墨西哥湾金线鱼种群数量的时空模式

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Marine and Coastal Fisheries Pub Date : 2024-07-28 DOI:10.1002/mcf2.10299
Greta J. Helmueller, Christopher D. Stallings, Steven A. Murawski, Linda A. Lombardi-Carlson
{"title":"墨西哥湾金线鱼种群数量的时空模式","authors":"Greta J. Helmueller,&nbsp;Christopher D. Stallings,&nbsp;Steven A. Murawski,&nbsp;Linda A. Lombardi-Carlson","doi":"10.1002/mcf2.10299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objectives of this study were to compare population dynamics of Tilefish <i>Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps</i> before and after the 2010 <i>Deepwater Horizon</i> (DWH) oil spill in the north-central Gulf of Mexico (GoM) as well as inside and outside the spill area in the western and southwestern GoM (off Mexico).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Due to the availability of prespill samples of Tilefish, we were able to evaluate growth, mortality, and condition factors during two time periods (2000–2009 versus 2011–2017). Samples were derived from commercial landings and research vessel surveys using demersal longline fishing gear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result</h3>\n \n <p>Although some von Bertalanffy growth parameters differed for fish caught before and after the spill within the spill area, confidence limits for predicted growth curves overlapped for ages &gt;10, while predicted growth for ages &lt;10 declined somewhat after the spill. Tilefish grew faster off Mexico than in the northern GoM. Total instantaneous mortality rates (<i>Z</i>), estimated from aggregate multi-year catch curves, were highest off Mexico (0.39 ± 0.05 SE), lowest in the western GoM outside the spill area (0.21 ± 0.03), and similar before and after the DWH spill within the spill zone (0.32 ± 0.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although <i>Z</i> on the stock within the spill area apparently did not change, differences in fishing mortality may have compensated for changes in natural mortality. Because 90% of the fish that were aged after the spill were alive prior to the spill, their accumulated growth history may have masked postspill growth changes. As we are now 14+ years past the 2010 spill, comparisons of population dynamics from samples collected now and in the future may provide a clearer picture of the strength of incoming year-classes and the long-term implications of the spill on Tilefish populations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51257,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Coastal Fisheries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mcf2.10299","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal and spatial patterns in population demography of Tilefish in the Gulf of Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Greta J. Helmueller,&nbsp;Christopher D. Stallings,&nbsp;Steven A. Murawski,&nbsp;Linda A. Lombardi-Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mcf2.10299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objectives of this study were to compare population dynamics of Tilefish <i>Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps</i> before and after the 2010 <i>Deepwater Horizon</i> (DWH) oil spill in the north-central Gulf of Mexico (GoM) as well as inside and outside the spill area in the western and southwestern GoM (off Mexico).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Due to the availability of prespill samples of Tilefish, we were able to evaluate growth, mortality, and condition factors during two time periods (2000–2009 versus 2011–2017). Samples were derived from commercial landings and research vessel surveys using demersal longline fishing gear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Result</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although some von Bertalanffy growth parameters differed for fish caught before and after the spill within the spill area, confidence limits for predicted growth curves overlapped for ages &gt;10, while predicted growth for ages &lt;10 declined somewhat after the spill. Tilefish grew faster off Mexico than in the northern GoM. Total instantaneous mortality rates (<i>Z</i>), estimated from aggregate multi-year catch curves, were highest off Mexico (0.39 ± 0.05 SE), lowest in the western GoM outside the spill area (0.21 ± 0.03), and similar before and after the DWH spill within the spill zone (0.32 ± 0.02).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although <i>Z</i> on the stock within the spill area apparently did not change, differences in fishing mortality may have compensated for changes in natural mortality. Because 90% of the fish that were aged after the spill were alive prior to the spill, their accumulated growth history may have masked postspill growth changes. As we are now 14+ years past the 2010 spill, comparisons of population dynamics from samples collected now and in the future may provide a clearer picture of the strength of incoming year-classes and the long-term implications of the spill on Tilefish populations.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine and Coastal Fisheries\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mcf2.10299\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine and Coastal Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcf2.10299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Coastal Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcf2.10299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较 2010 年深水地平线(DWH)漏油事件前后墨西哥湾(GoM)中北部以及墨西哥湾西部和西南部(墨西哥近海)漏油区域内外的金线鱼(Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps)的种群动态。方法由于获得了漏油前的金线鱼样本,我们能够评估两个时间段(2000-2009 年和 2011-2017 年)的生长、死亡率和状态因子。结果虽然泄漏前后在泄漏区域内捕获的鱼类的一些 von Bertalanffy 生长参数不同,但预测生长曲线的置信区间在年龄 >10 时重叠,而预测年龄 <10 的生长在泄漏后有所下降。墨西哥近海的瓦虱鱼生长速度快于北戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫地区。根据多年总渔获量曲线估算的瞬时总死亡率(Z)在墨西哥近海最高(0.39 ± 0.05 SE),在泄漏区外的墨西哥湾西部最低(0.21 ± 0.03),在泄漏区内的 DWH 泄漏前后相近(0.32 ± 0.02)。由于 90% 的泄漏后老龄鱼在泄漏前还活着,它们累积的生长历史可能掩盖了泄漏后的生长变化。由于 2010 年泄漏事件已经过去了 14 年多,对现在和未来收集的样本进行种群动态比较,可能会更清楚地了解流入年级的强度以及泄漏事件对瓦氏鱼种群的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal and spatial patterns in population demography of Tilefish in the Gulf of Mexico

