患有 2 型糖尿病的老年人虚弱程度的地区差异:日本一项多中心横断面研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05223-7
Akiko Nishimura, Chie Masuda, Chiyo Murauchi, Miho Ishii, Yuko Murata, Terumi Kawasaki, Mayumi Azuma, Hidenori Arai, Shin-Ichi Harashima
{"title":"患有 2 型糖尿病的老年人虚弱程度的地区差异:日本一项多中心横断面研究。","authors":"Akiko Nishimura, Chie Masuda, Chiyo Murauchi, Miho Ishii, Yuko Murata, Terumi Kawasaki, Mayumi Azuma, Hidenori Arai, Shin-Ichi Harashima","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05223-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social environment may broadly impact multifaceted frailty; however, how environmental differences influence frailty in older adults with diabetes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate regional differences in frailty in urban and rural areas among older adults with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the frailty prevention program for older adults with diabetes study. Older adults aged 60-80 years who could independently perform basic activities of daily living (ADLs) were enrolled sequentially. Trained nurses obtained patient background, complications, body weight, body composition, blood tests, grip strength, frailty assessment, and self-care score results. Regional differences in frailty were evaluated using logistic and multiple linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 417 participants (269 urban and 148 rural). The prevalence of robustness was significantly lower in rural areas than in urban areas (29.7% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.018). Living in rural areas was associated with frailty (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-4.71) and pre-frailty (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.30-3.41). Lower instrumental ADL (B 0.28, standard error [SE] 0.073) and social ADL (B 0.265, SE 0.097) were characteristics of rural residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional differences in frailty were observed. Older adults with diabetes living in rural areas have a higher risk of frailty owing to a decline in instrumental and social ADLs. Social environment assessment and intervention programs that include communication strategies to enable care and social participation across environments are crucial to the effective and early prevention of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional differences in frailty among older adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Akiko Nishimura, Chie Masuda, Chiyo Murauchi, Miho Ishii, Yuko Murata, Terumi Kawasaki, Mayumi Azuma, Hidenori Arai, Shin-Ichi Harashima\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-024-05223-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social environment may broadly impact multifaceted frailty; however, how environmental differences influence frailty in older adults with diabetes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate regional differences in frailty in urban and rural areas among older adults with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the frailty prevention program for older adults with diabetes study. Older adults aged 60-80 years who could independently perform basic activities of daily living (ADLs) were enrolled sequentially. Trained nurses obtained patient background, complications, body weight, body composition, blood tests, grip strength, frailty assessment, and self-care score results. Regional differences in frailty were evaluated using logistic and multiple linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 417 participants (269 urban and 148 rural). The prevalence of robustness was significantly lower in rural areas than in urban areas (29.7% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.018). Living in rural areas was associated with frailty (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-4.71) and pre-frailty (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.30-3.41). Lower instrumental ADL (B 0.28, standard error [SE] 0.073) and social ADL (B 0.265, SE 0.097) were characteristics of rural residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional differences in frailty were observed. Older adults with diabetes living in rural areas have a higher risk of frailty owing to a decline in instrumental and social ADLs. Social environment assessment and intervention programs that include communication strategies to enable care and social participation across environments are crucial to the effective and early prevention of frailty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05223-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05223-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社会环境可能会对多方面的虚弱程度产生广泛影响;然而,环境差异如何影响糖尿病老年人的虚弱程度仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查城市和农村地区老年糖尿病患者虚弱程度的地区差异:这项横断面研究是老年糖尿病患者虚弱预防计划研究的一部分。年龄在 60-80 岁之间、能够独立完成基本日常生活活动(ADLs)的老年人按顺序被纳入研究。经过培训的护士负责了解患者的背景、并发症、体重、身体成分、血液检查、握力、虚弱程度评估和自我护理评分结果。采用逻辑和多元线性回归分析评估了虚弱程度的地区差异:这项研究包括 417 名参与者(269 名城市参与者和 148 名农村参与者)。农村地区的体弱患病率明显低于城市地区(29.7% 对 43.9%,p = 0.018)。居住在农村地区与虚弱(几率比 [OR] 2.55,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.38-4.71)和虚弱前期(OR 2.10,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.30-3.41)有关。工具性日常活动能力(B 0.28,标准误差 [SE] 0.073)和社交性日常活动能力(B 0.265,标准误差 0.097)较低是农村居民的特点:结论:虚弱程度存在地区差异。结论:观察到了虚弱的地区差异。居住在农村地区的老年糖尿病患者由于工具性和社会性 ADL 的下降而面临更高的虚弱风险。社会环境评估和干预计划包括沟通策略,以实现跨环境的护理和社会参与,这对有效和及早预防虚弱至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regional differences in frailty among older adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Japan.

Background: Social environment may broadly impact multifaceted frailty; however, how environmental differences influence frailty in older adults with diabetes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate regional differences in frailty in urban and rural areas among older adults with diabetes.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the frailty prevention program for older adults with diabetes study. Older adults aged 60-80 years who could independently perform basic activities of daily living (ADLs) were enrolled sequentially. Trained nurses obtained patient background, complications, body weight, body composition, blood tests, grip strength, frailty assessment, and self-care score results. Regional differences in frailty were evaluated using logistic and multiple linear regression analyses.

Results: This study included 417 participants (269 urban and 148 rural). The prevalence of robustness was significantly lower in rural areas than in urban areas (29.7% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.018). Living in rural areas was associated with frailty (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-4.71) and pre-frailty (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.30-3.41). Lower instrumental ADL (B 0.28, standard error [SE] 0.073) and social ADL (B 0.265, SE 0.097) were characteristics of rural residents.

Conclusions: Regional differences in frailty were observed. Older adults with diabetes living in rural areas have a higher risk of frailty owing to a decline in instrumental and social ADLs. Social environment assessment and intervention programs that include communication strategies to enable care and social participation across environments are crucial to the effective and early prevention of frailty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with the occupational balance in caregivers of people with dementia: A cross-sectional study from the ATENEA project. Mazor X robot-assisted upper and lower cervical pedicle screw fixation: a case report and literature review. Sociodemographic and health disparities in self-care difficulties among older individuals: Evidence from South Africa. Association of cognitive performance with overall, dosage, intensity, and domain physical activity in aging: NHANES 2011-2014. Validity and reliability of the TechPH scale in assessing Iranian older adults' attitudes toward technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1