言出必行:管理层回应酒店客人评论时的具体语言与抽象语言

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Tourism Management Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105032
Chunyu Li , Yiheng Yu , Raffaele Filieri , Geng Cui
{"title":"言出必行:管理层回应酒店客人评论时的具体语言与抽象语言","authors":"Chunyu Li ,&nbsp;Yiheng Yu ,&nbsp;Raffaele Filieri ,&nbsp;Geng Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hospitality managers increasingly respond to hotel guest reviews to achieve customer satisfaction and cultivate customer relationships. Conventional wisdom suggests that concrete language is more effective in customer service encounters. However, little is known whether, when and why abstract <em>versus</em> concrete management response is more effective in achieving customer satisfaction. We adopt a mixed-method approach with a big data study based on a sample of 1,253,668 reviews from 2306 hotels and two scenario-based laboratory experiments. We show that abstract (<em>versus</em> concrete) management response fosters greater customer satisfaction when it addresses positive (<em>versus</em> negative) reviews or is from a senior manager (<em>versus</em> junior staff). When responding to positive (<em>versus</em> negative) reviews or issued by a senior manager (<em>versus</em> junior staff), the abstract (<em>versus</em> concrete) response enhances customers’ perceived warmth (<em>versus</em> perceived competence). Our findings provide meaningful guidelines for the hospitality and tourism industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48469,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Management","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 105032"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517724001511/pdfft?md5=e7ec51d9bb7f4b48df6a28fd9c80380e&pid=1-s2.0-S0261517724001511-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All words have consequences: Concrete versus abstract language in management response to hotel guest reviews\",\"authors\":\"Chunyu Li ,&nbsp;Yiheng Yu ,&nbsp;Raffaele Filieri ,&nbsp;Geng Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hospitality managers increasingly respond to hotel guest reviews to achieve customer satisfaction and cultivate customer relationships. Conventional wisdom suggests that concrete language is more effective in customer service encounters. However, little is known whether, when and why abstract <em>versus</em> concrete management response is more effective in achieving customer satisfaction. We adopt a mixed-method approach with a big data study based on a sample of 1,253,668 reviews from 2306 hotels and two scenario-based laboratory experiments. We show that abstract (<em>versus</em> concrete) management response fosters greater customer satisfaction when it addresses positive (<em>versus</em> negative) reviews or is from a senior manager (<em>versus</em> junior staff). When responding to positive (<em>versus</em> negative) reviews or issued by a senior manager (<em>versus</em> junior staff), the abstract (<em>versus</em> concrete) response enhances customers’ perceived warmth (<em>versus</em> perceived competence). Our findings provide meaningful guidelines for the hospitality and tourism industry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tourism Management\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517724001511/pdfft?md5=e7ec51d9bb7f4b48df6a28fd9c80380e&pid=1-s2.0-S0261517724001511-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tourism Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517724001511\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517724001511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酒店管理者越来越多地回应酒店客人的评论,以获得客户满意度并培养客户关系。传统观念认为,具体的语言在客户服务中更为有效。然而,抽象与具体的管理回应是否、何时以及为何能更有效地达到客户满意度,却鲜为人知。我们采用了一种混合方法,即基于 2306 家酒店 1,253,668 条评论样本的大数据研究和两个基于场景的实验室实验。我们的研究表明,当管理层针对正面(相对于负面)评论做出抽象(相对于具体)回应时,或者当高层管理人员(相对于基层员工)做出回应时,顾客满意度会更高。当回应正面(相对于负面)评价或由高级经理(相对于初级员工)发出时,抽象(相对于具体)的回应会增强顾客的热情感知(相对于能力感知)。我们的研究结果为酒店和旅游业提供了有意义的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
All words have consequences: Concrete versus abstract language in management response to hotel guest reviews

Hospitality managers increasingly respond to hotel guest reviews to achieve customer satisfaction and cultivate customer relationships. Conventional wisdom suggests that concrete language is more effective in customer service encounters. However, little is known whether, when and why abstract versus concrete management response is more effective in achieving customer satisfaction. We adopt a mixed-method approach with a big data study based on a sample of 1,253,668 reviews from 2306 hotels and two scenario-based laboratory experiments. We show that abstract (versus concrete) management response fosters greater customer satisfaction when it addresses positive (versus negative) reviews or is from a senior manager (versus junior staff). When responding to positive (versus negative) reviews or issued by a senior manager (versus junior staff), the abstract (versus concrete) response enhances customers’ perceived warmth (versus perceived competence). Our findings provide meaningful guidelines for the hospitality and tourism industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tourism Management
Tourism Management Multiple-
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
190
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Tourism Management, the preeminent scholarly journal, concentrates on the comprehensive management aspects, encompassing planning and policy, within the realm of travel and tourism. Adopting an interdisciplinary perspective, the journal delves into international, national, and regional tourism, addressing various management challenges. Its content mirrors this integrative approach, featuring primary research articles, progress in tourism research, case studies, research notes, discussions on current issues, and book reviews. Emphasizing scholarly rigor, all published papers are expected to contribute to theoretical and/or methodological advancements while offering specific insights relevant to tourism management and policy.
期刊最新文献
To vote or not to vote? The impact of gratitude expression on helpfulness voting in peer-to-peer accommodation reviews AI-generated imagery in sustainable gastronomy tourism: A study from bottom-up to top-down processing Nature and adventure tourism rarely generate awe or pro-environmental behaviours: Conceptual and methodological rejoinder Digital nudging for sustainable tourist behavior in new media Construal level theory and online reviews: A search stage perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1