使用高应力 REBCO 线圈对应变超过 0.4% 的弹塑性导体损伤进行评估

Jeseok Bang, Griffin Bradford, Kwangmin Kim, Jonathan Lee, Anatolii Polyanskii and David Larbalestier
{"title":"使用高应力 REBCO 线圈对应变超过 0.4% 的弹塑性导体损伤进行评估","authors":"Jeseok Bang, Griffin Bradford, Kwangmin Kim, Jonathan Lee, Anatolii Polyanskii and David Larbalestier","doi":"10.1088/1361-6668/ad6a9d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent reports on screening current stress simulations of high-field REBCO magnets frequently present peak stresses over 1 GPa. However, this result is probably an unrealistic artifact of purely elastic calculations, considering the macroscopic yield and fracture stresses of approximately 900 MPa and less than 1.1 GPa for Hastelloy substrate-coated conductors. Here, we evaluate elastic-plastic conductor damage at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil exposed to a high field to explore this elastic-plastic regime. The coil was located off-center in a low-temperature superconductor magnet so as to induce a significant screening current in the enhanced radial field. Voltage taps, a Hall sensor, and two strain gauges were used for the instrumentation. We obtained strains exceeding 0.4% near the outward edge during the coil current charge from 350 A to 390 A, where the coil was exposed to external axial and radial magnetic fields of 13 T and 0.5 T. Post mortem results showed wavy plastic deformation, electrical damage, and REBCO defects. An elastic-plastic simulation reproduced the measured strains and predicted that ∼1 GPa stress is sufficient to induce ∼0.9% strain, thus validating our initial concerns with purely elastic models. This paper provides our experimental and simulation results.","PeriodicalId":21985,"journal":{"name":"Superconductor Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elastic-plastic conductor damage evaluation at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil\",\"authors\":\"Jeseok Bang, Griffin Bradford, Kwangmin Kim, Jonathan Lee, Anatolii Polyanskii and David Larbalestier\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6668/ad6a9d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent reports on screening current stress simulations of high-field REBCO magnets frequently present peak stresses over 1 GPa. However, this result is probably an unrealistic artifact of purely elastic calculations, considering the macroscopic yield and fracture stresses of approximately 900 MPa and less than 1.1 GPa for Hastelloy substrate-coated conductors. Here, we evaluate elastic-plastic conductor damage at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil exposed to a high field to explore this elastic-plastic regime. The coil was located off-center in a low-temperature superconductor magnet so as to induce a significant screening current in the enhanced radial field. Voltage taps, a Hall sensor, and two strain gauges were used for the instrumentation. We obtained strains exceeding 0.4% near the outward edge during the coil current charge from 350 A to 390 A, where the coil was exposed to external axial and radial magnetic fields of 13 T and 0.5 T. Post mortem results showed wavy plastic deformation, electrical damage, and REBCO defects. An elastic-plastic simulation reproduced the measured strains and predicted that ∼1 GPa stress is sufficient to induce ∼0.9% strain, thus validating our initial concerns with purely elastic models. This paper provides our experimental and simulation results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Superconductor Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Superconductor Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad6a9d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Superconductor Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad6a9d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近关于高磁场 REBCO 磁体屏蔽电流应力模拟的报告经常显示峰值应力超过 1 GPa。然而,考虑到哈氏合金基材涂层导体的宏观屈服应力和断裂应力分别约为 900 兆帕和小于 1.1 GPa,这一结果很可能是纯弹性计算中不切实际的假象。在此,我们使用暴露在高场中的高应力 REBCO 线圈来评估应变超过 0.4% 的弹塑性导体损伤,以探索这种弹塑性机制。线圈位于低温超导体磁体的偏心位置,以便在增强的径向磁场中产生显著的屏蔽电流。仪器使用了电压抽头、霍尔传感器和两个应变计。在线圈电流从 350 A 充至 390 A 期间,我们在外缘附近获得了超过 0.4% 的应变,线圈暴露在 13 T 和 0.5 T 的外部轴向和径向磁场中。弹塑性模拟再现了测量到的应变,并预测 1 GPa 的应力足以引起 0.9% 的应变,从而验证了我们最初对纯弹性模型的担忧。本文提供了我们的实验和模拟结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elastic-plastic conductor damage evaluation at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil
Recent reports on screening current stress simulations of high-field REBCO magnets frequently present peak stresses over 1 GPa. However, this result is probably an unrealistic artifact of purely elastic calculations, considering the macroscopic yield and fracture stresses of approximately 900 MPa and less than 1.1 GPa for Hastelloy substrate-coated conductors. Here, we evaluate elastic-plastic conductor damage at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil exposed to a high field to explore this elastic-plastic regime. The coil was located off-center in a low-temperature superconductor magnet so as to induce a significant screening current in the enhanced radial field. Voltage taps, a Hall sensor, and two strain gauges were used for the instrumentation. We obtained strains exceeding 0.4% near the outward edge during the coil current charge from 350 A to 390 A, where the coil was exposed to external axial and radial magnetic fields of 13 T and 0.5 T. Post mortem results showed wavy plastic deformation, electrical damage, and REBCO defects. An elastic-plastic simulation reproduced the measured strains and predicted that ∼1 GPa stress is sufficient to induce ∼0.9% strain, thus validating our initial concerns with purely elastic models. This paper provides our experimental and simulation results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhanced mechanical strength and texture of (Ba,K)Fe2As2 Cu/Ag composite sheathed tapes with Nb barrier layer Natural width of the superconducting transition in epitaxial TiN films Kagome materials AV3Sb5 (A = K,Rb,Cs): pairing symmetry and pressure-tuning studies Stable implicit numerical algorithm of time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau theory coupled with thermal effect for vortex behaviors in hybrid superconductor systems From weak to strong-coupling superconductivity tuned by substrate in TiN films
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1