评估建筑物可解构性的关键因素:探索性和确认性因素分析

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Engineering and Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clet.2024.100790
Habeeb Balogun , Hafiz Alaka , Saheed Ajayi , Christian Nnaemeka Egwim
{"title":"评估建筑物可解构性的关键因素:探索性和确认性因素分析","authors":"Habeeb Balogun ,&nbsp;Hafiz Alaka ,&nbsp;Saheed Ajayi ,&nbsp;Christian Nnaemeka Egwim","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In various cities/other urban settlements, buildings are replaced with newer stocks, ending many buildings' lives. Unfortunately, these buildings nearing or at end-of-useful lives are mostly not deconstructed; instead, they get demolished, resulting in waste generation and pollution, among other environmental concerns. Deconstruction supports closing the material loop in construction, facilitating reuse at end-of-life of the building; however, it is not always easy to assess the feasibility of deconstruction for existing buildings – deconstructability. For this purpose, this paper investigated critical factors that needed to be checked to make informed decisions about the deconstructability of buildings. These factors cover economic, social, environmental, legal, and technical dimensions. Based on the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), 31 significant drivers were identified. These drivers were classed into seven factors. The findings in this paper contribute to the practice of deconstruction, mainly supporting deconstructability decision-making and are helpful for deconstruction/demolition auditors, waste-management consultants and/or other stakeholders with waste minimisation goals, particularly for buildings nearing or at the end-of-useful lives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100790"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000703/pdfft?md5=c37708773ccb76e97b8570dfa07305a4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000703-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical factors for assessing building deconstructability: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis\",\"authors\":\"Habeeb Balogun ,&nbsp;Hafiz Alaka ,&nbsp;Saheed Ajayi ,&nbsp;Christian Nnaemeka Egwim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In various cities/other urban settlements, buildings are replaced with newer stocks, ending many buildings' lives. Unfortunately, these buildings nearing or at end-of-useful lives are mostly not deconstructed; instead, they get demolished, resulting in waste generation and pollution, among other environmental concerns. Deconstruction supports closing the material loop in construction, facilitating reuse at end-of-life of the building; however, it is not always easy to assess the feasibility of deconstruction for existing buildings – deconstructability. For this purpose, this paper investigated critical factors that needed to be checked to make informed decisions about the deconstructability of buildings. These factors cover economic, social, environmental, legal, and technical dimensions. Based on the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), 31 significant drivers were identified. These drivers were classed into seven factors. The findings in this paper contribute to the practice of deconstruction, mainly supporting deconstructability decision-making and are helpful for deconstruction/demolition auditors, waste-management consultants and/or other stakeholders with waste minimisation goals, particularly for buildings nearing or at the end-of-useful lives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000703/pdfft?md5=c37708773ccb76e97b8570dfa07305a4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000703-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不同的城市/其他城市住区,建筑物被新的建筑所取代,许多建筑物的寿命就此结束。遗憾的是,这些即将或即将结束使用年限的建筑大多没有进行解构,而是被拆除,从而导致废物的产生和污染,以及其他环境问题。解构支持建筑材料的闭合循环,有利于在建筑物使用寿命结束时进行再利用;然而,评估现有建筑物的解构可行性--可解构性--并非易事。为此,本文调查了在对建筑物的可解构性做出明智决定时需要检查的关键因素。这些因素包括经济、社会、环境、法律和技术等方面。根据探索性因子分析 (EFA) 和确认性因子分析 (CFA),确定了 31 个重要的驱动因素。这些驱动因素被分为七个因子。本文的研究结果有助于解构实践,主要支持可解构性决策,并对解构/拆除审计师、废物管理顾问和/或其他以废物最小化为目标的利益相关者有所帮助,特别是对接近或处于使用寿命末期的建筑物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical factors for assessing building deconstructability: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis

In various cities/other urban settlements, buildings are replaced with newer stocks, ending many buildings' lives. Unfortunately, these buildings nearing or at end-of-useful lives are mostly not deconstructed; instead, they get demolished, resulting in waste generation and pollution, among other environmental concerns. Deconstruction supports closing the material loop in construction, facilitating reuse at end-of-life of the building; however, it is not always easy to assess the feasibility of deconstruction for existing buildings – deconstructability. For this purpose, this paper investigated critical factors that needed to be checked to make informed decisions about the deconstructability of buildings. These factors cover economic, social, environmental, legal, and technical dimensions. Based on the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), 31 significant drivers were identified. These drivers were classed into seven factors. The findings in this paper contribute to the practice of deconstruction, mainly supporting deconstructability decision-making and are helpful for deconstruction/demolition auditors, waste-management consultants and/or other stakeholders with waste minimisation goals, particularly for buildings nearing or at the end-of-useful lives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Guidelines for implementing cleaner production strategies in a natural rubber gloves manufacturing industry How does the use of cryptocurrency affect circular economy practices in Iranian manufacturing companies? Optimization of alkali-activated ladle slag-fly ash composites using a Taguchi-TOPSIS hybrid algorithm The effects of joint process parameters of two-step manufacturing processes on the mechanical performance of biocomposites using Taguchi and multiple regression techniques A tiered NARX model for forecasting day-ahead energy production in distributed solar PV systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1