从显微镜分析切削/耙削工具的切痕特征

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic science international Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112197
{"title":"从显微镜分析切削/耙削工具的切痕特征","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evaluating sharp force trauma (SFT) injuries to bone inflicted by a larger class of chopping/hacking tools (i.e., swords, axes, hatchets, machetes, and cleavers) is a growing area within the field of forensics. Previous studies have demonstrated promise regarding tool differentiation through the utilization of microscopic cut mark characteristics. However, this is an area that warrants additional investigation as there has yet to be a comprehensive study that incorporates the majority of these microscopic chopping/hacking cut mark characteristics into one analysis. The purpose of the current research was to analyze a large sample of microscopic cut mark characteristics derived from the current chopping/hacking literature to determine if differentiation of tool type could be made based on the microscopic cut mark characteristics. An additional goal of the current research is to develop standardization guidelines for the assessment of cut marks, focusing on a comprehensive suite of microscopic cut mark characteristics commonly observed in the existing literature. The skeletal sample for the current research was derived from a previous macroscopic cut mark characteristic experiment where trauma was inflicted to 20 partially fleshed domestic pig (<em>Sus scrofa domesticus</em>) limbs utilizing four chopping/hacking tools (i.e., axe, hatchet, machete, and cleaver) as well as a large carving knife for comparison. Cut marks were evaluated for 15 microscopic cut mark characteristics to assess statistical significance. Utilizing a chi-square analysis, nine of the 15 microscopic cut mark characteristics demonstrated statistically significant differences in relation to the tool utilized, indicating moderate to relatively strong effect sizes. For example, it should be possible to use a combination of microscopic cut mark characteristics to potentially indicate which chopping/hacking tool inflicted trauma when analyzing bones. In particular, examining the characteristics such as regularity of the cut mark edges along with the occurrence of uprising, fossae/depressions, and microscopic fractures can suggest or exclude tool class within forensic contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microscopic analysis of cut mark characteristics from chopping/hacking tools\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Evaluating sharp force trauma (SFT) injuries to bone inflicted by a larger class of chopping/hacking tools (i.e., swords, axes, hatchets, machetes, and cleavers) is a growing area within the field of forensics. Previous studies have demonstrated promise regarding tool differentiation through the utilization of microscopic cut mark characteristics. However, this is an area that warrants additional investigation as there has yet to be a comprehensive study that incorporates the majority of these microscopic chopping/hacking cut mark characteristics into one analysis. The purpose of the current research was to analyze a large sample of microscopic cut mark characteristics derived from the current chopping/hacking literature to determine if differentiation of tool type could be made based on the microscopic cut mark characteristics. An additional goal of the current research is to develop standardization guidelines for the assessment of cut marks, focusing on a comprehensive suite of microscopic cut mark characteristics commonly observed in the existing literature. The skeletal sample for the current research was derived from a previous macroscopic cut mark characteristic experiment where trauma was inflicted to 20 partially fleshed domestic pig (<em>Sus scrofa domesticus</em>) limbs utilizing four chopping/hacking tools (i.e., axe, hatchet, machete, and cleaver) as well as a large carving knife for comparison. Cut marks were evaluated for 15 microscopic cut mark characteristics to assess statistical significance. Utilizing a chi-square analysis, nine of the 15 microscopic cut mark characteristics demonstrated statistically significant differences in relation to the tool utilized, indicating moderate to relatively strong effect sizes. For example, it should be possible to use a combination of microscopic cut mark characteristics to potentially indicate which chopping/hacking tool inflicted trauma when analyzing bones. In particular, examining the characteristics such as regularity of the cut mark edges along with the occurrence of uprising, fossae/depressions, and microscopic fractures can suggest or exclude tool class within forensic contexts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic science international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic science international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824002780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824002780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法医学领域,评估由大量砍/斫工具(即剑、斧、弯刀、砍刀和菜刀)对骨骼造成的锐力创伤(SFT)是一个不断发展的领域。以往的研究表明,通过利用显微切痕特征来区分工具大有可为。然而,这是一个需要进行更多调查的领域,因为还没有一项全面的研究能将这些微观砍/斫切痕特征中的大多数特征整合到一项分析中。当前研究的目的是分析从当前切削/捶打文献中获得的大量微观切痕特征样本,以确定是否可以根据微观切痕特征区分刀具类型。当前研究的另一个目标是制定评估切痕的标准化指南,重点是现有文献中常见的一整套微观切痕特征。本次研究的骨骼样本来自于之前的一项宏观切痕特征实验,该实验使用四种劈砍工具(即斧子、斧头、砍刀和菜刀)以及一把大型雕刻刀对 20 只部分带肉的家猪(Sus scrofa domesticus)肢体造成创伤,并进行对比。对切割痕迹的 15 个微观切割痕迹特征进行了评估,以评估统计意义。通过卡方分析,15 个微观切痕特征中的 9 个特征与所使用的工具在统计学上存在显著差异,表明存在中等至相对较强的影响大小。例如,在分析骨骼时,可以综合使用显微切痕特征来确定是哪种砍/斫工具造成了创伤。特别是,通过研究切痕边缘的规则性以及出现的隆起、窝/凹陷和显微骨折等特征,可以在法证环境中提示或排除工具类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microscopic analysis of cut mark characteristics from chopping/hacking tools

Evaluating sharp force trauma (SFT) injuries to bone inflicted by a larger class of chopping/hacking tools (i.e., swords, axes, hatchets, machetes, and cleavers) is a growing area within the field of forensics. Previous studies have demonstrated promise regarding tool differentiation through the utilization of microscopic cut mark characteristics. However, this is an area that warrants additional investigation as there has yet to be a comprehensive study that incorporates the majority of these microscopic chopping/hacking cut mark characteristics into one analysis. The purpose of the current research was to analyze a large sample of microscopic cut mark characteristics derived from the current chopping/hacking literature to determine if differentiation of tool type could be made based on the microscopic cut mark characteristics. An additional goal of the current research is to develop standardization guidelines for the assessment of cut marks, focusing on a comprehensive suite of microscopic cut mark characteristics commonly observed in the existing literature. The skeletal sample for the current research was derived from a previous macroscopic cut mark characteristic experiment where trauma was inflicted to 20 partially fleshed domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) limbs utilizing four chopping/hacking tools (i.e., axe, hatchet, machete, and cleaver) as well as a large carving knife for comparison. Cut marks were evaluated for 15 microscopic cut mark characteristics to assess statistical significance. Utilizing a chi-square analysis, nine of the 15 microscopic cut mark characteristics demonstrated statistically significant differences in relation to the tool utilized, indicating moderate to relatively strong effect sizes. For example, it should be possible to use a combination of microscopic cut mark characteristics to potentially indicate which chopping/hacking tool inflicted trauma when analyzing bones. In particular, examining the characteristics such as regularity of the cut mark edges along with the occurrence of uprising, fossae/depressions, and microscopic fractures can suggest or exclude tool class within forensic contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity assessment of the modified ABAcard® HemaTrace® and p30 immunochromatographic test cards Degradation and preservation of nitrites in whole blood Post mortem chiral analysis of MDMA and MDA in human blood and hair The 2 stages of cartridge primer toolmark production and the implied impact of cartridge manufacturing tolerances Letter to Editor regarding article “Ok Google, Start a Fire. IoT devices as witnesses and actors in fire investigations”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1