使用 ALPACA 对自动耳蜗尺寸测量进行评估:一项比较研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500
Di Liu, Xuesong Wang, Wenwen Zhou, Anzhou Tang
{"title":"使用 ALPACA 对自动耳蜗尺寸测量进行评估:一项比较研究。","authors":"Di Liu, Xuesong Wang, Wenwen Zhou, Anzhou Tang","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cochlear dimension measurements are critical in diagnosing and managing congenital sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of an automated landmark approach for measuring cochlear dimensions (A-, B- and H-values).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cochlear parameters from 100 patients were measured by MPR, manual three-dimensional and ALPACA. We assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability as well as inter-method reliability. Statistical analyses were conducted to detect differences between the right and left ears, as well as to assess the relevance of the values obtained using ALPACA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All A-, B-, and H-values measured by the various methods showed a high intra-observer reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, and values gained by ALPACA reaching the highest ICC. Inter-method reliability was at a good level with ICC ranging from 0.51 to 0.86. There were no significant differences between the right and left ears' measured values. Obvious positive correlations existed among cochlear dimensions measured by ALPACA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The ALPACA method can be used to measure cochlear dimensions. Values obtained by the method demonstrate high reliability and consistency with a significant reduction in intra-observer variability compared to results from conventional MPR and manual 3D measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of automatic cochlear dimension measurement using ALPACA: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Di Liu, Xuesong Wang, Wenwen Zhou, Anzhou Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cochlear dimension measurements are critical in diagnosing and managing congenital sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of an automated landmark approach for measuring cochlear dimensions (A-, B- and H-values).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cochlear parameters from 100 patients were measured by MPR, manual three-dimensional and ALPACA. We assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability as well as inter-method reliability. Statistical analyses were conducted to detect differences between the right and left ears, as well as to assess the relevance of the values obtained using ALPACA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All A-, B-, and H-values measured by the various methods showed a high intra-observer reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, and values gained by ALPACA reaching the highest ICC. Inter-method reliability was at a good level with ICC ranging from 0.51 to 0.86. There were no significant differences between the right and left ears' measured values. Obvious positive correlations existed among cochlear dimensions measured by ALPACA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The ALPACA method can be used to measure cochlear dimensions. Values obtained by the method demonstrate high reliability and consistency with a significant reduction in intra-observer variability compared to results from conventional MPR and manual 3D measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2391500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耳蜗尺寸测量是诊断和治疗先天性感音神经性听力损失的关键:耳蜗尺寸测量是诊断和管理先天性感音神经性听力损失的关键:评估自动地标法测量耳蜗尺寸(A 值、B 值和 H 值)的可行性和可靠性:通过MPR、手动三维和ALPACA测量了100名患者的耳蜗参数。我们评估了观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性以及方法之间的可靠性。我们进行了统计分析,以检测左右耳之间的差异,并评估使用 ALPACA 所获数值的相关性:各种方法测量的所有 A 值、B 值和 H 值均显示出较高的观察者内部可靠性,类内相关系数 (ICC) 在 0.70 至 0.99 之间,其中 ALPACA 获得的数值 ICC 最高。方法间的可靠性也达到了良好水平,ICC 在 0.51 至 0.86 之间。左右耳的测量值无明显差异。ALPACA 测量的耳蜗尺寸之间存在明显的正相关:ALPACA方法可用于测量耳蜗尺寸。与传统的 MPR 和人工三维测量结果相比,该方法获得的数值具有高度的可靠性和一致性,观察者内部的变异性显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of automatic cochlear dimension measurement using ALPACA: a comparative study.

Background: Cochlear dimension measurements are critical in diagnosing and managing congenital sensorineural hearing loss.

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of an automated landmark approach for measuring cochlear dimensions (A-, B- and H-values).

Material and methods: Cochlear parameters from 100 patients were measured by MPR, manual three-dimensional and ALPACA. We assessed intra- and inter-observer reliability as well as inter-method reliability. Statistical analyses were conducted to detect differences between the right and left ears, as well as to assess the relevance of the values obtained using ALPACA.

Results: All A-, B-, and H-values measured by the various methods showed a high intra-observer reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, and values gained by ALPACA reaching the highest ICC. Inter-method reliability was at a good level with ICC ranging from 0.51 to 0.86. There were no significant differences between the right and left ears' measured values. Obvious positive correlations existed among cochlear dimensions measured by ALPACA.

Conclusions and significance: The ALPACA method can be used to measure cochlear dimensions. Values obtained by the method demonstrate high reliability and consistency with a significant reduction in intra-observer variability compared to results from conventional MPR and manual 3D measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Extent of abscess development in cervical abscesses and pathogenic bacteria related to swallowing function. Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study. Improved intracochlear biopolymeric drug delivery system: an in vivo study. Case-control study of otoconia proteins otolin-1 and otoconin-90 in patients with Meniere's disease. Impact of fast-track on recurrence and malignant transformation of patients with inverted papilloma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1