关节镜下 Bankart 修复术失败后接受拉塔切特翻修术的患者临床疗效好、复发率低。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.054
Emilio Calvo, Cristina Delgado, Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, L Dzidzishvili
{"title":"关节镜下 Bankart 修复术失败后接受拉塔切特翻修术的患者临床疗效好、复发率低。","authors":"Emilio Calvo, Cristina Delgado, Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, L Dzidzishvili","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be definitively established and merits further investigation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision procedure for failed Bankart repair, as well as the return to athletic activity and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2009 and 2020, patients with a previous failed arthroscopic Bankart repair who were treated with an arthroscopic Latarjet were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively included Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome score (CS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Dislocations, subluxations, complications, pre and postoperative level of activity and degree of osteoarthritis were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 patients, mean age at revision surgery 31.2 ± 9.1 and with either one (n = 59), two (n = 13), or three (n = 4) arthroscopic previous stabilizations underwent revision surgery using arthroscopic Latarjet procedure were studied. Postoperatively, the mean ROWE and CS scores increased from 41.8 ± 16 to 90.7 ± 14.3 (p<0.001) and from 50.5 ± 13.8 to 90.5 ± 10.3 (p<0.001), respectively. WOSI decreased from 1247 ± 367.6 to 548.9 ± 363 at the final follow-up (p<0.001). After a mean follow-up of 39.6 ± 23.1 months, 64 shoulders (83.1%) were subjectively graded as good to excellent using SANE score. Grade 1, 2, and 3 osteoarthritis, according to Ogawa et al were found in 18 (23.4%), 6 (7.8%), and 3 (3.9%) shoulders, respectively. Six dislocations after revision surgery were reported (7.8%). In four failed cases an Eden-Hybinette procedure was conducted and in remaining two patients an arthroscopic extraarticular anterior capsular reinforcement was performed. Significantly decreased level of athletic activity was observed postoperatively (p= 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopic Latarjet for revision of failed arthroscopic Bankart repair provides satisfactory patient-reported subjective outcomes with low rate of recurrences and complications. However, decreased level of athletic activity is expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Good Clinical Outcomes and Low Recurrence Rate in Patients undergoing Arthroscopic Revision Latarjet for Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Emilio Calvo, Cristina Delgado, Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, L Dzidzishvili\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be definitively established and merits further investigation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision procedure for failed Bankart repair, as well as the return to athletic activity and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2009 and 2020, patients with a previous failed arthroscopic Bankart repair who were treated with an arthroscopic Latarjet were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively included Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome score (CS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Dislocations, subluxations, complications, pre and postoperative level of activity and degree of osteoarthritis were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 patients, mean age at revision surgery 31.2 ± 9.1 and with either one (n = 59), two (n = 13), or three (n = 4) arthroscopic previous stabilizations underwent revision surgery using arthroscopic Latarjet procedure were studied. Postoperatively, the mean ROWE and CS scores increased from 41.8 ± 16 to 90.7 ± 14.3 (p<0.001) and from 50.5 ± 13.8 to 90.5 ± 10.3 (p<0.001), respectively. WOSI decreased from 1247 ± 367.6 to 548.9 ± 363 at the final follow-up (p<0.001). After a mean follow-up of 39.6 ± 23.1 months, 64 shoulders (83.1%) were subjectively graded as good to excellent using SANE score. Grade 1, 2, and 3 osteoarthritis, according to Ogawa et al were found in 18 (23.4%), 6 (7.8%), and 3 (3.9%) shoulders, respectively. Six dislocations after revision surgery were reported (7.8%). In four failed cases an Eden-Hybinette procedure was conducted and in remaining two patients an arthroscopic extraarticular anterior capsular reinforcement was performed. Significantly decreased level of athletic activity was observed postoperatively (p= 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopic Latarjet for revision of failed arthroscopic Bankart repair provides satisfactory patient-reported subjective outcomes with low rate of recurrences and complications. However, decreased level of athletic activity is expected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关节镜下Bankart修复术失败后,关节镜下Latarjet稳定术的作用尚未明确确定,值得进一步研究:评估作为 Bankart 修复术失败后翻修手术的关节镜下 Latarjet 稳定术后的临床和放射学结果,以及恢复运动和并发症发生率:方法: 在2009年至2020年期间,对既往接受过关节镜下Bankart修复失败并接受过关节镜下Latarjet治疗的患者进行了回顾性评估。术后至少24个月的临床结果包括Rowe评分、西安大略省肩关节不稳定性指数(WOSI)、Constant-Murley肩关节结果评分(CS)和单一评估数值评价(SANE)。此外,还对脱位、半脱位、并发症、术前术后活动水平和骨关节炎程度进行了评估:研究共涉及 77 名患者,翻修手术时的平均年龄为 31.2±9.1 岁,之前接受过一次(59 人)、两次(13 人)或三次(4 人)关节镜稳定手术,采用关节镜 Latarjet 手术进行了翻修手术。术后,平均 ROWE 和 CS 评分从 41.8±16 分上升至 90.7±14.3 分(P结论:关节镜下Latarjet手术用于修复失败的关节镜Bankart修复术,患者报告的主观疗效令人满意,复发率和并发症发生率较低。不过,预计运动量会有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Good Clinical Outcomes and Low Recurrence Rate in Patients undergoing Arthroscopic Revision Latarjet for Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

Background: The role of arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be definitively established and merits further investigation.

Objective: To assess clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision procedure for failed Bankart repair, as well as the return to athletic activity and complication rates.

Methods: Between 2009 and 2020, patients with a previous failed arthroscopic Bankart repair who were treated with an arthroscopic Latarjet were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively included Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome score (CS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Dislocations, subluxations, complications, pre and postoperative level of activity and degree of osteoarthritis were also assessed.

Results: A total of 77 patients, mean age at revision surgery 31.2 ± 9.1 and with either one (n = 59), two (n = 13), or three (n = 4) arthroscopic previous stabilizations underwent revision surgery using arthroscopic Latarjet procedure were studied. Postoperatively, the mean ROWE and CS scores increased from 41.8 ± 16 to 90.7 ± 14.3 (p<0.001) and from 50.5 ± 13.8 to 90.5 ± 10.3 (p<0.001), respectively. WOSI decreased from 1247 ± 367.6 to 548.9 ± 363 at the final follow-up (p<0.001). After a mean follow-up of 39.6 ± 23.1 months, 64 shoulders (83.1%) were subjectively graded as good to excellent using SANE score. Grade 1, 2, and 3 osteoarthritis, according to Ogawa et al were found in 18 (23.4%), 6 (7.8%), and 3 (3.9%) shoulders, respectively. Six dislocations after revision surgery were reported (7.8%). In four failed cases an Eden-Hybinette procedure was conducted and in remaining two patients an arthroscopic extraarticular anterior capsular reinforcement was performed. Significantly decreased level of athletic activity was observed postoperatively (p= 0.01).

Conclusions: Arthroscopic Latarjet for revision of failed arthroscopic Bankart repair provides satisfactory patient-reported subjective outcomes with low rate of recurrences and complications. However, decreased level of athletic activity is expected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Pseudoparalysis Sponsoring Societies Comparing Postoperative Proprioception of the Glenohumeral Joint Between the Open and the Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1