R-Index:评估研究人员对同行评审贡献的标准

Milad Malekzadeh
{"title":"R-Index:评估研究人员对同行评审贡献的标准","authors":"Milad Malekzadeh","doi":"arxiv-2407.19949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I propose the R-Index, defined as the difference between the sum of review\nresponsibilities for a researcher's publications and the number of reviews they\nhave completed, as a novel metric to effectively characterize a researcher's\ncontribution to the peer review process. This index aims to balance the demands\nplaced on the peer review system by a researcher's publication output with\ntheir engagement in reviewing others' work, providing a measure of whether they\nare giving back to the academic community commensurately with their own\npublication demands. The R-Index offers a straightforward and fair approach to\nencourage equitable participation in peer review, thereby supporting the\nsustainability and efficiency of the scholarly publishing process.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review\",\"authors\":\"Milad Malekzadeh\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.19949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I propose the R-Index, defined as the difference between the sum of review\\nresponsibilities for a researcher's publications and the number of reviews they\\nhave completed, as a novel metric to effectively characterize a researcher's\\ncontribution to the peer review process. This index aims to balance the demands\\nplaced on the peer review system by a researcher's publication output with\\ntheir engagement in reviewing others' work, providing a measure of whether they\\nare giving back to the academic community commensurately with their own\\npublication demands. The R-Index offers a straightforward and fair approach to\\nencourage equitable participation in peer review, thereby supporting the\\nsustainability and efficiency of the scholarly publishing process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我提出了 "R 指数"(R-Index),它的定义是研究人员的出版物审稿责任总和与其完成的审稿数量之差,是有效描述研究人员对同行评议过程的贡献的新指标。该指数旨在平衡研究人员的出版物产出对同行评审系统的要求和他们对他人工作的评审参与度,提供了一个衡量研究人员对学术界的回馈是否与其自身的出版物需求相称的标准。R-Index 提供了一种直接而公平的方法来鼓励公平参与同行评审,从而支持学术出版过程的可持续性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review
I propose the R-Index, defined as the difference between the sum of review responsibilities for a researcher's publications and the number of reviews they have completed, as a novel metric to effectively characterize a researcher's contribution to the peer review process. This index aims to balance the demands placed on the peer review system by a researcher's publication output with their engagement in reviewing others' work, providing a measure of whether they are giving back to the academic community commensurately with their own publication demands. The R-Index offers a straightforward and fair approach to encourage equitable participation in peer review, thereby supporting the sustainability and efficiency of the scholarly publishing process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1