志愿者和代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病患者剪切波粘弹性成像检查间的再现性

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1002/jum.16538
Ladan Yazdani PhD, Sathiyamoorthy Selladurai PhD, Iman Rafati MSc, Manish Bhatt PhD, Emmanuel Montagnon PhD, Boris Chayer MSc, Damien Olivié MD, Jeanne-Marie Giard MD, MPH, Giada Sebastiani MD, Bich N. Nguyen MD, Guy Cloutier PhD, Eng, An Tang MD, MSc
{"title":"志愿者和代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病患者剪切波粘弹性成像检查间的再现性","authors":"Ladan Yazdani PhD,&nbsp;Sathiyamoorthy Selladurai PhD,&nbsp;Iman Rafati MSc,&nbsp;Manish Bhatt PhD,&nbsp;Emmanuel Montagnon PhD,&nbsp;Boris Chayer MSc,&nbsp;Damien Olivié MD,&nbsp;Jeanne-Marie Giard MD, MPH,&nbsp;Giada Sebastiani MD,&nbsp;Bich N. Nguyen MD,&nbsp;Guy Cloutier PhD, Eng,&nbsp;An Tang MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jum.16538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the reproducibility of six ultrasound (US)-determined shear wave (SW) viscoelastography parameters for assessment of mechanical properties of the liver in volunteers and patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective, cross-sectional, institutional review board-approved study included 10 volunteers and 20 patients with MASLD or MASH who underwent liver US elastography twice, at least 2 weeks apart. SW speed (SWS), Young's modulus (<i>E</i>), shear modulus (<i>G</i>), SW attenuation (SWA), SW dispersion (SWD), and viscosity were computed from radiofrequency data recorded on a research US scanner. Linear mixed models were used to consider the sonographer on duty as a confounder. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), reproducibility coefficient (RDC), and Bland-Altman analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The sonographer performing the exam had no impact on viscoelastic parameters (<i>P</i> &gt; .05). ICCs of SWS, <i>E</i>, <i>G</i>, SWA, SWD, and viscosity were, respectively, 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.79-0.95), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95); CVs were 11.9, 23.3, 24.2, 10.1, 29.0, and 32.2%; RDCs were 33.0, 64.5, 66.9, 27.7, 80.3, and 89.2%, and Bland-Altman mean biases and 95% limits of agreement were −0.05 (−0.45, 0.35) m/s, −0.61 (−5.33, 4.10) kPa, −0.25 (−2.06, 1.56) kPa, −0.01 (−0.27, 0.26) Np/m/Hz, −0.09 (−7.09, 6.91) m/s/kHz, and −0.33 (−2.60, 1.94) Pa/s, between the two visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>US-determined viscoelastography parameters can be measured with high reproducibility and consistency between two visits 2 weeks apart on the same ultrasound machine.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"43 11","pages":"2095-2108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jum.16538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between-Visit Reproducibility of Shear Wave Viscoelastography in Volunteers and Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease\",\"authors\":\"Ladan Yazdani PhD,&nbsp;Sathiyamoorthy Selladurai PhD,&nbsp;Iman Rafati MSc,&nbsp;Manish Bhatt PhD,&nbsp;Emmanuel Montagnon PhD,&nbsp;Boris Chayer MSc,&nbsp;Damien Olivié MD,&nbsp;Jeanne-Marie Giard MD, MPH,&nbsp;Giada Sebastiani MD,&nbsp;Bich N. Nguyen MD,&nbsp;Guy Cloutier PhD, Eng,&nbsp;An Tang MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.16538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the reproducibility of six ultrasound (US)-determined shear wave (SW) viscoelastography parameters for assessment of mechanical properties of the liver in volunteers and patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This prospective, cross-sectional, institutional review board-approved study included 10 volunteers and 20 patients with MASLD or MASH who underwent liver US elastography twice, at least 2 weeks apart. SW speed (SWS), Young's modulus (<i>E</i>), shear modulus (<i>G</i>), SW attenuation (SWA), SW dispersion (SWD), and viscosity were computed from radiofrequency data recorded on a research US scanner. Linear mixed models were used to consider the sonographer on duty as a confounder. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), reproducibility coefficient (RDC), and Bland-Altman analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The sonographer performing the exam had no impact on viscoelastic parameters (<i>P</i> &gt; .05). ICCs of SWS, <i>E</i>, <i>G</i>, SWA, SWD, and viscosity were, respectively, 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.79-0.95), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95); CVs were 11.9, 23.3, 24.2, 10.1, 29.0, and 32.2%; RDCs were 33.0, 64.5, 66.9, 27.7, 80.3, and 89.2%, and Bland-Altman mean biases and 95% limits of agreement were −0.05 (−0.45, 0.35) m/s, −0.61 (−5.33, 4.10) kPa, −0.25 (−2.06, 1.56) kPa, −0.01 (−0.27, 0.26) Np/m/Hz, −0.09 (−7.09, 6.91) m/s/kHz, and −0.33 (−2.60, 1.94) Pa/s, between the two visits.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>US-determined viscoelastography parameters can be measured with high reproducibility and consistency between two visits 2 weeks apart on the same ultrasound machine.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 11\",\"pages\":\"2095-2108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jum.16538\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16538\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估志愿者和活检证实的代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)或代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝炎(MASH)患者在评估肝脏机械特性时使用的六种超声(US)测定的剪切波(SW)粘弹性参数的重现性:这项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性横断面研究纳入了 10 名志愿者和 20 名 MASLD 或 MASH 患者,他们接受了两次肝脏 US 弹性成像检查,每次间隔至少 2 周。根据研究用 US 扫描仪记录的射频数据计算 SW 速度 (SWS)、杨氏模量 (E)、剪切模量 (G)、SW 衰减 (SWA)、SW 弥散 (SWD) 和粘度。采用线性混合模型,将超声技师的值班情况作为混杂因素考虑。测量的再现性通过类内相关系数(ICC)、变异系数(CV)、再现性系数(RDC)和布兰-阿尔特曼分析进行评估:结果:进行检查的超声技师对粘弹性参数没有影响(P > .05)。SWS、E、G、SWA、SWD 和粘度的 ICC 分别为 0.89(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.79-0.95)、0.81(95% CI:0.79-0.95)、0.90(95% CI:0.80-0.95)、0.96(95% CI:0.93-0.98)、0.78(95% CI:0.60-0.89)和 0.90(95% CI:0.80-0.95);CV 分别为 11.9%、23.3%、24.2%、10.1%、29.0% 和 32.2%;RDC 分别为 33.0、64.5、66.9、27.7、80.3 和 89.2%;布兰-阿尔特曼平均偏差和 95% 的一致限分别为 -0.05 (-0.45, 0.35) m/s、-0.61 (-5.33, 4.10) kPa、-0.25(-2.06,1.56)kPa、-0.01(-0.27,0.26)Np/m/Hz、-0.09(-7.09,6.91)m/s/kHz、-0.33(-2.60,1.94)Pa/s:结论:在同一台超声波机上,相隔 2 周的两次就诊可测量出 US 确定的粘弹性参数,其重复性和一致性很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Between-Visit Reproducibility of Shear Wave Viscoelastography in Volunteers and Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Objective

