基于地方的区域创新体系建设政策建议。来自中国六个高新技术产业开发区的证据

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105322
{"title":"基于地方的区域创新体系建设政策建议。来自中国六个高新技术产业开发区的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Place-based policies (PBPs) for innovation have profoundly influenced multi-scalar place-builders to bring supra-regional and intra-regional resources into specific spaces to establish so-called ‘regional innovation systems’. Drawing on worldwide debates on PBPs, particularly the criticism of ‘one-size-fits-all’ approaches and the ‘innovation paradox’ in regional innovation policies, we argue that the impacts of PBPs are not a binary issue; rather, they are a complex configuration rooted in regional contexts or intervened with multi-layered innovation systems. A two-dimensional typology with four PBP propositions – <em>investing</em>, <em>demonstrating</em>, <em>interacting</em>, and <em>integrating</em> – is conceptualised. Furthermore, we take a representative PBP – high-tech industrial development zones in China – as a case study and use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to examine the conditional configurations in real-world policy making, acknowledging the multifaceted and complex interactions within innovation systems. The results indicate that supra-regional pipelines, such as global investments, interact with or adapt to specific regional contexts when introduced to localities. In certain propositions, national platforms can act as a bridge, channelling external resources to targeted territories, which can realise innovation transformations that are not exclusively rooted in specific regional conditions. This paper has implications for configurational PBP making in lagging regions. Ultimately, we call for further in-depth qualitative research on the relationship between the nature of innovation development and regional context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propositions for place-based policies in making regional innovation systems. Evidence from six high-tech industrial development zones in China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Place-based policies (PBPs) for innovation have profoundly influenced multi-scalar place-builders to bring supra-regional and intra-regional resources into specific spaces to establish so-called ‘regional innovation systems’. Drawing on worldwide debates on PBPs, particularly the criticism of ‘one-size-fits-all’ approaches and the ‘innovation paradox’ in regional innovation policies, we argue that the impacts of PBPs are not a binary issue; rather, they are a complex configuration rooted in regional contexts or intervened with multi-layered innovation systems. A two-dimensional typology with four PBP propositions – <em>investing</em>, <em>demonstrating</em>, <em>interacting</em>, and <em>integrating</em> – is conceptualised. Furthermore, we take a representative PBP – high-tech industrial development zones in China – as a case study and use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to examine the conditional configurations in real-world policy making, acknowledging the multifaceted and complex interactions within innovation systems. The results indicate that supra-regional pipelines, such as global investments, interact with or adapt to specific regional contexts when introduced to localities. In certain propositions, national platforms can act as a bridge, channelling external resources to targeted territories, which can realise innovation transformations that are not exclusively rooted in specific regional conditions. This paper has implications for configurational PBP making in lagging regions. Ultimately, we call for further in-depth qualitative research on the relationship between the nature of innovation development and regional context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124005365\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124005365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以地方为基础的创新政策(PBPs)对多层面的地方建设者产生了深远影响,他们将超区域和区域内的资源引入特定空间,建立所谓的 "区域创新体系"。我们借鉴世界范围内关于 "区域创新政策 "的讨论,特别是对 "一刀切 "方法和区域创新政策中的 "创新悖论 "的批评,认为 "区域创新政策 "的影响不是一个二元问题,而是植根于区域背景或与多层次创新体系相互影响的复杂结构。我们提出了一个二维类型学概念,其中包含四种实践性项目主张--投资、示范、互动和整合。此外,我们还以一个具有代表性的 PBP--中国的高新技术产业开发区--为案例,使用模糊集定性比较分析来研究现实世界政策制定中的条件配置,同时承认创新系统内部存在着多方面的复杂互动。研究结果表明,超区域管道(如全球投资)在引入地方时,会与特定区域背景产生互动或适应。在某些命题中,国家平台可以发挥桥梁作用,将外部资源引入目标地区,从而实现并非完全植根于特定地区条件的创新转型。本文对落后地区制定配置型建设和平计划具有启示意义。最后,我们呼吁就创新发展的性质与地区环境之间的关系开展进一步的深入定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Propositions for place-based policies in making regional innovation systems. Evidence from six high-tech industrial development zones in China

Place-based policies (PBPs) for innovation have profoundly influenced multi-scalar place-builders to bring supra-regional and intra-regional resources into specific spaces to establish so-called ‘regional innovation systems’. Drawing on worldwide debates on PBPs, particularly the criticism of ‘one-size-fits-all’ approaches and the ‘innovation paradox’ in regional innovation policies, we argue that the impacts of PBPs are not a binary issue; rather, they are a complex configuration rooted in regional contexts or intervened with multi-layered innovation systems. A two-dimensional typology with four PBP propositions – investing, demonstrating, interacting, and integrating – is conceptualised. Furthermore, we take a representative PBP – high-tech industrial development zones in China – as a case study and use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to examine the conditional configurations in real-world policy making, acknowledging the multifaceted and complex interactions within innovation systems. The results indicate that supra-regional pipelines, such as global investments, interact with or adapt to specific regional contexts when introduced to localities. In certain propositions, national platforms can act as a bridge, channelling external resources to targeted territories, which can realise innovation transformations that are not exclusively rooted in specific regional conditions. This paper has implications for configurational PBP making in lagging regions. Ultimately, we call for further in-depth qualitative research on the relationship between the nature of innovation development and regional context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
How do complete streets policies and legislative ordinances implement explicit wording regarding low-income populations and communities of color? A qualitative analysis Hot and bothered: Exploring the effect of heat on pedestrian route choice behavior and accessibility Does homeownership improve physical health? Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Hong Kong The recovery from the pandemic: A spatial-temporal analysis on the changes in mobility and public attitude in Singapore How to build vibrant communities by utilizing functional zones? A community-detection-based approach for revealing the association between land use and community vibrancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1