{"title":"使用 ALPACA 对自动耳蜗尺寸测量进行评估:一项比较研究。","authors":"Di Liu, Xuesong Wang, Wenwen Zhou, Anzhou Tang","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cochlear dimension measurements are critical in diagnosing and managing congenital sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of an automated landmark approach for measuring cochlear dimensions (A-, B- and H-values).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cochlear parameters from 100 patients were measured by MPR, manual three-dimensional and ALPACA. We assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability as well as inter-method reliability. Statistical analyses were conducted to detect differences between the right and left ears, as well as to assess the relevance of the values obtained using ALPACA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All A-, B-, and H-values measured by the various methods showed a high intra-observer reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, and values gained by ALPACA reaching the highest ICC. Inter-method reliability was at a good level with ICC ranging from 0.51 to 0.86. There were no significant differences between the right and left ears' measured values. Obvious positive correlations existed among cochlear dimensions measured by ALPACA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The ALPACA method can be used to measure cochlear dimensions. Values obtained by the method demonstrate high reliability and consistency with a significant reduction in intra-observer variability compared to results from conventional MPR and manual 3D measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of automatic cochlear dimension measurement using ALPACA: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Di Liu, Xuesong Wang, Wenwen Zhou, Anzhou Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cochlear dimension measurements are critical in diagnosing and managing congenital sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of an automated landmark approach for measuring cochlear dimensions (A-, B- and H-values).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cochlear parameters from 100 patients were measured by MPR, manual three-dimensional and ALPACA. We assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability as well as inter-method reliability. Statistical analyses were conducted to detect differences between the right and left ears, as well as to assess the relevance of the values obtained using ALPACA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All A-, B-, and H-values measured by the various methods showed a high intra-observer reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, and values gained by ALPACA reaching the highest ICC. Inter-method reliability was at a good level with ICC ranging from 0.51 to 0.86. There were no significant differences between the right and left ears' measured values. Obvious positive correlations existed among cochlear dimensions measured by ALPACA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The ALPACA method can be used to measure cochlear dimensions. Values obtained by the method demonstrate high reliability and consistency with a significant reduction in intra-observer variability compared to results from conventional MPR and manual 3D measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:耳蜗尺寸测量是诊断和治疗先天性感音神经性听力损失的关键:耳蜗尺寸测量是诊断和管理先天性感音神经性听力损失的关键:评估自动地标法测量耳蜗尺寸(A 值、B 值和 H 值)的可行性和可靠性:通过MPR、手动三维和ALPACA测量了100名患者的耳蜗参数。我们评估了观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性以及方法之间的可靠性。我们进行了统计分析,以检测左右耳之间的差异,并评估使用 ALPACA 所获数值的相关性:各种方法测量的所有 A 值、B 值和 H 值均显示出较高的观察者内部可靠性,类内相关系数 (ICC) 在 0.70 至 0.99 之间,其中 ALPACA 获得的数值 ICC 最高。方法间的可靠性也达到了良好水平,ICC 在 0.51 至 0.86 之间。左右耳的测量值无明显差异。ALPACA 测量的耳蜗尺寸之间存在明显的正相关:ALPACA方法可用于测量耳蜗尺寸。与传统的 MPR 和人工三维测量结果相比,该方法获得的数值具有高度的可靠性和一致性,观察者内部的变异性显著降低。
Evaluation of automatic cochlear dimension measurement using ALPACA: a comparative study.
Background: Cochlear dimension measurements are critical in diagnosing and managing congenital sensorineural hearing loss.
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of an automated landmark approach for measuring cochlear dimensions (A-, B- and H-values).
Material and methods: Cochlear parameters from 100 patients were measured by MPR, manual three-dimensional and ALPACA. We assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability as well as inter-method reliability. Statistical analyses were conducted to detect differences between the right and left ears, as well as to assess the relevance of the values obtained using ALPACA.
Results: All A-, B-, and H-values measured by the various methods showed a high intra-observer reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, and values gained by ALPACA reaching the highest ICC. Inter-method reliability was at a good level with ICC ranging from 0.51 to 0.86. There were no significant differences between the right and left ears' measured values. Obvious positive correlations existed among cochlear dimensions measured by ALPACA.
Conclusions and significance: The ALPACA method can be used to measure cochlear dimensions. Values obtained by the method demonstrate high reliability and consistency with a significant reduction in intra-observer variability compared to results from conventional MPR and manual 3D measurements.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.