To assess the reproducibility of six ultrasound (US)-determined shear wave (SW) viscoelastography parameters for assessment of mechanical properties of the liver in volunteers and patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).

Methods

This prospective, cross-sectional, institutional review board-approved study included 10 volunteers and 20 patients with MASLD or MASH who underwent liver US elastography twice, at least 2 weeks apart. SW speed (SWS), Young's modulus (E), shear modulus (G), SW attenuation (SWA), SW dispersion (SWD), and viscosity were computed from radiofrequency data recorded on a research US scanner. Linear mixed models were used to consider the sonographer on duty as a confounder. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), reproducibility coefficient (RDC), and Bland-Altman analyses.

Results

The sonographer performing the exam had no impact on viscoelastic parameters (P > .05). ICCs of SWS, E, G, SWA, SWD, and viscosity were, respectively, 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.79-0.95), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95); CVs were 11.9, 23.3, 24.2, 10.1, 29.0, and 32.2%; RDCs were 33.0, 64.5, 66.9, 27.7, 80.3, and 89.2%, and Bland-Altman mean biases and 95% limits of agreement were −0.05 (−0.45, 0.35) m/s, −0.61 (−5.33, 4.10) kPa, −0.25 (−2.06, 1.56) kPa, −0.01 (−0.27, 0.26) Np/m/Hz, −0.09 (−7.09, 6.91) m/s/kHz, and −0.33 (−2.60, 1.94) Pa/s, between the two visits.

Conclusion

US-determined viscoelastography parameters can be measured with high reproducibility and consistency between two visits 2 weeks apart on the same ultrasound machine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Hidradenitis Suppurativa Assessment: The Role of Ultra-High Frequency Ultrasound in Detecting Microtunnels and Refining Disease Staging. The Median Nerve Displays Adaptive Characteristics When Exposed to Repeated Pinch Grip Efforts of Varying Rates of Force Development: An Ultrasonic Investigation. Ultrasound Pattern of Congenital Smooth Muscle Hamartoma of the Skin. Ultrasonographic Features of the Fallopian Tubes: An Overview on Main Tubal Pathologies. Clinical and Multimodal Imaging Features of Hepatic Inflammatory Pseudotumors: A Two-Center Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1