肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症患者对辅助机械臂的期望和体验:一项多中心观察研究。

Susanne Spittel, Thomas Meyer, Ute Weyen, Torsten Grehl, Patrick Weydt, Robert Steinbach, Susanne Petri, Petra Baum, Moritz Metelmann, Anne-Dorte Sperfeld, Dagmar Kettemann, Jenny Norden, Annekathrin Rödiger, Benjamin Ilse, Julian Grosskreutz, Barbara Hildebrandt, Bertram Walter, Christoph Münch, André Maier
{"title":"肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症患者对辅助机械臂的期望和体验:一项多中心观察研究。","authors":"Susanne Spittel, Thomas Meyer, Ute Weyen, Torsten Grehl, Patrick Weydt, Robert Steinbach, Susanne Petri, Petra Baum, Moritz Metelmann, Anne-Dorte Sperfeld, Dagmar Kettemann, Jenny Norden, Annekathrin Rödiger, Benjamin Ilse, Julian Grosskreutz, Barbara Hildebrandt, Bertram Walter, Christoph Münch, André Maier","doi":"10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Robotic arms are innovative assistive devices for ALS patients with progressive motor deficits of arms and hands. The objective was to explore the patients´ expectations towards a robotic arm system and to assess the actual experiences after the provision of the device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted at 9 ALS centers in Germany. ALS-related functional deficits were assessed using the ALS-Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). Motor deficit of the upper limbs was determined using a subscore of three arm-related items of the ALSFRS-R (items 4-6; range 0-12 points). User expectations before provision (expectation group, n = 85) and user experiences after provision (experience group, n = 14) with the device (JACO Assistive Robotic Device, Kinova, Boisbriand, QC, Canada) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total cohort, mean ALSFRS-R subscore for arm function was 1.7 (SD: 2.0, 0-9) demonstrating a severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. In the expectation group (n = 85), the following use cases of the robotic arm have been prioritized: handling objects (89%), close-body movements (88%), pressing buttons (87%), serving drinks (86%), and opening cabinets and doors (85%). In the experience group (n = 14), handling objects (79%), serving drinks (79%), near-body movements (71%), pushing buttons (71%), serving food (64%), and opening doors (64%) were the most frequent used cases. Most patients used the device daily (71.4%, n = 10), and 28.6% (n = 4) several times a week. All patients of the experience group found the device helpful, felt safe while using the device, and were satisfied with its reliability. NPS of the assistive robotic arm revealed 64% \"promoters\" (strong recommendation), 29% \"indifferents\" (uncertain recommendation) and 7% \"detractors\" (no recommendation). Total NPS was + 57 demonstrating strong patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initiation of procurement with a robotic assistive arm was confined to patients with severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. User experience underlined the wide spectrum of use cases of assistive robotic arms in ALS. The positive user experience together with high satisfaction underscore that robotic arm systems serve as a valuable treatment option in ALS patients with severe motor deficits of the arms.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User expectations and experiences of an assistive robotic arm in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a multicenter observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Spittel, Thomas Meyer, Ute Weyen, Torsten Grehl, Patrick Weydt, Robert Steinbach, Susanne Petri, Petra Baum, Moritz Metelmann, Anne-Dorte Sperfeld, Dagmar Kettemann, Jenny Norden, Annekathrin Rödiger, Benjamin Ilse, Julian Grosskreutz, Barbara Hildebrandt, Bertram Walter, Christoph Münch, André Maier\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Robotic arms are innovative assistive devices for ALS patients with progressive motor deficits of arms and hands. The objective was to explore the patients´ expectations towards a robotic arm system and to assess the actual experiences after the provision of the device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted at 9 ALS centers in Germany. ALS-related functional deficits were assessed using the ALS-Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). Motor deficit of the upper limbs was determined using a subscore of three arm-related items of the ALSFRS-R (items 4-6; range 0-12 points). User expectations before provision (expectation group, n = 85) and user experiences after provision (experience group, n = 14) with the device (JACO Assistive Robotic Device, Kinova, Boisbriand, QC, Canada) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total cohort, mean ALSFRS-R subscore for arm function was 1.7 (SD: 2.0, 0-9) demonstrating a severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. In the expectation group (n = 85), the following use cases of the robotic arm have been prioritized: handling objects (89%), close-body movements (88%), pressing buttons (87%), serving drinks (86%), and opening cabinets and doors (85%). In the experience group (n = 14), handling objects (79%), serving drinks (79%), near-body movements (71%), pushing buttons (71%), serving food (64%), and opening doors (64%) were the most frequent used cases. Most patients used the device daily (71.4%, n = 10), and 28.6% (n = 4) several times a week. All patients of the experience group found the device helpful, felt safe while using the device, and were satisfied with its reliability. NPS of the assistive robotic arm revealed 64% \\\"promoters\\\" (strong recommendation), 29% \\\"indifferents\\\" (uncertain recommendation) and 7% \\\"detractors\\\" (no recommendation). Total NPS was + 57 demonstrating strong patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initiation of procurement with a robotic assistive arm was confined to patients with severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. User experience underlined the wide spectrum of use cases of assistive robotic arms in ALS. The positive user experience together with high satisfaction underscore that robotic arm systems serve as a valuable treatment option in ALS patients with severe motor deficits of the arms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological research and practice\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机械臂是一种创新型辅助设备,适用于手臂和手部进行性运动障碍的 ALS 患者。研究目的是探讨患者对机械臂系统的期望,并评估患者在使用该设备后的实际体验:在德国的 9 个 ALS 中心开展了一项前瞻性观察研究。采用 ALS 功能评定量表修订版(ALSFRS-R)评估与 ALS 相关的功能障碍。上肢的运动障碍通过 ALSFRS-R 中与手臂相关的三个项目(项目 4-6;范围 0-12 分)的子分数来确定。评估了用户在使用该装置(JACO辅助机器人装置,Kinova公司,加拿大Boisbriand市)前的期望值(期望值组,n = 85)和使用该装置后的体验(体验组,n = 14):在所有组别中,平均 ALSFRS-R 手臂功能子评分为 1.7(标准差:2.0,0-9),表明上肢功能严重不足。在期望组(n = 85)中,机器人手臂的优先使用情况如下:搬运物品(89%)、近身运动(88%)、按键(87%)、提供饮料(86%)以及打开橱柜和门(85%)。在经验组(n = 14)中,最常使用的情况是搬运物体(79%)、端饮料(79%)、近身动作(71%)、按按钮(71%)、端食物(64%)和开门(64%)。大多数患者每天使用该装置(71.4%,n = 10),28.6%(n = 4)每周使用数次。体验组的所有患者都认为该装置很有用,使用时感觉安全,并对其可靠性感到满意。辅助机械臂的 NPS 显示,64% 为 "推荐者"(强烈推荐),29% 为 "无所谓者"(不确定推荐),7% 为 "反对者"(不推荐)。总的 NPS 为 + 57,表明患者非常满意:结论:使用机器人辅助臂的患者仅限于上肢功能严重受损的患者。用户体验强调了辅助机械臂在 ALS 中的广泛用途。积极的用户体验和较高的满意度突出表明,机械臂系统对于手臂运动功能严重缺失的 ALS 患者来说是一种有价值的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
User expectations and experiences of an assistive robotic arm in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a multicenter observational study.

