监管是为了排斥还是为了扶持?墨西哥食品安全的机构建设与跨国标准采用

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Studies in Comparative International Development Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1007/s12116-024-09438-y
Gerald A. McDermott, Belem Avendaño Ruiz
{"title":"监管是为了排斥还是为了扶持?墨西哥食品安全的机构建设与跨国标准采用","authors":"Gerald A. McDermott, Belem Avendaño Ruiz","doi":"10.1007/s12116-024-09438-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A key challenge for integrating new transnational regulations into a semi-periphery country is creating institutional capacities for effective dissemination and monitoring of the standards and for upgrading a broad base of firms to implement and benefit from them. Instilled by NAFTA, Mexico embraced transnational food value chains, yet the results were rather mixed, as the vast majority of producers cannot implement new standards and participate. New rules and practices are not adopted on a tabula rasa but layered on prior socio-political institutions that are raw materials for new collaboration and blockage. We argue that improvements in both regulatory institutions and firm capabilities are driven by the creation of public–private learning communities, which in turn are shaped by prior institutional legacies at the public–private divide. The ability of producers to undertake organizational experiments with one another and key public actors is greatly constrained by the legacies of corporatism. Refashioned producer associations could initiate with certain local public institutions regulatory and technological upgrading for a limited number of firms, which became gatekeepers for certification.</p>","PeriodicalId":47488,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Comparative International Development","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating to Exclude or to Enable: Institution Building and Transnational Standard Adoption in Mexican Food Safety\",\"authors\":\"Gerald A. McDermott, Belem Avendaño Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12116-024-09438-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A key challenge for integrating new transnational regulations into a semi-periphery country is creating institutional capacities for effective dissemination and monitoring of the standards and for upgrading a broad base of firms to implement and benefit from them. Instilled by NAFTA, Mexico embraced transnational food value chains, yet the results were rather mixed, as the vast majority of producers cannot implement new standards and participate. New rules and practices are not adopted on a tabula rasa but layered on prior socio-political institutions that are raw materials for new collaboration and blockage. We argue that improvements in both regulatory institutions and firm capabilities are driven by the creation of public–private learning communities, which in turn are shaped by prior institutional legacies at the public–private divide. The ability of producers to undertake organizational experiments with one another and key public actors is greatly constrained by the legacies of corporatism. Refashioned producer associations could initiate with certain local public institutions regulatory and technological upgrading for a limited number of firms, which became gatekeepers for certification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Comparative International Development\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Comparative International Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-024-09438-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Comparative International Development","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-024-09438-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将新的跨国法规纳入一个半边缘国家所面临的主要挑战是建立机构能力,以有效地传播和监测标准,并提升广大企业的能力,使其能够执行这些标准并从中受益。在《北美自由贸易协定》的推动下,墨西哥接受了跨国食品价值链,但结果却好坏参半,因为绝大多数生产商无法执行新标准并参与其中。新的规则和做法并非照搬照抄,而是在原有的社会政治体制基础上层层叠加,这些体制是新的合作和阻挠的原材料。我们认为,监管机构和企业能力的提高是由公私学习社区的建立推动的,而公私学习社区的建立又是由公私分界线上先前的制度遗产形成的。生产者相互之间以及与主要公共参与者进行组织实验的能力,在很大程度上受到公司制遗留问题的制约。改组后的生产者协会可以与某些地方公共机构合作,对少数企业进行监管和技术升级,这些企业成为认证的守门人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulating to Exclude or to Enable: Institution Building and Transnational Standard Adoption in Mexican Food Safety

A key challenge for integrating new transnational regulations into a semi-periphery country is creating institutional capacities for effective dissemination and monitoring of the standards and for upgrading a broad base of firms to implement and benefit from them. Instilled by NAFTA, Mexico embraced transnational food value chains, yet the results were rather mixed, as the vast majority of producers cannot implement new standards and participate. New rules and practices are not adopted on a tabula rasa but layered on prior socio-political institutions that are raw materials for new collaboration and blockage. We argue that improvements in both regulatory institutions and firm capabilities are driven by the creation of public–private learning communities, which in turn are shaped by prior institutional legacies at the public–private divide. The ability of producers to undertake organizational experiments with one another and key public actors is greatly constrained by the legacies of corporatism. Refashioned producer associations could initiate with certain local public institutions regulatory and technological upgrading for a limited number of firms, which became gatekeepers for certification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) is an interdisciplinary journal that addresses issues concerning political, social, economic, and environmental change in local, national, and international contexts. Among its major emphasis are political and state institutions; the effects of a changing international economy; political-economic models of growth and distribution; and the transformation of social structure and culture.The journal has a tradition of presenting critical and innovative analytical perspectives that challenge prevailing orthodoxies. It publishes original research articles on the developing world and is open to all theoretical and methodical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Development NGOs, Domestic Politics, and Foreign Aid Allocations Regulating to Exclude or to Enable: Institution Building and Transnational Standard Adoption in Mexican Food Safety From Rust to High-Tech Hubs: FDI-Led Upgrading of Urban Economies in East Central Europe Development Pathways and the Political Economy of Maladaptation: The Case of Bioenergy as a Climate Strategy in Brazil Production Networks and Innovation in the Semi-periphery: The Transition to Electric Vehicles in South Korea and Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1