promising prospects for clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":"1099-1117"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomics as a tool for prognostic prediction in transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kaige Deng, Tong Chen, Zijian Leng, Fan Yang, Tao Lu, Jingying Cao, Weixuan Pan, Yongchang Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-024-01840-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the predominant locoregional therapeutic modalities for addressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, achieving precise prognostic predictions and effective patient selection remains a challenging pursuit. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of radiomics in forecasting the prognosis associated with TACE treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive exploration of pertinent original studies was undertaken, encompassing databases of PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The studies' quality was meticulously evaluated employing the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2), the radiomics quality score (RQS) and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Pooled statistics, along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), were computed for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Additionally, a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was generated. To discern potential sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review incorporated 29 studies, comprising a total of 5483 patients, with 14 studies involving 2691 patients qualifying for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The assessed studies exhibited commendable quality with regard to bias risk, with mean RQS of 12.90 ± 5.13 (35.82% ± 14.25%) and mean METRICS of 62.98% ± 14.58%. The pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92), PLR was 6.13 (95% CI: 3.79-9.90), and NLR was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.15-0.27). The area under the sROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93). Significant heterogeneity within all the included studies was observed, while meta-regression and subgroup analyses revealed homogeneous and promising findings in subgroups where principal methodological variables such as modeling algorithms, imaging modalities, and imaging phases were specified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics models have exhibited robust predictive capabilities concerning prognosis subsequent to TACE, thereby presenting promising prospects for clinical translation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1099-1117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01840-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01840-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)是治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的主要局部治疗方法之一。然而,实现精确的预后预测和有效的患者选择仍然是一项具有挑战性的工作。本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是评估放射组学在预测与TACE治疗相关的预后方面的功效:对相关的原始研究进行了全面的探索,包括PubMed、Web of Science和Embase数据库。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估2(QUADAS-2)、放射组学质量评分(RQS)和METhodological RadiomICs评分(METRICS)对研究质量进行了细致评估。计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)和阴性似然比(NLR)的汇总统计数据和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)。此外,还生成了接收者操作特征曲线汇总表(sROC)。为找出潜在的异质性来源,进行了元回归和亚组分析:系统综述纳入了 29 项研究,共涉及 5483 名患者,其中 14 项研究涉及 2691 名患者,符合纳入荟萃分析的条件。所评估的研究在偏倚风险方面表现出值得称道的质量,平均 RQS 为 12.90 ± 5.13(35.82% ± 14.25%),平均 METRICS 为 62.98% ± 14.58%。汇总灵敏度为 0.83(95% CI:0.78-0.87),特异性为 0.86(95% CI:0.79-0.92),PLR 为 6.13(95% CI:3.79-9.90),NLR 为 0.20(95% CI:0.15-0.27)。sROC下面积为0.90(95% CI:0.87-0.93)。在所有纳入的研究中都观察到了显著的异质性,而元回归和亚组分析显示,在指定了主要方法学变量(如建模算法、成像模式和成像阶段)的亚组中,研究结果具有同质性且前景良好:结论:放射组学模型对 TACE 后的预后具有很强的预测能力,因此具有很好的临床转化前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiomics as a tool for prognostic prediction in transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the predominant locoregional therapeutic modalities for addressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, achieving precise prognostic predictions and effective patient selection remains a challenging pursuit. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of radiomics in forecasting the prognosis associated with TACE treatment.

Methods: A comprehensive exploration of pertinent original studies was undertaken, encompassing databases of PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The studies' quality was meticulously evaluated employing the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2), the radiomics quality score (RQS) and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Pooled statistics, along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), were computed for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Additionally, a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was generated. To discern potential sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results: The systematic review incorporated 29 studies, comprising a total of 5483 patients, with 14 studies involving 2691 patients qualifying for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The assessed studies exhibited commendable quality with regard to bias risk, with mean RQS of 12.90 ± 5.13 (35.82% ± 14.25%) and mean METRICS of 62.98% ± 14.58%. The pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92), PLR was 6.13 (95% CI: 3.79-9.90), and NLR was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.15-0.27). The area under the sROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93). Significant heterogeneity within all the included studies was observed, while meta-regression and subgroup analyses revealed homogeneous and promising findings in subgroups where principal methodological variables such as modeling algorithms, imaging modalities, and imaging phases were specified.

Conclusion: Radiomics models have exhibited robust predictive capabilities concerning prognosis subsequent to TACE, thereby presenting promising prospects for clinical translation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
期刊最新文献
A CT-based deep learning for segmenting tumors and predicting microsatellite instability in patients with colorectal cancers: a multicenter cohort study. Nodal assessment and extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell cancer: insights from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Radiomics based on brain-to-tumor interface enables prediction of metastatic tumor type of brain metastasis: a proof-of-concept study. Impact of body fat composition on liver iron overload severity in hemochromatosis: a retrospective MRI analysis. A multi-center, multi-organ, multi-omic prediction model for treatment-induced severe oral mucositis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1