栖息地和果实气味对短尾果蝠与瓜蒌植物相互作用的影响

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Integrative Organismal Biology Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/iob/obae028
S Sil, F Visconti, G Chaverri, S E Santana
{"title":"栖息地和果实气味对短尾果蝠与瓜蒌植物相互作用的影响","authors":"S Sil, F Visconti, G Chaverri, S E Santana","doi":"10.1093/iob/obae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Piper</i> is a mega-diverse genus of pioneer plants that contributes to the maintenance and regeneration of tropical forests. In the Neotropics, <i>Carollia</i> bats use olfaction to forage for <i>Piper</i> fruit and are a main disperser of <i>Piper</i> seeds via consumption and subsequent defecation during flight. In return, <i>Piper</i> fruits provide essential nutrients for <i>Carollia</i> year-round. There is evidence that the types and diversity of <i>Piper</i> frugivores are influenced by the primary habitat type of different <i>Piper</i> species (forest and gap), with forest <i>Piper</i> depending more on bats for seed dispersal; however, this pattern has not been tested broadly. We aimed to characterize and compare the interactions between <i>Carollia</i> and <i>Piper</i> across forested and gap habitats, and further investigate whether differences in fruit traits relevant to bat foraging (i.e., scent) could underlie differences in <i>Carollia-Piper</i> interactions. We collected nightly acoustic ultrasonic recordings and 24 h camera trap data in La Selva, Costa Rica across 12 species of <i>Piper</i> (six forest, six gap) and integrated this information with data on <i>Carollia</i> diet and <i>Piper</i> fruit scent. Merging biomonitoring modalities allowed us to characterize ecological interactions in a hierarchical manner: from general activity and presence of bats, to visitations and inspections of plants, to acquisition and consumption of fruits. We found significant differences in <i>Carollia-Piper</i> interactions between forested and gap habitats; however, the type of biomonitoring modality (camera trap, acoustics, diet) influenced our ability to detect these differences. Forest <i>Piper</i> were exclusively visited by bats, whereas gap <i>Piper</i> had a more diverse suite of frugivores; the annual diet of <i>Carollia</i>, however, is dominated by gap <i>Piper</i> since these plants produce fruit year-round. We found evidence that fruit scent composition significantly differs between forest and gap <i>Piper</i>, which highlights the possibility that bats could be using chemical cues to differentially forage for gap vs. forest <i>Piper</i>. By integrating studies of <i>Piper</i> fruit scent, plant visitation patterns, and <i>Carollia</i> diet composition, we paint a clearer picture of the ecological interactions between <i>Piper</i> and <i>Carollia</i>, and plant-animal mutualisms more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":13666,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Organismal Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Habitat and Fruit Scent on the Interactions between Short-tailed Fruit Bats and <i>Piper</i> Plants.\",\"authors\":\"S Sil, F Visconti, G Chaverri, S E Santana\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/iob/obae028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Piper</i> is a mega-diverse genus of pioneer plants that contributes to the maintenance and regeneration of tropical forests. In the Neotropics, <i>Carollia</i> bats use olfaction to forage for <i>Piper</i> fruit and are a main disperser of <i>Piper</i> seeds via consumption and subsequent defecation during flight. In return, <i>Piper</i> fruits provide essential nutrients for <i>Carollia</i> year-round. There is evidence that the types and diversity of <i>Piper</i> frugivores are influenced by the primary habitat type of different <i>Piper</i> species (forest and gap), with forest <i>Piper</i> depending more on bats for seed dispersal; however, this pattern has not been tested broadly. We aimed to characterize and compare the interactions between <i>Carollia</i> and <i>Piper</i> across forested and gap habitats, and further investigate whether differences in fruit traits relevant to bat foraging (i.e., scent) could underlie differences in <i>Carollia-Piper</i> interactions. We collected nightly acoustic ultrasonic recordings and 24 h camera trap data in La Selva, Costa Rica across 12 species of <i>Piper</i> (six forest, six gap) and integrated this information with data on <i>Carollia</i> diet and <i>Piper</i> fruit scent. Merging biomonitoring modalities allowed us to characterize ecological interactions in a hierarchical manner: from general activity and presence of bats, to visitations and inspections of plants, to acquisition and consumption of fruits. We found significant differences in <i>Carollia-Piper</i> interactions between forested and gap habitats; however, the type of biomonitoring modality (camera trap, acoustics, diet) influenced our