Chiari I 型畸形产妇的麻醉管理:回顾性病例系列和文献综述

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY International journal of obstetric anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104232
{"title":"Chiari I 型畸形产妇的麻醉管理:回顾性病例系列和文献综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The peripartum management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation remains a challenge due to the degree of cerebellar tonsillar herniation and a paucity of published evidence. There is concern about neuraxial anaesthetic blocks and uncertainty regarding the optimum mode of delivery.</p><p>We systematically searched the literature for the obstetric management of patients with Chiari type I malformation, independent of publication date and language. We also searched our local hospital database from December 2009 to December 2022 for all deliveries to patients with this condition. We identified 137 cases comprising 103 deliveries described in 40 publications that met our inclusion criteria; 34 deliveries were identified in our local database. There were 84 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 52 caesarean deliveries, and one delivery by unknown modality. Sixty neuraxial blocks were performed; approximately half of these were epidural procedures for labour analgesia. Six patients had new or worsened symptoms following delivery, but it is unclear whether these were related to their Chiari malformation. We identified no cases with brainstem herniation or severe symptoms.</p><p>We discuss our findings in relation to other published literature and address the concerns described. Our review reveals the use of a variety of modes of delivery and anaesthetic techniques and that most patients suffered no neurological complication. We conclude there is no of evidence to avoid any one approach to labour analgesia, delivery and anaesthesia. We propose a holistic, individualised and patient-centred approach with an appraisal of the risks and benefits to support shared-decision making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaesthetic management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation: a retrospective case series and literature review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The peripartum management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation remains a challenge due to the degree of cerebellar tonsillar herniation and a paucity of published evidence. There is concern about neuraxial anaesthetic blocks and uncertainty regarding the optimum mode of delivery.</p><p>We systematically searched the literature for the obstetric management of patients with Chiari type I malformation, independent of publication date and language. We also searched our local hospital database from December 2009 to December 2022 for all deliveries to patients with this condition. We identified 137 cases comprising 103 deliveries described in 40 publications that met our inclusion criteria; 34 deliveries were identified in our local database. There were 84 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 52 caesarean deliveries, and one delivery by unknown modality. Sixty neuraxial blocks were performed; approximately half of these were epidural procedures for labour analgesia. Six patients had new or worsened symptoms following delivery, but it is unclear whether these were related to their Chiari malformation. We identified no cases with brainstem herniation or severe symptoms.</p><p>We discuss our findings in relation to other published literature and address the concerns described. Our review reveals the use of a variety of modes of delivery and anaesthetic techniques and that most patients suffered no neurological complication. We conclude there is no of evidence to avoid any one approach to labour analgesia, delivery and anaesthesia. We propose a holistic, individualised and patient-centred approach with an appraisal of the risks and benefits to support shared-decision making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24002449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24002449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于小脑扁桃体疝的程度和已发表证据的匮乏,对患有 Chiari I 型畸形的产科患者进行围产期管理仍是一项挑战。我们系统地检索了有关I型脊柱畸形患者产科管理的文献,这些文献不受发表日期和语言的限制。我们还检索了本地医院数据库中 2009 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月期间所有此类患者的分娩情况。我们发现了 137 例符合纳入标准的病例,其中包括 40 篇出版物中描述的 103 例分娩;本地数据库中还发现了 34 例分娩。其中 84 例为阴道自然分娩,52 例为剖腹产,1 例分娩方式不明。共进行了 60 次神经阻滞,其中约一半是用于分娩镇痛的硬膜外手术。六名患者在分娩后出现了新的症状或症状加重,但尚不清楚这些症状是否与恰里畸形有关。我们没有发现脑干疝或严重症状的病例。我们结合其他已发表的文献讨论了我们的研究结果,并解决了所述的问题。我们的综述显示使用了多种分娩方式和麻醉技术,大多数患者没有出现神经系统并发症。我们的结论是,没有证据表明分娩镇痛、分娩和麻醉应避免使用任何一种方法。我们建议采用整体、个性化和以患者为中心的方法,并对风险和益处进行评估,以支持共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anaesthetic management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation: a retrospective case series and literature review

The peripartum management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation remains a challenge due to the degree of cerebellar tonsillar herniation and a paucity of published evidence. There is concern about neuraxial anaesthetic blocks and uncertainty regarding the optimum mode of delivery.

We systematically searched the literature for the obstetric management of patients with Chiari type I malformation, independent of publication date and language. We also searched our local hospital database from December 2009 to December 2022 for all deliveries to patients with this condition. We identified 137 cases comprising 103 deliveries described in 40 publications that met our inclusion criteria; 34 deliveries were identified in our local database. There were 84 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 52 caesarean deliveries, and one delivery by unknown modality. Sixty neuraxial blocks were performed; approximately half of these were epidural procedures for labour analgesia. Six patients had new or worsened symptoms following delivery, but it is unclear whether these were related to their Chiari malformation. We identified no cases with brainstem herniation or severe symptoms.

We discuss our findings in relation to other published literature and address the concerns described. Our review reveals the use of a variety of modes of delivery and anaesthetic techniques and that most patients suffered no neurological complication. We conclude there is no of evidence to avoid any one approach to labour analgesia, delivery and anaesthesia. We propose a holistic, individualised and patient-centred approach with an appraisal of the risks and benefits to support shared-decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
期刊最新文献
Pain during caesarean delivery: what gets measured, gets managed Obstetric hemorrhage risk assessment using the maximum allowable blood loss calculation: are we on the right track? Anaesthetic considerations for impacted fetal head at caesarean delivery: a focused review Impact of an interdisciplinary process to increase utilization of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A retrospective database analysis Transcutaneous electrical acupuncture point stimulation and quality of recovery following cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1