估算常用草药黑升麻、紫锥菊、接骨木莓、银杏和姜黄的掺假程度--其挑战和局限性。

IF 12.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Central Science Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1039/d4np00014e
Nilüfer Orhan , Stefan Gafner , Mark Blumenthal
{"title":"估算常用草药黑升麻、紫锥菊、接骨木莓、银杏和姜黄的掺假程度--其挑战和局限性。","authors":"Nilüfer Orhan ,&nbsp;Stefan Gafner ,&nbsp;Mark Blumenthal","doi":"10.1039/d4np00014e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Covering: up to July 2023</div></div><div><div>Botanical natural medicinal products and dietary supplements are utilized globally for their positive impacts on health and wellness. However, the effectiveness and safety of botanical products can be compromised by unintentional or intentional adulteration. The presence of adulterated botanical ingredients in the global market has been documented in the published literature but a key question, namely what the extent of adulteration is, remains to be answered. This review aims to estimate the prevalence of adulteration in preparations made from black cohosh rhizome, echinacea root or herb, elder berry, ginkgo leaf, and turmeric root/rhizome. According to the information provided in the 78 publications retrieved for this paper, 818 of 2995 samples were reported to be adulterated and/or mislabeled. Ginkgo leaf samples (<em>n</em> = 533) had the highest adulteration rate with 56.7%, followed by black cohosh rhizome (<em>n</em> = 322) samples with 42.2%, echinacea root/herb (<em>n</em> = 200) with 28.5%, elder berry (<em>n</em> = 695) with 17.1%, and turmeric root/rhizome (<em>n</em> = 1247) with 16.5%. Products sold as licensed or registered herbal medicines were found to have a lower risk of adulteration compared to products sold as dietary/food supplements. The data show that the adulteration rate substantially differs from one ingredient to the other. Due to the significant limitations of the available data upon which the estimated extent of adulteration is based, and the rapidly changing botanical dietary supplement market, conclusions from the five herbs examined in this publication cannot be applied to other botanicals traded in the global market. However, the data clearly show that a substantial portion of the botanical dietary supplements do not contain what is claimed on their labels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10,"journal":{"name":"ACS Central Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/np/d4np00014e?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the extent of adulteration of the popular herbs black cohosh, echinacea, elder berry, ginkgo, and turmeric – its challenges and limitations\",\"authors\":\"Nilüfer Orhan ,&nbsp;Stefan Gafner ,&nbsp;Mark Blumenthal\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d4np00014e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Covering: up to July 2023</div></div><div><div>Botanical natural medicinal products and dietary supplements are utilized globally for their positive impacts on health and wellness. However, the effectiveness and safety of botanical products can be compromised by unintentional or intentional adulteration. The presence of adulterated botanical ingredients in the global market has been documented in the published literature but a key question, namely what the extent of adulteration is, remains to be answered. This review aims to estimate the prevalence of adulteration in preparations made from black cohosh rhizome, echinacea root or herb, elder berry, ginkgo leaf, and turmeric root/rhizome. According to the information provided in the 78 publications retrieved for this paper, 818 of 2995 samples were reported to be adulterated and/or mislabeled. Ginkgo leaf samples (<em>n</em> = 533) had the highest adulteration rate with 56.7%, followed by black cohosh rhizome (<em>n</em> = 322) samples with 42.2%, echinacea root/herb (<em>n</em> = 200) with 28.5%, elder berry (<em>n</em> = 695) with 17.1%, and turmeric root/rhizome (<em>n</em> = 1247) with 16.5%. Products sold as licensed or registered herbal medicines were found to have a lower risk of adulteration compared to products sold as dietary/food supplements. The data show that the adulteration rate substantially differs from one ingredient to the other. Due to the significant limitations of the available data upon which the estimated extent of adulteration is based, and the rapidly changing botanical dietary supplement market, conclusions from the five herbs examined in this publication cannot be applied to other botanicals traded in the global market. However, the data clearly show that a substantial portion of the botanical dietary supplements do not contain what is claimed on their labels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Central Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/np/d4np00014e?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Central Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0265056824000618\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Central Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0265056824000618","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

