教师专业发展计划对小学生阅读能力的影响:元分析研究

Alexandra Petra Venter, Marian D. Ilie, Andrei Rusu
{"title":"教师专业发展计划对小学生阅读能力的影响:元分析研究","authors":"Alexandra Petra Venter, Marian D. Ilie, Andrei Rusu","doi":"10.26755/revped/2024.1/55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current meta-analysis evaluated the impact of teacher professional development programs (TPDP) on student reading skills for non-struggling readers and struggling readers from the preparatory grade to the fourth grade in general education. We analyzed 15 randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies that focused on professional development of primary school teachers and measured code-focused, meaning-focused, or general reading skills at primary school students level. We also explored if the elements of study design, characteristics of the participants, features of the TPDP, outcomes measured, or context of the study are potential moderators of the effects. Results indicate that TPDP have a statistically non-significant general effect size (k = 15, d = 0.068, SE = 0.049, Z = 1.394, p = .162) but a significantly small effect size (d = 0.201, SE = 0.078, Z = 2.574, p = .010) in the case of fourth grade students. We did not identify publication bias. Classical programs rather than hybrid programs (that also include coaching, mentoring, or feedback sessions) as well as a smaller number of program sessions seem to be more effective. Future research is necessary to identify effective features of TPDP and the impact on the teachers’ teaching skills.","PeriodicalId":346977,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pedagogy - Revista de Pedagogie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE IMPACT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS OF TEACHERS ON THE READING SKILLS OF PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: A META-ANALYTIC STUDY\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Petra Venter, Marian D. Ilie, Andrei Rusu\",\"doi\":\"10.26755/revped/2024.1/55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current meta-analysis evaluated the impact of teacher professional development programs (TPDP) on student reading skills for non-struggling readers and struggling readers from the preparatory grade to the fourth grade in general education. We analyzed 15 randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies that focused on professional development of primary school teachers and measured code-focused, meaning-focused, or general reading skills at primary school students level. We also explored if the elements of study design, characteristics of the participants, features of the TPDP, outcomes measured, or context of the study are potential moderators of the effects. Results indicate that TPDP have a statistically non-significant general effect size (k = 15, d = 0.068, SE = 0.049, Z = 1.394, p = .162) but a significantly small effect size (d = 0.201, SE = 0.078, Z = 2.574, p = .010) in the case of fourth grade students. We did not identify publication bias. Classical programs rather than hybrid programs (that also include coaching, mentoring, or feedback sessions) as well as a smaller number of program sessions seem to be more effective. Future research is necessary to identify effective features of TPDP and the impact on the teachers’ teaching skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pedagogy - Revista de Pedagogie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pedagogy - Revista de Pedagogie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26755/revped/2024.1/55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pedagogy - Revista de Pedagogie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26755/revped/2024.1/55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的荟萃分析评估了教师专业发展项目(TPDP)对普通教育中预备年级至四年级非学困生和学困生阅读技能的影响。我们分析了 15 项随机对照试验和准实验研究,这些研究侧重于小学教师的专业发展,并测量了小学生的代码焦点、意义焦点或一般阅读技能。我们还探讨了研究设计的要素、参与者的特征、教师专业发展方案的特点、测量的结果或研究的背景是否是影响效果的潜在调节因素。结果表明,TPDP 在统计学上没有显著的一般效应大小(k = 15,d = 0.068,SE = 0.049,Z = 1.394,p = .162),但在四年级学生中却有显著的小效应大小(d = 0.201,SE = 0.078,Z = 2.574,p = .010)。我们没有发现出版偏差。经典项目而非混合项目(也包括辅导、指导或反馈课程)以及较少次数的项目似乎更有效。今后有必要开展研究,以确定 TPDP 的有效特征及其对教师教学技能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE IMPACT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS OF TEACHERS ON THE READING SKILLS OF PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: A META-ANALYTIC STUDY
The current meta-analysis evaluated the impact of teacher professional development programs (TPDP) on student reading skills for non-struggling readers and struggling readers from the preparatory grade to the fourth grade in general education. We analyzed 15 randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies that focused on professional development of primary school teachers and measured code-focused, meaning-focused, or general reading skills at primary school students level. We also explored if the elements of study design, characteristics of the participants, features of the TPDP, outcomes measured, or context of the study are potential moderators of the effects. Results indicate that TPDP have a statistically non-significant general effect size (k = 15, d = 0.068, SE = 0.049, Z = 1.394, p = .162) but a significantly small effect size (d = 0.201, SE = 0.078, Z = 2.574, p = .010) in the case of fourth grade students. We did not identify publication bias. Classical programs rather than hybrid programs (that also include coaching, mentoring, or feedback sessions) as well as a smaller number of program sessions seem to be more effective. Future research is necessary to identify effective features of TPDP and the impact on the teachers’ teaching skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR INITIAL TEACHER TRAINING IN PLAYFUL PEDAGOGY PRE-PRIMARY STUDENT TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON REFLECTIVE JOURNALING TRAINING NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PISA RESULTS BEYOND RANKINGS: WHY DON’T ROMANIAN STUDENTS READ WELL?| GABRIELA HUM (ED.), LEARNING BY SHARING. A GUIDE TO EXPERIENCES FROM AND FOR L&D SPECIALISTS. Bucharest, TREI Publishing House, 2021, 348 pages, ISBN 978-606-40-1012-4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1