利用废水监测估计 SARS-CoV-2 粪便病毒散播模式并确定传播加剧的时间段

Wan Yang, Enoma Omoregie, Aaron Olsen, Elizabeth A. Watts, Hilary Parton, Ellen Lee
{"title":"利用废水监测估计 SARS-CoV-2 粪便病毒散播模式并确定传播加剧的时间段","authors":"Wan Yang, Enoma Omoregie, Aaron Olsen, Elizabeth A. Watts, Hilary Parton, Ellen Lee","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.02.24311410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Wastewater-based surveillance is an important tool for monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it remains challenging to translate wastewater SARS-CoV-2 viral load to infection number, due to unclear shedding patterns in wastewater and potential differences between variants. Objectives: We utilized comprehensive wastewater surveillance data and estimates of infection prevalence (i.e., the source of the viral shedding) available for New York City (NYC) to characterize SARS-CoV-2 fecal shedding pattern over multiple COVID-19 waves. Methods: We collected SARS-CoV-2 viral wastewater measurements in NYC during August 31, 2020 - August 29, 2023 (N = 3794 samples). Combining with estimates of infection prevalence (number of infectious individuals including those not detected as cases), we estimated the time-lag, duration, and per-infection fecal shedding rate for the ancestral/Iota, Delta, and Omicron variants, separately. We also developed a procedure to identify occasions with intensified transmission. Results: Models suggested fecal viral shedding likely starts around the same time as and lasts slightly longer than respiratory tract shedding. Estimated fecal viral shedding rate was highest during the ancestral/Iota variant wave, at 1.44 (95% CI: 1.35 - 1.53) billion RNA copies in wastewater per day per infection (measured by RT-qPCR), and decreased by ~20% and 50-60% during the Delta wave and Omicron period, respectively. We identified around 200 occasions during which the wastewater SARS-CoV-2 viral load exceeded the expected level in any of 14 sewersheds. These anomalies disproportionally occurred during late January, late April - early May, early August, and from late-November to late-December, with frequencies exceeding the expectation assuming random occurrence (P < 0.05; bootstrapping test). Discussion: These estimates may be useful in understanding changes in underlying infection rate and help quantify changes in COVID-19 transmission and severity over time. We have also demonstrated that wastewater surveillance data can support the identification of time periods with potentially intensified transmission.","PeriodicalId":501071,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Wastewater Surveillance to Estimate SARS-CoV-2 Fecal Viral Shedding Pattern and Identify Time Periods with Intensified Transmission\",\"authors\":\"Wan Yang, Enoma Omoregie, Aaron Olsen, Elizabeth A. Watts, Hilary Parton, Ellen Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.02.24311410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Wastewater-based surveillance is an important tool for monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it remains challenging to translate wastewater SARS-CoV-2 viral load to infection number, due to unclear shedding patterns in wastewater and potential differences between variants. Objectives: We utilized comprehensive wastewater surveillance data and estimates of infection prevalence (i.e., the source of the viral shedding) available for New York City (NYC) to characterize SARS-CoV-2 fecal shedding pattern over multiple COVID-19 waves. Methods: We collected SARS-CoV-2 viral wastewater measurements in NYC during August 31, 2020 - August 29, 2023 (N = 3794 samples). Combining with estimates of infection prevalence (number of infectious individuals including those not detected as cases), we estimated the time-lag, duration, and per-infection fecal shedding rate for the ancestral/Iota, Delta, and Omicron variants, separately. We also developed a procedure to identify occasions with intensified transmission. Results: Models suggested fecal viral shedding likely starts around the same time as and lasts slightly longer than respiratory tract shedding. Estimated fecal viral shedding rate was highest during the ancestral/Iota variant wave, at 1.44 (95% CI: 1.35 - 1.53) billion RNA copies in wastewater per day per infection (measured by RT-qPCR), and decreased by ~20% and 50-60% during the Delta wave and Omicron period, respectively. We identified around 200 occasions during which the wastewater SARS-CoV-2 viral load exceeded the expected level in any of 14 sewersheds. These anomalies disproportionally occurred during late January, late April - early May, early August, and from late-November to late-December, with frequencies exceeding the expectation assuming random occurrence (P < 0.05; bootstrapping test). Discussion: These estimates may be useful in understanding changes in underlying infection rate and help quantify changes in COVID-19 transmission and severity over time. We have also demonstrated that wastewater surveillance data can support the identification of time periods with potentially intensified transmission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.02.24311410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.02.24311410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:废水监测是监测 COVID-19 大流行的重要工具。