[农村生活污水传统处理与源分离处理的碳排放比较]。

Q2 Environmental Science Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202309166
Rui Cao, Li Feng, Zi-Wen Du, Li-Qiu Zhang
{"title":"[农村生活污水传统处理与源分离处理的碳排放比较]。","authors":"Rui Cao, Li Feng, Zi-Wen Du, Li-Qiu Zhang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202309166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on the carbon emission accounting method for domestic sewage, combined with the current situation of rural domestic sewage treatment, the carbon emissions of traditional schemes and source separation schemes under the three scenarios of single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatments were calculated. The results showed that the net carbon emissions (calculated as CO<sub>2</sub>) of the single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatment traditional schemes were 1.21, 3.37, and 2.69 kg·m<sup>-3</sup>, respectively. The net carbon emissions (calculated as CO<sub>2</sub>) of the single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatments in source separation schemes were -0.50, -0.04, and -0.54 kg·m<sup>-3</sup>, respectively, achieving zero or even negative carbon emissions. The direct and indirect carbon emissions of the source separation scheme were lower than those of the traditional scheme under all three scenarios. The carbon compensation measures in the source separation scheme mainly came from the land use of urine after storage and treatment. By separating blackwater from graywater at the source, the Source Separation Program achieved resource utilization of highly concentrated pollutants in blackwater, reducing emissions while generating significant carbon offsets. Therefore, efforts should be made to promote the separation and treatment of rural domestic sewage sources, improve the utilization rate of rural domestic sewage resources, and achieve green and low-carbon development of rural domestic sewage treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of Carbon Emissions from Traditional Treatment and Source Separation Treatment of Rural Domestic Sewage].\",\"authors\":\"Rui Cao, Li Feng, Zi-Wen Du, Li-Qiu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202309166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Based on the carbon emission accounting method for domestic sewage, combined with the current situation of rural domestic sewage treatment, the carbon emissions of traditional schemes and source separation schemes under the three scenarios of single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatments were calculated. The results showed that the net carbon emissions (calculated as CO<sub>2</sub>) of the single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatment traditional schemes were 1.21, 3.37, and 2.69 kg·m<sup>-3</sup>, respectively. The net carbon emissions (calculated as CO<sub>2</sub>) of the single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatments in source separation schemes were -0.50, -0.04, and -0.54 kg·m<sup>-3</sup>, respectively, achieving zero or even negative carbon emissions. The direct and indirect carbon emissions of the source separation scheme were lower than those of the traditional scheme under all three scenarios. The carbon compensation measures in the source separation scheme mainly came from the land use of urine after storage and treatment. By separating blackwater from graywater at the source, the Source Separation Program achieved resource utilization of highly concentrated pollutants in blackwater, reducing emissions while generating significant carbon offsets. Therefore, efforts should be made to promote the separation and treatment of rural domestic sewage sources, improve the utilization rate of rural domestic sewage resources, and achieve green and low-carbon development of rural domestic sewage treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202309166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202309166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据生活污水碳排放核算方法,结合农村生活污水处理现状,计算了单户处理、多户处理和管道处理三种情况下传统方案和源分离方案的碳排放量。结果表明,单户处理、多户处理和管道处理三种方案的净碳排放量(以 CO2)分别为 1.21、3.37 和 2.69 kg-m-3。单户、多户和管道处理传统方案的碳净排放量(以 CO2 计)分别为 1.21、3.37 和 2.69 kg-m-3。分别为-0.50、-0.04 和-0.54 kg-m-3,实现了零碳排放甚至负碳排放。在所有三个方案中,源头分离方案的直接和间接碳排放量均低于传统方案。源头分离方案中的碳补偿措施主要来自尿液储存和处理后的土地利用。源头分离方案通过从源头分离黑水和灰水,实现了黑水中高浓度污染物的资源化利用,在减排的同时产生了大量的碳补偿。因此,应大力推进农村生活污水源头分离处理,提高农村生活污水资源化利用率,实现农村生活污水处理绿色低碳发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Comparison of Carbon Emissions from Traditional Treatment and Source Separation Treatment of Rural Domestic Sewage].

Based on the carbon emission accounting method for domestic sewage, combined with the current situation of rural domestic sewage treatment, the carbon emissions of traditional schemes and source separation schemes under the three scenarios of single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatments were calculated. The results showed that the net carbon emissions (calculated as CO2) of the single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatment traditional schemes were 1.21, 3.37, and 2.69 kg·m-3, respectively. The net carbon emissions (calculated as CO2) of the single household, multi-household, and pipeline treatments in source separation schemes were -0.50, -0.04, and -0.54 kg·m-3, respectively, achieving zero or even negative carbon emissions. The direct and indirect carbon emissions of the source separation scheme were lower than those of the traditional scheme under all three scenarios. The carbon compensation measures in the source separation scheme mainly came from the land use of urine after storage and treatment. By separating blackwater from graywater at the source, the Source Separation Program achieved resource utilization of highly concentrated pollutants in blackwater, reducing emissions while generating significant carbon offsets. Therefore, efforts should be made to promote the separation and treatment of rural domestic sewage sources, improve the utilization rate of rural domestic sewage resources, and achieve green and low-carbon development of rural domestic sewage treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊最新文献
[Source and Influencing Factor Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals Based on PMF Model and GeoDetector]. [Spatial and Temporal Changes in Habitat Quality and Driving Forces in Typical Loess Hill and Gully Areas:A Case Study of the Zuli River Basin]. [A Method for Fine Mapping of Carbon Emissions from Regional Land Use Change and Its Application]. [Analysis of Spatial Distribution of Ecosystem Services and Driving Factors in Northeast China]. [Analysis of Spatiotemporal Differences and Influencing Factors of Land Use Carbon Emissions in Ningxia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1