Objective: Robotic arms are innovative assistive devices for ALS patients with progressive motor deficits of arms and hands. The objective was to explore the patients´ expectations towards a robotic arm system and to assess the actual experiences after the provision of the device.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at 9 ALS centers in Germany. ALS-related functional deficits were assessed using the ALS-Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). Motor deficit of the upper limbs was determined using a subscore of three arm-related items of the ALSFRS-R (items 4-6; range 0-12 points). User expectations before provision (expectation group, n = 85) and user experiences after provision (experience group, n = 14) with the device (JACO Assistive Robotic Device, Kinova, Boisbriand, QC, Canada) were assessed.

Results: In the total cohort, mean ALSFRS-R subscore for arm function was 1.7 (SD: 2.0, 0-9) demonstrating a severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. In the expectation group (n = 85), the following use cases of the robotic arm have been prioritized: handling objects (89%), close-body movements (88%), pressing buttons (87%), serving drinks (86%), and opening cabinets and doors (85%). In the experience group (n = 14), handling objects (79%), serving drinks (79%), near-body movements (71%), pushing buttons (71%), serving food (64%), and opening doors (64%) were the most frequent used cases. Most patients used the device daily (71.4%, n = 10), and 28.6% (n = 4) several times a week. All patients of the experience group found the device helpful, felt safe while using the device, and were satisfied with its reliability. NPS of the assistive robotic arm revealed 64% "promoters" (strong recommendation), 29% "indifferents" (uncertain recommendation) and 7% "detractors" (no recommendation). Total NPS was + 57 demonstrating strong patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: Initiation of procurement with a robotic assistive arm was confined to patients with severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. User experience underlined the wide spectrum of use cases of assistive robotic arms in ALS. The positive user experience together with high satisfaction underscore that robotic arm systems serve as a valuable treatment option in ALS patients with severe motor deficits of the arms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ischemia/reperfusion injury in acute human and experimental stroke: focus on thrombo-inflammatory mechanisms and treatments. Letter to the editor in response to Professor Josef Finsterer. MS brain health quality standards: a survey on the reality in clinical practice in Germany. Chikungunya-related Guillain-Barre syndrome is most commonly demyelinating and affects multiple cranial nerves. Prevalence of comorbid autoimmune diseases and antibodies in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1