覆盖范围:截至 2023 年 7 月植物天然药用产品和膳食补充剂因其对健康和保健的积极影响而在全球范围内得到广泛应用。然而,无意或有意的掺假行为可能会损害植物药产品的有效性和安全性。全球市场上存在掺假植物成分的情况在已发表的文献中已有记载,但一个关键问题,即掺假的程度如何,仍有待回答。本综述旨在估算黑升麻根茎、紫锥菊根或草本、接骨木果实、银杏叶和姜黄根/根茎制剂的掺假率。根据本文检索到的 78 篇出版物中提供的信息,2995 个样品中有 818 个被报告掺假和/或贴错标签。银杏叶样本(n = 533)的掺假率最高,为 56.7%;其次是黑升麻根茎样本(n = 322),为 42.2%;紫锥菊根茎样本(n = 200),为 28.5%;接骨木果实样本(n = 695),为 17.1%;姜黄根茎样本(n = 1247),为 16.5%。与作为食物/食品补充剂出售的产品相比,作为持证或注册草药出售的产品掺假风险较低。数据显示,不同成分的掺假率差别很大。由于估计掺假程度所依据的现有数据存在很大局限性,而且植物膳食补充剂市场变化迅速,因此本出版物中研究的五种草药得出的结论不能适用于全球市场上交易的其他植物药。不过,数据清楚地表明,相当一部分植物膳食补充剂并不含有标签上声称的成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating the extent of adulteration of the popular herbs black cohosh, echinacea, elder berry, ginkgo, and turmeric – its challenges and limitations
Covering: up to July 2023
Botanical natural medicinal products and dietary supplements are utilized globally for their positive impacts on health and wellness. However, the effectiveness and safety of botanical products can be compromised by unintentional or intentional adulteration. The presence of adulterated botanical ingredients in the global market has been documented in the published literature but a key question, namely what the extent of adulteration is, remains to be answered. This review aims to estimate the prevalence of adulteration in preparations made from black cohosh rhizome, echinacea root or herb, elder berry, ginkgo leaf, and turmeric root/rhizome. According to the information provided in the 78 publications retrieved for this paper, 818 of 2995 samples were reported to be adulterated and/or mislabeled. Ginkgo leaf samples (n = 533) had the highest adulteration rate with 56.7%, followed by black cohosh rhizome (n = 322) samples with 42.2%, echinacea root/herb (n = 200) with 28.5%, elder berry (n = 695) with 17.1%, and turmeric root/rhizome (n = 1247) with 16.5%. Products sold as licensed or registered herbal medicines were found to have a lower risk of adulteration compared to products sold as dietary/food supplements. The data show that the adulteration rate substantially differs from one ingredient to the other. Due to the significant limitations of the available data upon which the estimated extent of adulteration is based, and the rapidly changing botanical dietary supplement market, conclusions from the five herbs examined in this publication cannot be applied to other botanicals traded in the global market. However, the data clearly show that a substantial portion of the botanical dietary supplements do not contain what is claimed on their labels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Central Science
ACS Central Science Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
25.50
自引率
0.50%
发文量
194
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ACS Central Science publishes significant primary reports on research in chemistry and allied fields where chemical approaches are pivotal. As the first fully open-access journal by the American Chemical Society, it covers compelling and important contributions to the broad chemistry and scientific community. "Central science," a term popularized nearly 40 years ago, emphasizes chemistry's central role in connecting physical and life sciences, and fundamental sciences with applied disciplines like medicine and engineering. The journal focuses on exceptional quality articles, addressing advances in fundamental chemistry and interdisciplinary research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Probiotic bacterial adsorption coupled with CRISPR/Cas12a system for mercury (II) ions detection" [Biosens. Bioelectron. 263 (2024) 116627]. Retraction notice to "A comprehensive study on transparent conducting oxides in compact microbial fuel cells: Integrated spectroscopic and electrochemical analyses for monitoring biofilm growth" [Biosens. Bioelectron. 250 (2024) 116067]. The value of electrochemical ratiometry in immunosensing: A systematic study. Conductive single enzyme nanocomposites prepared by in-situ growth of nanoscale polyaniline for high performance enzymatic bioelectrode. A skin-mountable flexible biosensor based on Cu-MOF/PEDOT composites for sweat ascorbic acid monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1