写作评估

IF 0.9 Q2 LINGUISTICS Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1075/aral.24027.xua
W. Xuan, Shukun Chen
{"title":"写作评估","authors":"W. Xuan, Shukun Chen","doi":"10.1075/aral.24027.xua","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Evaluative language is crucial in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) writing, particularly in expressing\n authorial stance and supporting arguments. Among various linguistic frameworks, appraisal in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL)\n has been extensively used to map and assess evaluative linguistic features. Since its inception in the early 1990s, appraisal has\n been widely applied to EAP writing studies. This synthesis reviews EAP writing studies using the appraisal framework published\n over the past decades, synthesizing 69 publications. We developed coding schemes based on research questions, focusing on learner\n levels, subjects studied, text type, and generated findings. Our findings indicate that appraisal has been applied by EAP writers\n at different levels to perform a range of functions in their writing. However, previous studies show that there is a lack of\n longitudinal study of appraisal resources used by EAP writers at different levels. We recommend systematic and explicit\n instruction in the use of appraisal resources in EAP writing. Based on our findings, we offer pedagogical\n suggestions for EAP writing and teaching, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of EAP instruction and the quality of student\n writing.","PeriodicalId":43911,"journal":{"name":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing to evaluate\",\"authors\":\"W. Xuan, Shukun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/aral.24027.xua\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Evaluative language is crucial in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) writing, particularly in expressing\\n authorial stance and supporting arguments. Among various linguistic frameworks, appraisal in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL)\\n has been extensively used to map and assess evaluative linguistic features. Since its inception in the early 1990s, appraisal has\\n been widely applied to EAP writing studies. This synthesis reviews EAP writing studies using the appraisal framework published\\n over the past decades, synthesizing 69 publications. We developed coding schemes based on research questions, focusing on learner\\n levels, subjects studied, text type, and generated findings. Our findings indicate that appraisal has been applied by EAP writers\\n at different levels to perform a range of functions in their writing. However, previous studies show that there is a lack of\\n longitudinal study of appraisal resources used by EAP writers at different levels. We recommend systematic and explicit\\n instruction in the use of appraisal resources in EAP writing. Based on our findings, we offer pedagogical\\n suggestions for EAP writing and teaching, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of EAP instruction and the quality of student\\n writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24027.xua\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24027.xua","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评价性语言在学术英语(EAP)写作中至关重要,尤其是在表达作者立场和支持论点方面。在各种语言学框架中,系统功能语言学(SFL)中的评价法被广泛用于绘制和评估评价性语言特点。自 20 世纪 90 年代初问世以来,评价法已被广泛应用于 EAP 写作研究。本综述回顾了过去几十年中使用评估框架进行的 EAP 写作研究,共综合了 69 篇出版物。我们根据研究问题制定了编码方案,重点关注学习者水平、研究对象、文本类型和产生的结果。我们的研究结果表明,不同层次的英语应用文写作者在写作中都会运用评价来实现一系列功能。然而,以往的研究表明,对不同层次的英语应用文写作者所使用的评价资源缺乏纵向研究。我们建议系统、明确地指导学生在 EAP 写作中使用评价资源。基于我们的研究结果,我们为 EAP 写作和教学提供了教学建议,旨在提高 EAP 教学的有效性和学生的写作质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Writing to evaluate
Evaluative language is crucial in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) writing, particularly in expressing authorial stance and supporting arguments. Among various linguistic frameworks, appraisal in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) has been extensively used to map and assess evaluative linguistic features. Since its inception in the early 1990s, appraisal has been widely applied to EAP writing studies. This synthesis reviews EAP writing studies using the appraisal framework published over the past decades, synthesizing 69 publications. We developed coding schemes based on research questions, focusing on learner levels, subjects studied, text type, and generated findings. Our findings indicate that appraisal has been applied by EAP writers at different levels to perform a range of functions in their writing. However, previous studies show that there is a lack of longitudinal study of appraisal resources used by EAP writers at different levels. We recommend systematic and explicit instruction in the use of appraisal resources in EAP writing. Based on our findings, we offer pedagogical suggestions for EAP writing and teaching, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of EAP instruction and the quality of student writing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL) is the preeminent journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (ALAA). ARAL is a peer reviewed journal that promotes scholarly discussion and contemporary understandings of language-related matters with a view to impacting on real-world problems and debates. The journal publishes empirical and theoretical research on language/s in educational, professional, institutional and community settings. ARAL welcomes national and international submissions presenting research related to any of the major sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics as well as transdisciplinary studies. Areas of particular interest include but are not limited to: · Analysis of discourse and interaction · Assessment and evaluation · Bi/multilingualism and bi/multilingual education · Corpus linguistics · Cognitive linguistics · Language, culture and identity · Language maintenance and revitalization · Language planning and policy · Language teaching and learning, including specific languages and TESOL · Pragmatics · Research design and methodology · Second language acquisition · Sociolinguistics · Language and technology · Translating and interpreting.
期刊最新文献
Writing to evaluate One cohort or two? Effects of task repetition with grammatizing on oral task performance and knowledge development Filipino non-native English-speaking teachers and the contradictions in their own backyard The transmission of Spanish as a heritage language in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1