急诊科住院时间:社区医院倡议。

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1097/TME.0000000000000525
Johnette K Bennage, Cassandra D Ford, Christina J Ezemenaka, Tamara F Persing
{"title":"急诊科住院时间:社区医院倡议。","authors":"Johnette K Bennage, Cassandra D Ford, Christina J Ezemenaka, Tamara F Persing","doi":"10.1097/TME.0000000000000525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement initiative was conducted to determine if a provider in triage and split flow model could decrease the length of stay (LOS) of discharged patients seen in a community hospital emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended LOSs within the ED lead to delays in the care of patients, increase the number of patients who leave without being seen by a provider, decrease patient satisfaction, and cause a loss of revenue for health care organizations. Using a provider in triage and a split flow model, where patients can be seen and dispositioned without delays, can improve ED throughput and decrease the overall LOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a structured, interdisciplinary approach using the Plan-Do-Study-Act Shewhart Cycle of Process Improvement, a provider was placed in triage, and an interior waiting room was used to evaluate emergency severity index level 3 and 4 patients to expedite diagnostic testing and perform procedures. This model allowed lower acuity patients to be cared for separately from higher acuity patients, who were being treated in the main ED. In addition, the median arrival to provider, arrival to bed, and LOS from arrival to departure of discharged patients were compared to the current departmental processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant improvement in the LOS of discharged patients and the time of arrival to triage, arrival to bed, and arrival to provider using a provider in triage and a split flow model compared to the current intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a provider in triage and a split flow model can demonstrate a decrease in the LOS of discharged patients along with other ED metrics and improve efficiencies in patient care within a community hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":45446,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Community Hospital Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Johnette K Bennage, Cassandra D Ford, Christina J Ezemenaka, Tamara F Persing\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TME.0000000000000525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement initiative was conducted to determine if a provider in triage and split flow model could decrease the length of stay (LOS) of discharged patients seen in a community hospital emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended LOSs within the ED lead to delays in the care of patients, increase the number of patients who leave without being seen by a provider, decrease patient satisfaction, and cause a loss of revenue for health care organizations. Using a provider in triage and a split flow model, where patients can be seen and dispositioned without delays, can improve ED throughput and decrease the overall LOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a structured, interdisciplinary approach using the Plan-Do-Study-Act Shewhart Cycle of Process Improvement, a provider was placed in triage, and an interior waiting room was used to evaluate emergency severity index level 3 and 4 patients to expedite diagnostic testing and perform procedures. This model allowed lower acuity patients to be cared for separately from higher acuity patients, who were being treated in the main ED. In addition, the median arrival to provider, arrival to bed, and LOS from arrival to departure of discharged patients were compared to the current departmental processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant improvement in the LOS of discharged patients and the time of arrival to triage, arrival to bed, and arrival to provider using a provider in triage and a split flow model compared to the current intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a provider in triage and a split flow model can demonstrate a decrease in the LOS of discharged patients along with other ED metrics and improve efficiencies in patient care within a community hospital.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0000000000000525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0000000000000525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:开展质量改进活动,以确定分诊和分流模式能否缩短社区医院急诊科出院患者的住院时间:这项质量改进计划旨在确定分诊和分流模式能否缩短社区医院急诊科(ED)出院病人的住院时间(LOS):背景:延长急诊科病人的住院时间会延误对病人的治疗,增加未得到医疗服务提供者诊治而离开的病人数量,降低病人的满意度,并造成医疗机构的收入损失。使用医护人员分诊和分流模式,让患者在没有延误的情况下得到诊治和处置,可以提高急诊室的吞吐量,减少总体的 LOS:方法:通过采用 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "薛华流程改进循环的结构化跨学科方法,在分诊室安排了一名医疗服务提供者,并利用内部候诊室对急诊严重程度指数 3 级和 4 级的患者进行评估,以加快诊断检测和手术的实施。这种模式可以将急诊严重程度较低的病人与急诊严重程度较高的病人分开,后者在主急诊室接受治疗。此外,还将到达提供者、到达病床和出院病人从到达到离开的生命周期中位数与目前的科室流程进行了比较:结果:与目前的收治模式相比,采用医护人员分诊和分流模式后,出院病人的生命周期、到达分诊室的时间、到达病床的时间以及到达医护人员的时间均有明显改善:结论:实施医护人员分流和分流模式可以缩短出院患者的生命周期和其他急诊室指标,提高社区医院的患者护理效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Community Hospital Initiative.

Objective: This quality improvement initiative was conducted to determine if a provider in triage and split flow model could decrease the length of stay (LOS) of discharged patients seen in a community hospital emergency department (ED).

Background: Extended LOSs within the ED lead to delays in the care of patients, increase the number of patients who leave without being seen by a provider, decrease patient satisfaction, and cause a loss of revenue for health care organizations. Using a provider in triage and a split flow model, where patients can be seen and dispositioned without delays, can improve ED throughput and decrease the overall LOS.

Methods: Through a structured, interdisciplinary approach using the Plan-Do-Study-Act Shewhart Cycle of Process Improvement, a provider was placed in triage, and an interior waiting room was used to evaluate emergency severity index level 3 and 4 patients to expedite diagnostic testing and perform procedures. This model allowed lower acuity patients to be cared for separately from higher acuity patients, who were being treated in the main ED. In addition, the median arrival to provider, arrival to bed, and LOS from arrival to departure of discharged patients were compared to the current departmental processes.

Results: There was a significant improvement in the LOS of discharged patients and the time of arrival to triage, arrival to bed, and arrival to provider using a provider in triage and a split flow model compared to the current intake.

Conclusion: Implementation of a provider in triage and a split flow model can demonstrate a decrease in the LOS of discharged patients along with other ED metrics and improve efficiencies in patient care within a community hospital.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal is a peer-reviewed journal designed to meet the needs of advanced practice clinicians, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, healthcare professionals, and clinical and academic educators in emergency nursing. Articles contain evidence-based material that can be applied to daily practice. Continuing Education opportunities are available in each issue. Feature articles focus on in-depth, state of the science content relevant to advanced practice nurses and experienced clinicians in emergency care. Ongoing Departments Include: Cases of Note Radiology Rounds Research to Practice Applied Pharmacology
期刊最新文献
Breaking Barriers and Navigating the Future of Emergency Care: The Role of the Emergency Nurse Practitioner. Executive Leadership and Entrepreneurship of Emergency Nurse Practitioners: Pioneering Pathways in Emergency Care. Founding a Professional Organization: An Interview with American Academy of Emergency Nurse Practitioners' Founder, Dr. Elda Ramirez. Historical Evolution of Emergency Nurse Practitioner Education: A Comprehensive Review. The Evolution of the Emergency Nurse Practitioner Role: A Historical Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1