生产者对美国牲畜补偿政策的看法

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Applied Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.15232/aas.2024-02543
Victoria L. Campbell , Jada M. Thompson , Jenny L. Apriesnig , Glynn T. Tonsor , Dustin L. Pendell
{"title":"生产者对美国牲畜补偿政策的看法","authors":"Victoria L. Campbell ,&nbsp;Jada M. Thompson ,&nbsp;Jenny L. Apriesnig ,&nbsp;Glynn T. Tonsor ,&nbsp;Dustin L. Pendell","doi":"10.15232/aas.2024-02543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Livestock disease management is crucial for producers. To control and eradicate disease, the US gov- ernment has a duty to depopulate infected or potentially infected animals, and current indemnity policy dictates that producers must receive fair market compensation for depopulated animals. This study surveys producers’ pref- erences regarding livestock indemnity policy to better un- derstand ordered preferences for any changes in the future.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Through a ranked-ordered probit model, we analyzed producers’ rankings of 4 dif- ferent types of indemnity from an online producer survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Based on the responding producers, the most preferred method of livestock indem- nity is fair market value for the animal, and the second most preferred indemnity policy is government-subsidized livestock insurance.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>The results indicate heterogeneity in preference rankings across producers and by producer characteristics. Our findings provide policy- makers with information on producers’ opinions for com- pensation after a disease outbreak. These insights allow legislators to consider producers’ preferences when updat- ing or creating new policies regarding livestock disease management in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"40 4","pages":"Pages 542-548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400082X/pdf?md5=fb07e4a5ca0207062598d791b93a5a97&pid=1-s2.0-S259028652400082X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Producer perceptions of US livestock indemnity policy\",\"authors\":\"Victoria L. Campbell ,&nbsp;Jada M. Thompson ,&nbsp;Jenny L. Apriesnig ,&nbsp;Glynn T. Tonsor ,&nbsp;Dustin L. Pendell\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/aas.2024-02543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Livestock disease management is crucial for producers. To control and eradicate disease, the US gov- ernment has a duty to depopulate infected or potentially infected animals, and current indemnity policy dictates that producers must receive fair market compensation for depopulated animals. This study surveys producers’ pref- erences regarding livestock indemnity policy to better un- derstand ordered preferences for any changes in the future.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Through a ranked-ordered probit model, we analyzed producers’ rankings of 4 dif- ferent types of indemnity from an online producer survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Based on the responding producers, the most preferred method of livestock indem- nity is fair market value for the animal, and the second most preferred indemnity policy is government-subsidized livestock insurance.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>The results indicate heterogeneity in preference rankings across producers and by producer characteristics. Our findings provide policy- makers with information on producers’ opinions for com- pensation after a disease outbreak. These insights allow legislators to consider producers’ preferences when updat- ing or creating new policies regarding livestock disease management in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 542-548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400082X/pdf?md5=fb07e4a5ca0207062598d791b93a5a97&pid=1-s2.0-S259028652400082X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400082X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259028652400082X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标牲畜疾病管理对生产者至关重要。为了控制和根除疾病,美国政府有责任扑杀受感染或可能受感染的牲畜,而现行的补偿政策规定,生产者必须为扑杀的牲畜获得公平的市场补偿。本研究调查了生产者对牲畜补偿政策的偏好,以更好地了解他们对未来任何变化的有序偏好。材料与方法我们通过排序-排序 probit 模型,分析了生产者在线调查中对 4 种不同类型补偿的排序。结果与讨论根据受访生产者的情况,最受欢迎的牲畜补偿方式是牲畜的公平市场价值,第二受欢迎的补偿政策是政府补贴的牲畜保险。我们的研究结果为政策制定者提供了有关生产者在疾病爆发后对赔偿意见的信息。这些见解有助于立法者在未来更新或制定有关牲畜疾病管理的新政策时考虑生产者的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Producer perceptions of US livestock indemnity policy

Objective

Livestock disease management is crucial for producers. To control and eradicate disease, the US gov- ernment has a duty to depopulate infected or potentially infected animals, and current indemnity policy dictates that producers must receive fair market compensation for depopulated animals. This study surveys producers’ pref- erences regarding livestock indemnity policy to better un- derstand ordered preferences for any changes in the future.

Materials and Methods

Through a ranked-ordered probit model, we analyzed producers’ rankings of 4 dif- ferent types of indemnity from an online producer survey.

Results and Discussion

Based on the responding producers, the most preferred method of livestock indem- nity is fair market value for the animal, and the second most preferred indemnity policy is government-subsidized livestock insurance.

Implications and Applications

The results indicate heterogeneity in preference rankings across producers and by producer characteristics. Our findings provide policy- makers with information on producers’ opinions for com- pensation after a disease outbreak. These insights allow legislators to consider producers’ preferences when updat- ing or creating new policies regarding livestock disease management in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Call for Submissions Fabrication yields and allometric growth coefficients of carcass components of serially slaughtered implanted or non-implanted beef steers Comparison of a single extended-release implant and a re-implant strategy on performance and carcass characteristics of beef finishing heifers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1