Objective

The objectives of this study were to compare population dynamics of Tilefish Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps before and after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill in the north-central Gulf of Mexico (GoM) as well as inside and outside the spill area in the western and southwestern GoM (off Mexico).

Methods

Due to the availability of prespill samples of Tilefish, we were able to evaluate growth, mortality, and condition factors during two time periods (2000–2009 versus 2011–2017). Samples were derived from commercial landings and research vessel surveys using demersal longline fishing gear.

Result

Although some von Bertalanffy growth parameters differed for fish caught before and after the spill within the spill area, confidence limits for predicted growth curves overlapped for ages >10, while predicted growth for ages <10 declined somewhat after the spill. Tilefish grew faster off Mexico than in the northern GoM. Total instantaneous mortality rates (Z), estimated from aggregate multi-year catch curves, were highest off Mexico (0.39 ± 0.05 SE), lowest in the western GoM outside the spill area (0.21 ± 0.03), and similar before and after the DWH spill within the spill zone (0.32 ± 0.02).

Conclusion

Although Z on the stock within the spill area apparently did not change, differences in fishing mortality may have compensated for changes in natural mortality. Because 90% of the fish that were aged after the spill were alive prior to the spill, their accumulated growth history may have masked postspill growth changes. As we are now 14+ years past the 2010 spill, comparisons of population dynamics from samples collected now and in the future may provide a clearer picture of the strength of incoming year-classes and the long-term implications of the spill on Tilefish populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Marine and Coastal Fisheries FISHERIES-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science publishes original and innovative research that synthesizes information on biological organization across spatial and temporal scales to promote ecologically sound fisheries science and management. This open-access, online journal published by the American Fisheries Society provides an international venue for studies of marine, coastal, and estuarine fisheries, with emphasis on species'' performance and responses to perturbations in their environment, and promotes the development of ecosystem-based fisheries science and management.
期刊最新文献
Spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs in the Georges Bank and Mid-Atlantic Bight regions during 1968–2021 Shifting spawning phenology in Hudson River American Shad Erratum Evaluating the conservation benefit of circle hooks for the Atlantic Striped Bass recreational fishery Analysis of fishing intensity in the South China Sea based on automatic identification system data: A comparison between China and Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1