ability to detect these differences. Forest <i>Piper</i> were exclusively visited by bats, whereas gap <i>Piper</i> had a more diverse suite of frugivores; the annual diet of <i>Carollia</i>, however, is dominated by gap <i>Piper</i> since these plants produce fruit year-round. We found evidence that fruit scent composition significantly differs between forest and gap <i>Piper</i>, which highlights the possibility that bats could be using chemical cues to differentially forage for gap vs. forest <i>Piper</i>. By integrating studies of <i>Piper</i> fruit scent, plant visitation patterns, and <i>Carollia</i> diet composition, we paint a clearer picture of the ecological interactions between <i>Piper</i> and <i>Carollia</i>, and plant-animal mutualisms more generally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Organismal Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316396/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Organismal Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obae028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Organismal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obae028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胡椒属是一种种类繁多的先锋植物,有助于热带森林的维护和再生。在新热带地区,蝙蝠 Carollia 利用嗅觉觅食瓜蒌果实,是瓜蒌种子的主要传播者,它们在飞行过程中食用瓜蒌种子并随后排便。作为回报,瓜蒌果实为 Carollia 全年提供必要的营养。有证据表明,瓜蒌食草动物的类型和多样性受到不同瓜蒌物种主要栖息地类型(森林和空隙)的影响,森林瓜蒌更依赖蝙蝠传播种子;然而,这种模式尚未得到广泛检验。我们的目的是描述和比较Carollia与瓜蒌在森林栖息地和隙地栖息地之间的相互作用,并进一步研究与蝙蝠觅食相关的果实性状(即气味)的差异是否会导致Carollia与瓜蒌之间相互作用的差异。我们在哥斯达黎加拉塞尔瓦收集了12种胡椒(6种森林胡椒、6种间隙胡椒)的夜间超声波记录和24小时相机陷阱数据,并将这些信息与卡罗利亚食谱和胡椒果实气味数据进行了整合。合并生物监测模式使我们能够以分层的方式描述生态互动的特征:从蝙蝠的一般活动和存在,到植物的访问和检查,再到果实的获取和消费。我们发现在森林栖息地和间隙栖息地之间,Carollia-Piper 与蝙蝠之间的互动存在显著差异;然而,生物监测模式的类型(相机陷阱、声学、饮食)影响了我们发现这些差异的能力。森林瓜蒌只被蝙蝠光顾,而间隙瓜蒌则有更多样化的食草动物;然而,由于间隙瓜蒌一年四季都能结果,因此卡罗利亚的年度食物主要是间隙瓜蒌。我们发现有证据表明,森林瓜蒌和间隙瓜蒌的果实气味成分明显不同,这突出表明蝙蝠有可能利用化学线索对间隙瓜蒌和森林瓜蒌进行不同的觅食。通过综合研究瓜蒌果实气味、植物访问模式和卡罗利亚食谱组成,我们更清楚地描绘了瓜蒌和卡罗利亚之间的生态互动关系,以及更广泛的植物-动物互惠关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Habitat and Fruit Scent on the Interactions between Short-tailed Fruit Bats and Piper Plants.

Piper is a mega-diverse genus of pioneer plants that contributes to the maintenance and regeneration of tropical forests. In the Neotropics, Carollia bats use olfaction to forage for Piper fruit and are a main disperser of Piper seeds via consumption and subsequent defecation during flight. In return, Piper fruits provide essential nutrients for Carollia year-round. There is evidence that the types and diversity of Piper frugivores are influenced by the primary habitat type of different Piper species (forest and gap), with forest Piper depending more on bats for seed dispersal; however, this pattern has not been tested broadly. We aimed to characterize and compare the interactions between Carollia and Piper across forested and gap habitats, and further investigate whether differences in fruit traits relevant to bat foraging (i.e., scent) could underlie differences in Carollia-Piper interactions. We collected nightly acoustic ultrasonic recordings and 24 h camera trap data in La Selva, Costa Rica across 12 species of Piper (six forest, six gap) and integrated this information with data on Carollia diet and Piper fruit scent. Merging biomonitoring modalities allowed us to characterize ecological interactions in a hierarchical manner: from general activity and presence of bats, to visitations and inspections of plants, to acquisition and consumption of fruits. We found significant differences in Carollia-Piper interactions between forested and gap habitats; however, the type of biomonitoring modality (camera trap, acoustics, diet) influenced our ability to detect these differences. Forest Piper were exclusively visited by bats, whereas gap Piper had a more diverse suite of frugivores; the annual diet of Carollia, however, is dominated by gap Piper since these plants produce fruit year-round. We found evidence that fruit scent composition significantly differs between forest and gap Piper, which highlights the possibility that bats could be using chemical cues to differentially forage for gap vs. forest Piper. By integrating studies of Piper fruit scent, plant visitation patterns, and Carollia diet composition, we paint a clearer picture of the ecological interactions between Piper and Carollia, and plant-animal mutualisms more generally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risky Business: Predator Chemical Cues Mediate Morphological Changes in Freshwater Snails. Jumping Performance and Behavior of the Globular Springtail Dicyrtomina minuta. Embodied Computational Evolution: A Model for Investigating Randomness and the Evolution of Morphological Complexity. The Physiological and Biochemical Response of Ribbed Mussels to Rising Temperatures: Benefits of Salt Marsh Cordgrass. Variable Craniofacial Shape and Development among Multiple Cave-Adapted Populations of Astyanax mexicanus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1