阿比特龙、恩扎鲁胺和卡巴齐他赛一线和二线治疗转移性阉割耐药前列腺癌的真实数据--葡萄牙的一项多中心研究

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102169
Francisco Botelho , Isaac Braga , Ricardo Leão , Frederico Teves , Jorge Dias , Filipe Rodrigues , Jorge Oliveira , Isabel Augusto , Catarina Portela , Joana Febra , Sandra Custódio , Patrícia Liu , Patrícia Gago , André Miranda , Carlos Silva , Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
{"title":"阿比特龙、恩扎鲁胺和卡巴齐他赛一线和二线治疗转移性阉割耐药前列腺癌的真实数据--葡萄牙的一项多中心研究","authors":"Francisco Botelho ,&nbsp;Isaac Braga ,&nbsp;Ricardo Leão ,&nbsp;Frederico Teves ,&nbsp;Jorge Dias ,&nbsp;Filipe Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Jorge Oliveira ,&nbsp;Isabel Augusto ,&nbsp;Catarina Portela ,&nbsp;Joana Febra ,&nbsp;Sandra Custódio ,&nbsp;Patrícia Liu ,&nbsp;Patrícia Gago ,&nbsp;André Miranda ,&nbsp;Carlos Silva ,&nbsp;Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>New drugs for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were approved, first in the pos-docetaxel and then in the pre-docetaxel setting. We aim to assess the real daily practice benefit of abiraterone (Abi), enzalutamide (Enz) and cabazitaxel (Cab) in patients with mCRPC, compare it with RCT results and compare Abi vs Enz.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively collected the data of all consecutive mCRPC patients treated with Abi, Enz or Cab in the six major oncological hospitals in the north of Portugal until December 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 470 treatments pre-docetaxel (163 Abi and 307 Enz) and 373 pos-docetaxel (160 Abi, 148 Enz and 59 Cab) were included, with median follow-up time of 35 months. Mean age was 73.1, 84.4% had ECOG status &lt; 2, ISUP grade was ≥ 4 in 59% and 28.0% had oligometastatic disease. In first line, for Abi and for Enz respectively, the proportion of patients with PSA reduction &gt; 50% was 64.4% and 80.4% (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), the mean duration of treatment (DT) was 10 and 14 months (<em>P</em> = .037) and the median overall survival (OS) was 25 months and 30 months (<em>P</em> = .17). In second line the results for Abi, Enz and Cab were respectively: proportion of patients with PSA reduction &gt; 50% was 40.4%, 57.4% and 24.6% (p for Abi vs Enz=0.004); DT was 7, 8, and 3 months (p for Abi vs Enz = 0.27); OS was 17, 22 and 10 months (p for Abi vs. Enz = 0,07).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These drugs have good efficacy in real-world evidence, similar to those reported in randomized clinical trials, with the expected exception of lower OS due to the inclusion of a broader sample of patients. Our results add to the evidence that Enz might have better efficacy in this setting compared with Abi.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-life Data on First- and Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Abiraterone, Enzalutamide and Cabazitaxel – A multicentric Study From Portugal\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Botelho ,&nbsp;Isaac Braga ,&nbsp;Ricardo Leão ,&nbsp;Frederico Teves ,&nbsp;Jorge Dias ,&nbsp;Filipe Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Jorge Oliveira ,&nbsp;Isabel Augusto ,&nbsp;Catarina Portela ,&nbsp;Joana Febra ,&nbsp;Sandra Custódio ,&nbsp;Patrícia Liu ,&nbsp;Patrícia Gago ,&nbsp;André Miranda ,&nbsp;Carlos Silva ,&nbsp;Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>New drugs for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were approved, first in the pos-docetaxel and then in the pre-docetaxel setting. We aim to assess the real daily practice benefit of abiraterone (Abi), enzalutamide (Enz) and cabazitaxel (Cab) in patients with mCRPC, compare it with RCT results and compare Abi vs Enz.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively collected the data of all consecutive mCRPC patients treated with Abi, Enz or Cab in the six major oncological hospitals in the north of Portugal until December 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 470 treatments pre-docetaxel (163 Abi and 307 Enz) and 373 pos-docetaxel (160 Abi, 148 Enz and 59 Cab) were included, with median follow-up time of 35 months. Mean age was 73.1, 84.4% had ECOG status &lt; 2, ISUP grade was ≥ 4 in 59% and 28.0% had oligometastatic disease. In first line, for Abi and for Enz respectively, the proportion of patients with PSA reduction &gt; 50% was 64.4% and 80.4% (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), the mean duration of treatment (DT) was 10 and 14 months (<em>P</em> = .037) and the median overall survival (OS) was 25 months and 30 months (<em>P</em> = .17). In second line the results for Abi, Enz and Cab were respectively: proportion of patients with PSA reduction &gt; 50% was 40.4%, 57.4% and 24.6% (p for Abi vs Enz=0.004); DT was 7, 8, and 3 months (p for Abi vs Enz = 0.27); OS was 17, 22 and 10 months (p for Abi vs. Enz = 0,07).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These drugs have good efficacy in real-world evidence, similar to those reported in randomized clinical trials, with the expected exception of lower OS due to the inclusion of a broader sample of patients. Our results add to the evidence that Enz might have better efficacy in this setting compared with Abi.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155876732400140X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155876732400140X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的 治疗转移性阉割耐药前列腺癌(mCRPC)的新药已获批准,首先是在多西他赛前使用,然后是在多西他赛前使用。我们旨在评估阿比特龙(Abi)、恩扎鲁胺(Enz)和卡巴齐他赛(Cab)在mCRPC患者中的实际日常治疗效果,将其与RCT结果进行比较,并比较Abi与Enz。材料与方法我们回顾性收集了葡萄牙北部六家主要肿瘤医院截至2020年12月接受阿比、恩佐胺或卡巴齐他赛治疗的所有连续mCRPC患者的数据。结果共纳入470例多西他赛前治疗(163例阿比和307例恩佐胺)和373例多西他赛后治疗(160例阿比、148例恩佐胺和59例卡巴齐他赛),中位随访时间为35个月。平均年龄为73.1岁,84.4%的患者ECOG状态为2级,59%的患者ISUP分级≥4级,28.0%的患者患有少转移性疾病。在一线治疗中,Abi 和 Enz 的 PSA 降低 50%的患者比例分别为 64.4% 和 80.4%(P < .001),平均治疗时间(DT)分别为 10 个月和 14 个月(P = .037),中位总生存期(OS)分别为 25 个月和 30 个月(P = .17)。在二线治疗中,Abi、Enz和Cab的结果分别为:PSA降低50%的患者比例分别为40.4%、57.4%和24.6%(Abi vs Enz的P=0.004);DT分别为7、8和3个月(Abi vs Enz的P=0.27);OS分别为17、22和10个月(Abi vs Enz的P=0.07)。结论这些药物在真实世界中具有良好的疗效,与随机临床试验报告的疗效相似,但由于纳入了更广泛的患者样本,预期的例外情况是OS较低。我们的研究结果进一步证明,在这种情况下,Enz的疗效可能优于Abi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-life Data on First- and Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Abiraterone, Enzalutamide and Cabazitaxel – A multicentric Study From Portugal

