消费者创新动机对消费者接受自主配送机器人的影响

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104030
Min Wu, Angie Shi Qi Lin, Kum Fai Yuen
{"title":"消费者创新动机对消费者接受自主配送机器人的影响","authors":"Min Wu,&nbsp;Angie Shi Qi Lin,&nbsp;Kum Fai Yuen","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research aimed to examine the impacts of motivated consumer innovativeness on customers’ acceptance of autonomous delivery robots (ADRs) using the privacy calculus theory (PCT) and motivated consumer innovativeness theory (MCI). It was suggested that this impact was mediated by perceived risks and perceived cooperativeness. Four hundred and fifty survey responses were gathered through a stratified random sampling approach to effectively represent the population of Singapore, ensuring the sample’s representativeness. The acquired data underwent analysis via structural equation modelling, uncovering that motivated consumer innovativeness (MCI) (i.e. functional MCI, hedonic MCI, cognitive MCI, and social MCI) influences the perceived (privacy) risks of using ADRs. In addition, the perceived risks influence the perceived cooperativeness of ADRs. Furthermore, the perceived risks and perceived cooperativeness both influence the consumers’ acceptance of ADRs. The combination of theories is highly effective in explaining consumers’ acceptance of ADRs, accounting for a substantial 78.3% of the variance. These findings highlight the significant impact of enhancing perceptions of ADR cooperativeness and transparent communication about privacy and safety on consumer acceptance. This, in turn, informs effective policy and strategic decisions for ADR development and deployment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 104030"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of motivated consumer innovativeness on consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots\",\"authors\":\"Min Wu,&nbsp;Angie Shi Qi Lin,&nbsp;Kum Fai Yuen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research aimed to examine the impacts of motivated consumer innovativeness on customers’ acceptance of autonomous delivery robots (ADRs) using the privacy calculus theory (PCT) and motivated consumer innovativeness theory (MCI). It was suggested that this impact was mediated by perceived risks and perceived cooperativeness. Four hundred and fifty survey responses were gathered through a stratified random sampling approach to effectively represent the population of Singapore, ensuring the sample’s representativeness. The acquired data underwent analysis via structural equation modelling, uncovering that motivated consumer innovativeness (MCI) (i.e. functional MCI, hedonic MCI, cognitive MCI, and social MCI) influences the perceived (privacy) risks of using ADRs. In addition, the perceived risks influence the perceived cooperativeness of ADRs. Furthermore, the perceived risks and perceived cooperativeness both influence the consumers’ acceptance of ADRs. The combination of theories is highly effective in explaining consumers’ acceptance of ADRs, accounting for a substantial 78.3% of the variance. These findings highlight the significant impact of enhancing perceptions of ADR cooperativeness and transparent communication about privacy and safety on consumer acceptance. This, in turn, informs effective policy and strategic decisions for ADR development and deployment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003266\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003266","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用隐私计算理论(PCT)和消费者创新动机理论(MCI),研究消费者创新动机对顾客接受自主配送机器人(ADRs)的影响。研究表明,这种影响是以感知风险和感知合作性为中介的。通过分层随机抽样方法收集了 450 份调查问卷,以有效代表新加坡人口,确保样本的代表性。获得的数据通过结构方程模型进行分析,发现消费者创新动机(MCI)(即功能性 MCI、享乐性 MCI、认知性 MCI 和社交性 MCI)影响使用 ADR 的感知(隐私)风险。此外,感知到的风险还会影响对 ADR 的感知合作度。此外,感知风险和感知合作性都会影响消费者对 ADR 的接受程度。这些理论的组合在解释消费者对 ADR 的接受度方面非常有效,占了方差的 78.3%。这些研究结果突出表明,提高消费者对 ADR 合作性的认知以及有关隐私和安全的透明沟通对消费者的接受度有重大影响。这反过来又为制定和部署 ADR 的有效政策和战略决策提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of motivated consumer innovativeness on consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots

This research aimed to examine the impacts of motivated consumer innovativeness on customers’ acceptance of autonomous delivery robots (ADRs) using the privacy calculus theory (PCT) and motivated consumer innovativeness theory (MCI). It was suggested that this impact was mediated by perceived risks and perceived cooperativeness. Four hundred and fifty survey responses were gathered through a stratified random sampling approach to effectively represent the population of Singapore, ensuring the sample’s representativeness. The acquired data underwent analysis via structural equation modelling, uncovering that motivated consumer innovativeness (MCI) (i.e. functional MCI, hedonic MCI, cognitive MCI, and social MCI) influences the perceived (privacy) risks of using ADRs. In addition, the perceived risks influence the perceived cooperativeness of ADRs. Furthermore, the perceived risks and perceived cooperativeness both influence the consumers’ acceptance of ADRs. The combination of theories is highly effective in explaining consumers’ acceptance of ADRs, accounting for a substantial 78.3% of the variance. These findings highlight the significant impact of enhancing perceptions of ADR cooperativeness and transparent communication about privacy and safety on consumer acceptance. This, in turn, informs effective policy and strategic decisions for ADR development and deployment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1