天然气开采与社区成果:坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉农村地区的案例

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.exis.2024.101497
Beston Musa Musoma , Suzana Samson Nyanda , Mikidadi Idd Muhanga , Fatihiya Ally Massawe
{"title":"天然气开采与社区成果:坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉农村地区的案例","authors":"Beston Musa Musoma ,&nbsp;Suzana Samson Nyanda ,&nbsp;Mikidadi Idd Muhanga ,&nbsp;Fatihiya Ally Massawe","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the effects of gas extraction operations (GEOs) on livelihood outcomes among rural communities in the Mtwara Rural District of Tanzania. This study employed a cross-sectional research methodology with a proportionately stratified sample of 260 participants. A questionnaire and interview guide were used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data during focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and household surveys. It examines net annual income in Tanzanian shillings (TAS), the monetary value of a household's assets in TAS, and food security using the Household Food Insufficiency Access Scale (HFIAS). The study revealed that nearby households (treated group) had much stronger food security than distant (control) households by 9.528 to 8.189 across near neighbor matching (NNM) and by 9.444 to 7.619 across radius caliper matching, with these differences being statistically significant at <em>t</em> = 2.0 and <em>t</em> = 2.5, respectively. The results suggest that the government should pursue measures that increase rural households' chances for off-farm jobs in order to improve their well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101497"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gas extraction and community outcomes: The case of Mtwara rural district, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Beston Musa Musoma ,&nbsp;Suzana Samson Nyanda ,&nbsp;Mikidadi Idd Muhanga ,&nbsp;Fatihiya Ally Massawe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines the effects of gas extraction operations (GEOs) on livelihood outcomes among rural communities in the Mtwara Rural District of Tanzania. This study employed a cross-sectional research methodology with a proportionately stratified sample of 260 participants. A questionnaire and interview guide were used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data during focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and household surveys. It examines net annual income in Tanzanian shillings (TAS), the monetary value of a household's assets in TAS, and food security using the Household Food Insufficiency Access Scale (HFIAS). The study revealed that nearby households (treated group) had much stronger food security than distant (control) households by 9.528 to 8.189 across near neighbor matching (NNM) and by 9.444 to 7.619 across radius caliper matching, with these differences being statistically significant at <em>t</em> = 2.0 and <em>t</em> = 2.5, respectively. The results suggest that the government should pursue measures that increase rural households' chances for off-farm jobs in order to improve their well-being.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24000959\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24000959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了天然气开采作业(GEOs)对坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉农村地区农村社区生计成果的影响。本研究采用横断面研究方法,按比例分层抽样,共抽取了 260 名参与者。通过焦点小组讨论、关键信息提供者访谈和家庭调查,使用问卷和访谈指南收集定量和定性数据。研究考察了以坦桑尼亚先令(TAS)为单位的年净收入、以坦桑尼亚先令(TAS)为单位的家庭资产货币价值,以及使用家庭食物不足获取量表(HFIAS)进行的食物保障情况。研究显示,在近邻匹配(NNM)和半径卡尺匹配方面,近邻家庭(治疗组)比远邻家庭(对照组)的粮食安全程度要高得多,分别为 9.528 比 8.189,9.444 比 7.619,这些差异在 t = 2.0 和 t = 2.5 时具有显著的统计学意义。结果表明,政府应采取措施增加农村家庭的非农就业机会,以改善他们的福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gas extraction and community outcomes: The case of Mtwara rural district, Tanzania

This study examines the effects of gas extraction operations (GEOs) on livelihood outcomes among rural communities in the Mtwara Rural District of Tanzania. This study employed a cross-sectional research methodology with a proportionately stratified sample of 260 participants. A questionnaire and interview guide were used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data during focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and household surveys. It examines net annual income in Tanzanian shillings (TAS), the monetary value of a household's assets in TAS, and food security using the Household Food Insufficiency Access Scale (HFIAS). The study revealed that nearby households (treated group) had much stronger food security than distant (control) households by 9.528 to 8.189 across near neighbor matching (NNM) and by 9.444 to 7.619 across radius caliper matching, with these differences being statistically significant at t = 2.0 and t = 2.5, respectively. The results suggest that the government should pursue measures that increase rural households' chances for off-farm jobs in order to improve their well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Child labor in artisanal and small-scale mining: Implications for health, development and poverty Evolving corporate social responsibility practices and their impact on social conflict Mining in Africa: Are local communities paying the price of the global energy transition? Power and community engagement: Developmental impact of community development agreement in Kono diamond mining areas, Sierra Leone Nationalist enclaves: Industrialising the critical mineral boom in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1