破裂与未破裂前循环动脉瘤手术治疗后的结果

George Fotakopoulos, Charalabos Gatos, Grigorios Christodoulidis, Ourania Fotakopoulou, Kostas N Fountas
{"title":"破裂与未破裂前循环动脉瘤手术治疗后的结果","authors":"George Fotakopoulos, Charalabos Gatos, Grigorios Christodoulidis, Ourania Fotakopoulou, Kostas N Fountas","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2024.19.2.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present article aimed to review the safety and the clinical and radiological outcomes of clipped ruptured and unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study investigated the relative articles involving the outcome after surgical management of ruptures versus unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms through electronic databases from January 1980 to January 2023. The primary outcomes were mortality and modified Rankin scale (mRS) >3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information on mRS >3 was found in six articles totalizing 2096 patients, of whom 130 subjects had ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Data about mortality was provided by eight studies totalizing 2454 participants, of whom 140 subjects had ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current meta-analysis indicates that surgical clipping is a safe procedure for both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of anterior circulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Outcome after Surgical Management of Ruptured Versus Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"George Fotakopoulos, Charalabos Gatos, Grigorios Christodoulidis, Ourania Fotakopoulou, Kostas N Fountas\",\"doi\":\"10.26574/maedica.2024.19.2.221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present article aimed to review the safety and the clinical and radiological outcomes of clipped ruptured and unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study investigated the relative articles involving the outcome after surgical management of ruptures versus unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms through electronic databases from January 1980 to January 2023. The primary outcomes were mortality and modified Rankin scale (mRS) >3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information on mRS >3 was found in six articles totalizing 2096 patients, of whom 130 subjects had ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Data about mortality was provided by eight studies totalizing 2454 participants, of whom 140 subjects had ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current meta-analysis indicates that surgical clipping is a safe procedure for both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of anterior circulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maedica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345057/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2024.19.2.221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2024.19.2.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文旨在回顾剪除破裂和未破裂前循环动脉瘤的安全性以及临床和放射学结果:研究通过电子数据库调查了1980年1月至2023年1月期间涉及前循环动脉瘤破裂与未破裂手术治疗后结果的相关文章。主要结果为死亡率和改良Rankin量表(mRS)>3:结果:在六篇文章中发现了有关 mRS >3 的信息,共涉及 2096 名患者,其中 130 名患者患有破裂和未破裂动脉瘤。8项研究共2454名参与者提供了死亡率数据,其中140名受试者患有破裂和未破裂动脉瘤:目前的荟萃分析表明,对于前循环破裂和未破裂的动脉瘤,手术切除都是一种安全的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Outcome after Surgical Management of Ruptured Versus Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms.

Objectives: The present article aimed to review the safety and the clinical and radiological outcomes of clipped ruptured and unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.

Materials and methods: The study investigated the relative articles involving the outcome after surgical management of ruptures versus unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms through electronic databases from January 1980 to January 2023. The primary outcomes were mortality and modified Rankin scale (mRS) >3.

Results: Information on mRS >3 was found in six articles totalizing 2096 patients, of whom 130 subjects had ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Data about mortality was provided by eight studies totalizing 2454 participants, of whom 140 subjects had ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.

Conclusions: The current meta-analysis indicates that surgical clipping is a safe procedure for both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of anterior circulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-Dose or Low-Dose Corticosteroids - Which Regimen is More Effective in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19? A Retrospective Study. Histological Chorioamnionitis - Experience from a Tertiary Care Center. Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Waitlisted Preoperative General Surgical Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India - Problems and Probable Solutions: an Observational Study. Improvement of Mucoid Impaction with Dupilumab in a Severe Asthma Patient. Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) after COVID-19 Vaccination: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1