日耳曼主义者的对决:埃莱梅尔-莫尔(Elemér Moór)、埃莱梅尔-施瓦茨(Elemér Schwartz)和沃尔特-施泰因豪泽尔(Walter Steinhauser)关于布尔根兰州人口史的辩论

IF 10.4 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Hungarian Studies Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1556/044.2023.00244
László Dávid Törő
{"title":"日耳曼主义者的对决:埃莱梅尔-莫尔(Elemér Moór)、埃莱梅尔-施瓦茨(Elemér Schwartz)和沃尔特-施泰因豪泽尔(Walter Steinhauser)关于布尔根兰州人口史的辩论","authors":"László Dávid Törő","doi":"10.1556/044.2023.00244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I focus my attention on the debate between three renowned Germanists of the interwar period: Elemér Moór, Elemér Schwartz and Walter Steinhauser. Their discussion of the population history of Burgenland can serve as a case study of knowledge production. This was a discourse in which the relationship between science and politics or the boundary between scholarship and dilettantism were often tested. Relying on both published material (their books and papers) and unpublished sources (correspondence, commission reports) I analyse the different standpoints of the three scholars and show the development of their rivalry. At the end of my paper, I will draw some lessons concerning the history of historical writing.","PeriodicalId":35072,"journal":{"name":"Hungarian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duel of Germanists: The debate between Elemér Moór, Elemér Schwartz and Walter Steinhauser about the population history of Burgenland\",\"authors\":\"László Dávid Törő\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/044.2023.00244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I focus my attention on the debate between three renowned Germanists of the interwar period: Elemér Moór, Elemér Schwartz and Walter Steinhauser. Their discussion of the population history of Burgenland can serve as a case study of knowledge production. This was a discourse in which the relationship between science and politics or the boundary between scholarship and dilettantism were often tested. Relying on both published material (their books and papers) and unpublished sources (correspondence, commission reports) I analyse the different standpoints of the three scholars and show the development of their rivalry. At the end of my paper, I will draw some lessons concerning the history of historical writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hungarian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hungarian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/044.2023.00244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hungarian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/044.2023.00244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我将重点讨论战时三位著名德国学家之间的争论:莫尔(Elemér Moór)、施瓦茨(Elemér Schwartz)和施泰因豪泽(Walter Steinhauser)之间的争论。他们对布尔根兰州人口史的讨论可作为知识生产的案例研究。在他们的论述中,科学与政治之间的关系或学术与业余之间的界限经常受到考验。根据已发表的资料(他们的著作和论文)和未发表的资料(通信、委员会报告),我分析了三位学者的不同观点,并展示了他们之间竞争的发展过程。在本文的最后,我将总结一些有关历史写作史的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Duel of Germanists: The debate between Elemér Moór, Elemér Schwartz and Walter Steinhauser about the population history of Burgenland
In this paper I focus my attention on the debate between three renowned Germanists of the interwar period: Elemér Moór, Elemér Schwartz and Walter Steinhauser. Their discussion of the population history of Burgenland can serve as a case study of knowledge production. This was a discourse in which the relationship between science and politics or the boundary between scholarship and dilettantism were often tested. Relying on both published material (their books and papers) and unpublished sources (correspondence, commission reports) I analyse the different standpoints of the three scholars and show the development of their rivalry. At the end of my paper, I will draw some lessons concerning the history of historical writing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hungarian Studies
Hungarian Studies Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Hungarian Studies intends to fill a long-felt need in the coverage of Hungarian studies by offering an independent, international forum for original papers of high scholarly standards within all disciplines of the humanities and social sciences (literature, philology, ethnology, folklore, musicology, art history, philosophy, history, sociology, etc.) pertaining to any aspects of the Hungarian past or present. In addition, every issue will carry short communications, book reviews and miscellaneous information - all features of interest to the widening audience of Hungarian studies. Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
Das publizistische Werk von Adolf Silberstein-Ötvös in der ungarländischen deutschsprachigen Presse im Überblick Pure love in the Confessions of Ferenc Rákóczi II Júlia Hajdu (1925–1987) – Career of a woman operetta composer „Wer um alles in der Welt ist Pom-Pom?” Duel of Germanists: The debate between Elemér Moór, Elemér Schwartz and Walter Steinhauser about the population history of Burgenland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1