Introduction and objectives

New drugs for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were approved, first in the pos-docetaxel and then in the pre-docetaxel setting. We aim to assess the real daily practice benefit of abiraterone (Abi), enzalutamide (Enz) and cabazitaxel (Cab) in patients with mCRPC, compare it with RCT results and compare Abi vs Enz.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively collected the data of all consecutive mCRPC patients treated with Abi, Enz or Cab in the six major oncological hospitals in the north of Portugal until December 2020.

Results

A total of 470 treatments pre-docetaxel (163 Abi and 307 Enz) and 373 pos-docetaxel (160 Abi, 148 Enz and 59 Cab) were included, with median follow-up time of 35 months. Mean age was 73.1, 84.4% had ECOG status < 2, ISUP grade was ≥ 4 in 59% and 28.0% had oligometastatic disease. In first line, for Abi and for Enz respectively, the proportion of patients with PSA reduction > 50% was 64.4% and 80.4% (P < .001), the mean duration of treatment (DT) was 10 and 14 months (P = .037) and the median overall survival (OS) was 25 months and 30 months (P = .17). In second line the results for Abi, Enz and Cab were respectively: proportion of patients with PSA reduction > 50% was 40.4%, 57.4% and 24.6% (p for Abi vs Enz=0.004); DT was 7, 8, and 3 months (p for Abi vs Enz = 0.27); OS was 17, 22 and 10 months (p for Abi vs. Enz = 0,07).

Conclusion

These drugs have good efficacy in real-world evidence, similar to those reported in randomized clinical trials, with the expected exception of lower OS due to the inclusion of a broader sample of patients. Our results add to the evidence that Enz might have better efficacy in this setting compared with Abi.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1