原发性直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术平面外和局部复发性直肠癌盆腔外扩张术的中国专家共识

Meng Zhuang , Yingchao Wu , Bin Tang , Jian Zhang , Tenghui Ma , Xicheng Wang , Yuan Tang , Yong Wu , Xin Wang , Xishan Wang , Jianqiang Tang
{"title":"原发性直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术平面外和局部复发性直肠癌盆腔外扩张术的中国专家共识","authors":"Meng Zhuang ,&nbsp;Yingchao Wu ,&nbsp;Bin Tang ,&nbsp;Jian Zhang ,&nbsp;Tenghui Ma ,&nbsp;Xicheng Wang ,&nbsp;Yuan Tang ,&nbsp;Yong Wu ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Xishan Wang ,&nbsp;Jianqiang Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2024.100053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pelvic exenteration is often required for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision (PRC-bTME) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Some patients with radical resection can achieve long-term survival, but they need to face risks, such as huge surgical trauma, serious perioperative complications, permanent loss of organ function and decline in quality of life. Preoperative evaluation of PRC-bTME and LRRC should emphasize multidisciplinary collaboration and develop individualized diagnosis and treatment strategies. The principles of function preservation and risk-benefit balance in surgery oncology should be followed, and R<sub>0</sub> resection should be emphasized. Perioperative complications, surgical trauma and organ function loss should be minimized to achieve the best quality control and balance point. This consensus was formulated by the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Gastrointestinal Surgery Committee of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care. The draft was formed based on the summary of domestic and foreign research progress and expert experience. After discussion, review and modification by experts, an anonymous voting was conducted for each major opinion, and in-depth verification was carried out according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. Finally, the Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration with primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer (2023 edition) was formed. This consensus mainly summarizes the indications and contraindications of pelvic exenteration (PE) for PRC-bTME and LRRC, preoperative diagnosis and evaluation, perioperative treatment, as well as the resection scope, surgical methods, reconstruction of related organs, safety and complications of PE, postoperative follow-up and other issues, in order to provide guidance for PE in patients with PRC-bTME and LRRC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100053"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000217/pdfft?md5=241911fb65a464f33f5d78b6e59475f2&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X24000217-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Meng Zhuang ,&nbsp;Yingchao Wu ,&nbsp;Bin Tang ,&nbsp;Jian Zhang ,&nbsp;Tenghui Ma ,&nbsp;Xicheng Wang ,&nbsp;Yuan Tang ,&nbsp;Yong Wu ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Xishan Wang ,&nbsp;Jianqiang Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cson.2024.100053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pelvic exenteration is often required for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision (PRC-bTME) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Some patients with radical resection can achieve long-term survival, but they need to face risks, such as huge surgical trauma, serious perioperative complications, permanent loss of organ function and decline in quality of life. Preoperative evaluation of PRC-bTME and LRRC should emphasize multidisciplinary collaboration and develop individualized diagnosis and treatment strategies. The principles of function preservation and risk-benefit balance in surgery oncology should be followed, and R<sub>0</sub> resection should be emphasized. Perioperative complications, surgical trauma and organ function loss should be minimized to achieve the best quality control and balance point. This consensus was formulated by the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Gastrointestinal Surgery Committee of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care. The draft was formed based on the summary of domestic and foreign research progress and expert experience. After discussion, review and modification by experts, an anonymous voting was conducted for each major opinion, and in-depth verification was carried out according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. Finally, the Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration with primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer (2023 edition) was formed. This consensus mainly summarizes the indications and contraindications of pelvic exenteration (PE) for PRC-bTME and LRRC, preoperative diagnosis and evaluation, perioperative treatment, as well as the resection scope, surgical methods, reconstruction of related organs, safety and complications of PE, postoperative follow-up and other issues, in order to provide guidance for PE in patients with PRC-bTME and LRRC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000217/pdfft?md5=241911fb65a464f33f5d78b6e59475f2&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X24000217-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原发性直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术(PRC-bTME)和局部复发性直肠癌(LRRC)通常需要进行盆腔外扩张术。部分患者通过根治性切除术可以获得长期生存,但需要面对巨大的手术创伤、严重的围手术期并发症、永久性器官功能丧失和生活质量下降等风险。PRC-bTME和LRRC的术前评估应强调多学科协作,制定个体化诊疗策略。应遵循肿瘤外科的功能保护和风险收益平衡原则,强调 R0 切除。应尽量减少围手术期并发症、手术创伤和器官功能丧失,以达到最佳的质量控制和平衡点。本共识由中国医师协会结直肠癌专业委员会和中国医疗保健国际交流促进会胃肠外科专业委员会共同制定。草案是在总结国内外研究进展和专家经验的基础上形成的。经专家讨论、审核、修改后,对各主要意见进行了匿名投票,并按照循证医学原则进行了深入论证。最终,形成了《原发性直肠癌全直肠系膜切除平面以外及局部复发直肠癌盆腔外切术中国专家共识(2023年版)》。该共识主要总结了PRC-bTME和LRRC盆腔外扩张术(PE)的适应证和禁忌证、术前诊断和评估、围手术期治疗以及切除范围、手术方法、相关器官的重建、PE的安全性和并发症、术后随访等问题,为PRC-bTME和LRRC患者的PE提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer

Pelvic exenteration is often required for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision (PRC-bTME) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Some patients with radical resection can achieve long-term survival, but they need to face risks, such as huge surgical trauma, serious perioperative complications, permanent loss of organ function and decline in quality of life. Preoperative evaluation of PRC-bTME and LRRC should emphasize multidisciplinary collaboration and develop individualized diagnosis and treatment strategies. The principles of function preservation and risk-benefit balance in surgery oncology should be followed, and R0 resection should be emphasized. Perioperative complications, surgical trauma and organ function loss should be minimized to achieve the best quality control and balance point. This consensus was formulated by the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Gastrointestinal Surgery Committee of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care. The draft was formed based on the summary of domestic and foreign research progress and expert experience. After discussion, review and modification by experts, an anonymous voting was conducted for each major opinion, and in-depth verification was carried out according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. Finally, the Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration with primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer (2023 edition) was formed. This consensus mainly summarizes the indications and contraindications of pelvic exenteration (PE) for PRC-bTME and LRRC, preoperative diagnosis and evaluation, perioperative treatment, as well as the resection scope, surgical methods, reconstruction of related organs, safety and complications of PE, postoperative follow-up and other issues, in order to provide guidance for PE in patients with PRC-bTME and LRRC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical frontiers in metastatic disease: Shaping cancer care Individualized surgical approach based on Bismuth-Corlette classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Liquid biopsy for monitoring minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer: A promising approach with clinical implications Diagnostic sensitivity of immune-inflammatory cell proportion in early diagnosis of endometrial cancer Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1