Cost-effectiveness Analysis of COMT-inhibitors as Adjuvant Treatments to Levodopa in Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease

Purpose

We aimed to elicit scientific evidence on the cost-effectiveness of two catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (COMT-i) versus no COMT-i in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.

Methods

A mixed model of the decision tree and a Markov model with three health states by OFF-time level (<25%, ≥25%, and death) was constructed to compare opicapone (OPC), entacapone (ENT), and no COMT-i over a lifetime. A hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients was created and simulated based on the characteristics of the BIPARK trial subjects.

Findings

Two COMT-i (OPC and ENT) were identified as a cost-effective option compared to no COMT-i. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that over 90% of the simulations proved the robust cost-effectiveness of COMT-i. When the time horizon as the most influential factor decreases to a 5- and 10-year period, COMT-i can be a cost-saving option. Although ENT may be the preferred option over OPC economically because of its lower price, OPC can be acceptable if the drug price is reduced by 17%.

Implications

Add-on treatment with COMT-i in patients with PD receiving levodopa/carbidopa appears to be cost-saving compared with not using COMT-i. In the future, it is necessary to evaluate the economic evaluation of COMT-i based on long-term real-world evidence.