用于前列腺癌质子治疗规划的磁共振成像衍生合成计算机断层扫描评估

Kajsa M.L. Fridström , René M. Winter , Natalie Hornik , Sigrun S. Almberg , Signe Danielsen , Kathrine R. Redalen
{"title":"用于前列腺癌质子治疗规划的磁共振成像衍生合成计算机断层扫描评估","authors":"Kajsa M.L. Fridström ,&nbsp;René M. Winter ,&nbsp;Natalie Hornik ,&nbsp;Sigrun S. Almberg ,&nbsp;Signe Danielsen ,&nbsp;Kathrine R. Redalen","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only workflow is used in photon radiotherapy (RT) today, but not yet for protons. To bring MRI-only proton RT into clinical use, proton dose calculation on MRI-derived synthetic CT (sCT) must be validated. We evaluated proton dose calculation accuracy of prostate cancer proton plans using a commercially available sCT generator already validated for photon planning.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The retrospective planning study included 10 prostate cancer patients who underwent MRI and planning CT (pCT) before RT. sCT were generated from the MRI with MRI Planner v2.3, and compared to pCT using structural mean absolute error (MAE). The pCT was used to create one-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plan and two-field intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) proton plan. Each plan was recalculated on the sCT and compared to pCT doses. Dose volume histogram parameters, gamma analyses and range differences were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median MAE for the body contour was 71 HU. Dose differences between pCT and sCT were small and similar for VMAT and IMPT plans. Median (range) gamma pass rates were lower for IMPT plans with 95.8 (89.3–98.7) % compared to VMAT plans with 99.4 (91.2–99.6) %. The proton range difference was 1.0 (interquartile range –0.1 – 0.2) mm deeper for sCT compared to the reference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MRI-only IMPT planning for prostate cancer seems feasible in a clinical setting for the evaluated beam arrangement and sCT generator. More patients and evaluation of other beam arrangements are needed for a more general conclusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000952/pdfft?md5=bdff56b24bab3515231eb6ae2a486b75&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000952-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging derived synthetic computed tomography for proton therapy planning in prostate cancer\",\"authors\":\"Kajsa M.L. Fridström ,&nbsp;René M. Winter ,&nbsp;Natalie Hornik ,&nbsp;Sigrun S. Almberg ,&nbsp;Signe Danielsen ,&nbsp;Kathrine R. Redalen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only workflow is used in photon radiotherapy (RT) today, but not yet for protons. To bring MRI-only proton RT into clinical use, proton dose calculation on MRI-derived synthetic CT (sCT) must be validated. We evaluated proton dose calculation accuracy of prostate cancer proton plans using a commercially available sCT generator already validated for photon planning.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The retrospective planning study included 10 prostate cancer patients who underwent MRI and planning CT (pCT) before RT. sCT were generated from the MRI with MRI Planner v2.3, and compared to pCT using structural mean absolute error (MAE). The pCT was used to create one-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plan and two-field intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) proton plan. Each plan was recalculated on the sCT and compared to pCT doses. Dose volume histogram parameters, gamma analyses and range differences were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median MAE for the body contour was 71 HU. Dose differences between pCT and sCT were small and similar for VMAT and IMPT plans. Median (range) gamma pass rates were lower for IMPT plans with 95.8 (89.3–98.7) % compared to VMAT plans with 99.4 (91.2–99.6) %. The proton range difference was 1.0 (interquartile range –0.1 – 0.2) mm deeper for sCT compared to the reference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MRI-only IMPT planning for prostate cancer seems feasible in a clinical setting for the evaluated beam arrangement and sCT generator. More patients and evaluation of other beam arrangements are needed for a more general conclusion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000952/pdfft?md5=bdff56b24bab3515231eb6ae2a486b75&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000952-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的目前,光子放射治疗(RT)中使用了仅磁共振成像(MRI)的工作流程,但质子放射治疗尚未使用。要将只使用磁共振成像的质子 RT 应用于临床,必须对磁共振成像衍生的合成 CT(sCT)上的质子剂量计算进行验证。我们评估了前列腺癌质子计划的质子剂量计算准确性,使用的是已通过光子计划验证的市售 sCT 生成器。pCT 用于创建单弧形容积调制弧治疗(VMAT)光子计划和双场强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)质子计划。每个计划都在 sCT 上重新计算,并与 pCT 剂量进行比较。对剂量体积直方图参数、伽马分析和范围差异进行了评估。pCT 和 sCT 的剂量差异很小,VMAT 和 IMPT 计划的剂量差异相似。IMPT计划的伽马通过率中值(范围)为95.8(89.3-98.7)%,低于VMAT计划的99.4(91.2-99.6)%。与参考相比,sCT 的质子射程相差 1.0(四分位间范围 -0.1 - 0.2)毫米。要得出更全面的结论,还需要对更多患者和其他射束排列进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging derived synthetic computed tomography for proton therapy planning in prostate cancer

Background and purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only workflow is used in photon radiotherapy (RT) today, but not yet for protons. To bring MRI-only proton RT into clinical use, proton dose calculation on MRI-derived synthetic CT (sCT) must be validated. We evaluated proton dose calculation accuracy of prostate cancer proton plans using a commercially available sCT generator already validated for photon planning.

Materials and methods

The retrospective planning study included 10 prostate cancer patients who underwent MRI and planning CT (pCT) before RT. sCT were generated from the MRI with MRI Planner v2.3, and compared to pCT using structural mean absolute error (MAE). The pCT was used to create one-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plan and two-field intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) proton plan. Each plan was recalculated on the sCT and compared to pCT doses. Dose volume histogram parameters, gamma analyses and range differences were evaluated.

Results

Median MAE for the body contour was 71 HU. Dose differences between pCT and sCT were small and similar for VMAT and IMPT plans. Median (range) gamma pass rates were lower for IMPT plans with 95.8 (89.3–98.7) % compared to VMAT plans with 99.4 (91.2–99.6) %. The proton range difference was 1.0 (interquartile range –0.1 – 0.2) mm deeper for sCT compared to the reference.

Conclusion

MRI-only IMPT planning for prostate cancer seems feasible in a clinical setting for the evaluated beam arrangement and sCT generator. More patients and evaluation of other beam arrangements are needed for a more general conclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography Technical feasibility of delivering a simultaneous integrated boost in partial breast irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1