然而,由于废水中的脱落模式不明确以及不同变异株之间的潜在差异,将废水中的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量转化为感染数量仍具有挑战性。目标:我们利用纽约市(NYC)现有的全面废水监测数据和感染率(即病毒脱落源)估算值来描述多个 COVID-19 浪潮中的 SARS-CoV-2 粪便脱落模式。方法我们收集了 2020 年 8 月 31 日至 2023 年 8 月 29 日期间纽约市的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒废水测量值(N = 3794 个样本)。结合对感染率(感染者人数,包括未发现病例的感染者人数)的估计,我们分别估计了祖先/Iota、Delta 和 Omicron 变种的时滞、持续时间和每次感染的粪便脱落率。我们还开发了一种程序来确定传播加剧的场合。结果模型表明,粪便病毒脱落可能与呼吸道病毒脱落同时开始,且持续时间略长于呼吸道病毒脱落。估计的粪便病毒脱落率在祖先/伊奥塔变异潮期间最高,每天每次感染废水中的病毒脱落率为 1.44(95% CI:1.35 - 1.53)亿 RNA 拷贝(通过 RT-qPCR 测定),在德尔塔潮和奥米克隆时期分别下降了约 20% 和 50-60%。我们发现,在 14 个下水道中,约有 200 次废水中的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量超过了预期水平。这些异常情况主要发生在 1 月下旬、4 月下旬至 5 月上旬、8 月上旬以及 11 月下旬至 12 月下旬,其频率超过了假设随机发生的预期水平(P < 0.05; bootstrapping test)。讨论:这些估计值可能有助于了解基本感染率的变化,并有助于量化 COVID-19 传播和严重程度随时间的变化。我们还证明,废水监测数据可帮助确定传播可能加剧的时间段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of Wastewater Surveillance to Estimate SARS-CoV-2 Fecal Viral Shedding Pattern and Identify Time Periods with Intensified Transmission
Background: Wastewater-based surveillance is an important tool for monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it remains challenging to translate wastewater SARS-CoV-2 viral load to infection number, due to unclear shedding patterns in wastewater and potential differences between variants. Objectives: We utilized comprehensive wastewater surveillance data and estimates of infection prevalence (i.e., the source of the viral shedding) available for New York City (NYC) to characterize SARS-CoV-2 fecal shedding pattern over multiple COVID-19 waves. Methods: We collected SARS-CoV-2 viral wastewater measurements in NYC during August 31, 2020 - August 29, 2023 (N = 3794 samples). Combining with estimates of infection prevalence (number of infectious individuals including those not detected as cases), we estimated the time-lag, duration, and per-infection fecal shedding rate for the ancestral/Iota, Delta, and Omicron variants, separately. We also developed a procedure to identify occasions with intensified transmission. Results: Models suggested fecal viral shedding likely starts around the same time as and lasts slightly longer than respiratory tract shedding. Estimated fecal viral shedding rate was highest during the ancestral/Iota variant wave, at 1.44 (95% CI: 1.35 - 1.53) billion RNA copies in wastewater per day per infection (measured by RT-qPCR), and decreased by ~20% and 50-60% during the Delta wave and Omicron period, respectively. We identified around 200 occasions during which the wastewater SARS-CoV-2 viral load exceeded the expected level in any of 14 sewersheds. These anomalies disproportionally occurred during late January, late April - early May, early August, and from late-November to late-December, with frequencies exceeding the expectation assuming random occurrence (P < 0.05; bootstrapping test). Discussion: These estimates may be useful in understanding changes in underlying infection rate and help quantify changes in COVID-19 transmission and severity over time. We have also demonstrated that wastewater surveillance data can support the identification of time periods with potentially intensified transmission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and Malaria: A Call for Robust Analytics Female Infertility and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children: associations and evidence for familial confounding in Denmark Surveillance and control of neglected zoonotic diseases: methodological approaches to studying Rift Valley Fever, Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever and Brucellosis at the human-livestock-wildlife interface across diverse agricultural systems in Uganda Climate variation and serotype competition drive dengue outbreak dynamics in Singapore Leveraging an Online Dashboard to Inform on Infectious Disease Surveillance: A case Study of COVID-19 in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1