无弱视的斜视患者与对照组的双眼阅读速度比较。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.06.017
Daniel Lamoureux, Sarah Yeo, Vishaal Bhambhwani
{"title":"无弱视的斜视患者与对照组的双眼阅读速度比较。","authors":"Daniel Lamoureux, Sarah Yeo, Vishaal Bhambhwani","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amblyopia has been shown to slow reading speed. Limited literature exists on reading speed in strabismus without amblyopia. Our study compares binocular reading speed in patients with strabismus without amblyopia versus normal controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective study with 48 participants: 12 childhood-onset (onset <8 years of age) strabismus without amblyopia and 36 age- and education level-matched controls. Inclusion criteria were age 14-50 years, education >9 years, primary language English, best-corrected visual acuity >20/30 distance, and >N8 near either eye. Exclusion criteria were presence of other eye pathology or neurologic/cognitive conditions that may affect reading and previous treatment for strabismus/amblyopia. International Reading Speed Texts were used for binocular reading speed assessment. Each participant read 2 passages (passage 1 and 8), following all International Reading Speed Texts instructions. Reading time was measured using a stopwatch. Reading speed was calculated in words per minute (WPM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age for the strabismus group was 28.3 ± 11.1 and for the control group was 28.2 ± 11.0 years (P = 0.96). Mean education level for strabismus group was 14.2 ± 2.4 and control group was 13.8 ± 2.5 years (P = 0.62). Mean binocular reading speed for passage 1 for strabismus group was 192.0 and for control group was 220.0 WPM (P = 0.01). Mean binocular reading speed for passage 8 for strabismus group was 201.3 and for control group was 226.2 WPM (P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with strabismus (without amblyopia) had slower binocular reading speed compared with controls. Further studies with eye tracking may provide more information. Strabismus, even without amblyopia, may affect reading performance and consequently vision-related quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of binocular reading speed in patients with strabismus without amblyopia versus controls.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Lamoureux, Sarah Yeo, Vishaal Bhambhwani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.06.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amblyopia has been shown to slow reading speed. Limited literature exists on reading speed in strabismus without amblyopia. Our study compares binocular reading speed in patients with strabismus without amblyopia versus normal controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective study with 48 participants: 12 childhood-onset (onset <8 years of age) strabismus without amblyopia and 36 age- and education level-matched controls. Inclusion criteria were age 14-50 years, education >9 years, primary language English, best-corrected visual acuity >20/30 distance, and >N8 near either eye. Exclusion criteria were presence of other eye pathology or neurologic/cognitive conditions that may affect reading and previous treatment for strabismus/amblyopia. International Reading Speed Texts were used for binocular reading speed assessment. Each participant read 2 passages (passage 1 and 8), following all International Reading Speed Texts instructions. Reading time was measured using a stopwatch. Reading speed was calculated in words per minute (WPM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age for the strabismus group was 28.3 ± 11.1 and for the control group was 28.2 ± 11.0 years (P = 0.96). Mean education level for strabismus group was 14.2 ± 2.4 and control group was 13.8 ± 2.5 years (P = 0.62). Mean binocular reading speed for passage 1 for strabismus group was 192.0 and for control group was 220.0 WPM (P = 0.01). Mean binocular reading speed for passage 8 for strabismus group was 201.3 and for control group was 226.2 WPM (P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with strabismus (without amblyopia) had slower binocular reading speed compared with controls. Further studies with eye tracking may provide more information. Strabismus, even without amblyopia, may affect reading performance and consequently vision-related quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.06.017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.06.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:弱视已被证明会降低阅读速度。有关无弱视斜视患者阅读速度的文献有限。我们的研究比较了无弱视斜视患者与正常对照组患者的双眼阅读速度:我们对 48 名参与者进行了前瞻性研究:12名儿童期患者(发病年龄为9岁,主要语言为英语,最佳矫正视力>20/30,近距离视力>N8。排除标准为存在可能影响阅读的其他眼部病变或神经/认知疾病,以及曾接受过斜视/弱视治疗。双目阅读速度评估采用国际阅读速度文本。每位受试者阅读 2 个段落(段落 1 和段落 8),并按照国际阅读速度文本的所有说明进行阅读。阅读时间用秒表测量。阅读速度以每分钟字数(WPM)计算:斜视组的平均年龄为(28.3 ± 11.1)岁,对照组的平均年龄为(28.2 ± 11.0)岁(P = 0.96)。斜视组的平均受教育程度为(14.2 ± 2.4)年,对照组为(13.8 ± 2.5)年(P = 0.62)。斜视组第一段的平均双眼阅读速度为 192.0 WPM,对照组为 220.0 WPM(P = 0.01)。斜视组阅读第 8 段的平均双眼阅读速度为 201.3,对照组为 226.2 WPM(P = 0.04):斜视患者(无弱视)的双眼阅读速度低于对照组患者。使用眼动仪进行的进一步研究可能会提供更多信息。斜视,即使没有弱视,也可能影响阅读能力,进而影响与视力相关的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of binocular reading speed in patients with strabismus without amblyopia versus controls.

Objective: Amblyopia has been shown to slow reading speed. Limited literature exists on reading speed in strabismus without amblyopia. Our study compares binocular reading speed in patients with strabismus without amblyopia versus normal controls.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study with 48 participants: 12 childhood-onset (onset <8 years of age) strabismus without amblyopia and 36 age- and education level-matched controls. Inclusion criteria were age 14-50 years, education >9 years, primary language English, best-corrected visual acuity >20/30 distance, and >N8 near either eye. Exclusion criteria were presence of other eye pathology or neurologic/cognitive conditions that may affect reading and previous treatment for strabismus/amblyopia. International Reading Speed Texts were used for binocular reading speed assessment. Each participant read 2 passages (passage 1 and 8), following all International Reading Speed Texts instructions. Reading time was measured using a stopwatch. Reading speed was calculated in words per minute (WPM).

Results: Mean age for the strabismus group was 28.3 ± 11.1 and for the control group was 28.2 ± 11.0 years (P = 0.96). Mean education level for strabismus group was 14.2 ± 2.4 and control group was 13.8 ± 2.5 years (P = 0.62). Mean binocular reading speed for passage 1 for strabismus group was 192.0 and for control group was 220.0 WPM (P = 0.01). Mean binocular reading speed for passage 8 for strabismus group was 201.3 and for control group was 226.2 WPM (P = 0.04).

Conclusions: Patients with strabismus (without amblyopia) had slower binocular reading speed compared with controls. Further studies with eye tracking may provide more information. Strabismus, even without amblyopia, may affect reading performance and consequently vision-related quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1