印度尼西亚地震多发国家建筑的灾害风险融资和保险

Hesti Marlina, D. Ruslanjari, Inayah Bastin Al Hakim
{"title":"印度尼西亚地震多发国家建筑的灾害风险融资和保险","authors":"Hesti Marlina, D. Ruslanjari, Inayah Bastin Al Hakim","doi":"10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia situated within the volatile Ring of Fire, faces recurring and devastating earthquakes that pose significant economic threats. The Government of Indonesia (GoI) has initiated a disaster risk financing strategy to address these challenges. However, the implementation of disaster insurance within this strategy remains limited. This study examined the GoI’s disaster risk financing methods, assessed the effectiveness of existing disaster insurance practices, and proposed strategies for improving disaster risk reduction (DRR). Literature review was used to analyse disaster fund and insurance implementation. A building vulnerability simulation, based on Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) P-154 rapid visual screening, determined the appropriate financing strategy. State buildings were assessed using nine vulnerability factors and categorised by seismicity. The research found that disaster financing mostly relied on national funds to cover all disaster damages. Existing disaster insurance lacked clarity in defining insurable buildings, resulting in broad inclusion. Vulnerability assessments showed that each building type exhibited different potential earthquake damage levels. Consequently, insurance coverage is recommended for high-damage categories but discouraged for low to moderately vulnerable buildings.Contribution: This study offered insights into Indonesia’s current disaster risk financing and insurance landscape, and provides a strategic framework for optimising these mechanisms to better protect state buildings from earthquake-related risks.","PeriodicalId":507873,"journal":{"name":"Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","volume":" 76","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disaster risk financing and insurance for earthquake-prone state buildings in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Hesti Marlina, D. Ruslanjari, Inayah Bastin Al Hakim\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indonesia situated within the volatile Ring of Fire, faces recurring and devastating earthquakes that pose significant economic threats. The Government of Indonesia (GoI) has initiated a disaster risk financing strategy to address these challenges. However, the implementation of disaster insurance within this strategy remains limited. This study examined the GoI’s disaster risk financing methods, assessed the effectiveness of existing disaster insurance practices, and proposed strategies for improving disaster risk reduction (DRR). Literature review was used to analyse disaster fund and insurance implementation. A building vulnerability simulation, based on Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) P-154 rapid visual screening, determined the appropriate financing strategy. State buildings were assessed using nine vulnerability factors and categorised by seismicity. The research found that disaster financing mostly relied on national funds to cover all disaster damages. Existing disaster insurance lacked clarity in defining insurable buildings, resulting in broad inclusion. Vulnerability assessments showed that each building type exhibited different potential earthquake damage levels. Consequently, insurance coverage is recommended for high-damage categories but discouraged for low to moderately vulnerable buildings.Contribution: This study offered insights into Indonesia’s current disaster risk financing and insurance landscape, and provides a strategic framework for optimising these mechanisms to better protect state buildings from earthquake-related risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies\",\"volume\":\" 76\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚地处动荡的环太平洋地震带,经常发生破坏性地震,对经济造成严重威胁。印度尼西亚政府(GoI)已经启动了一项灾害风险融资战略来应对这些挑战。然而,灾害保险在该战略中的实施仍然有限。本研究考察了印尼政府的灾害风险融资方法,评估了现有灾害保险实践的有效性,并提出了改进灾害风险降低(DRR)的战略。文献综述用于分析灾害基金和保险的实施情况。根据联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)的 P-154 快速视觉筛选进行了建筑物脆弱性模拟,以确定适当的融资战略。利用九个脆弱性因素对国家建筑物进行了评估,并按地震程度进行了分类。研究发现,灾害融资主要依靠国家基金来支付所有灾害损失。现有的灾害保险对可保建筑的定义不够明确,导致保险范围较广。脆弱性评估显示,每种建筑类型都有不同的潜在地震破坏程度。因此,建议对损坏程度较高的建筑进行投保,但不鼓励对中低脆弱程度的建筑进行投保:本研究有助于深入了解印度尼西亚当前的灾害风险融资和保险状况,并为优化这些机制提供了一个战略框架,以更好地保护国家建筑免受地震相关风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disaster risk financing and insurance for earthquake-prone state buildings in Indonesia
Indonesia situated within the volatile Ring of Fire, faces recurring and devastating earthquakes that pose significant economic threats. The Government of Indonesia (GoI) has initiated a disaster risk financing strategy to address these challenges. However, the implementation of disaster insurance within this strategy remains limited. This study examined the GoI’s disaster risk financing methods, assessed the effectiveness of existing disaster insurance practices, and proposed strategies for improving disaster risk reduction (DRR). Literature review was used to analyse disaster fund and insurance implementation. A building vulnerability simulation, based on Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) P-154 rapid visual screening, determined the appropriate financing strategy. State buildings were assessed using nine vulnerability factors and categorised by seismicity. The research found that disaster financing mostly relied on national funds to cover all disaster damages. Existing disaster insurance lacked clarity in defining insurable buildings, resulting in broad inclusion. Vulnerability assessments showed that each building type exhibited different potential earthquake damage levels. Consequently, insurance coverage is recommended for high-damage categories but discouraged for low to moderately vulnerable buildings.Contribution: This study offered insights into Indonesia’s current disaster risk financing and insurance landscape, and provides a strategic framework for optimising these mechanisms to better protect state buildings from earthquake-related risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding fire regimes: A biogeographical perspective The effect of adaptive capacity on resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country analysis Rethinking Disasters Through Slowness: The Brahmaputra Valley’s Unfolding Transformation Disaster risk financing and insurance for earthquake-prone state buildings in Indonesia Disability-inclusive disaster risk reduction in schools: A confirmatory factor analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1