玻璃体视网膜手术后视网膜毒性评估:使用 Diopsys® NOVA™ 对硅油和全氟丙烷填塞法进行比较。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Current Eye Research Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1080/02713683.2024.2394118
Sadık Altan Ozal, Murat Karapapak, Ece Ozal, Serhat Ermis, Serkan Guler, Hakan Baybora, Serife Ciloglu Hayat, Yusuf Cem Yılmaz
{"title":"玻璃体视网膜手术后视网膜毒性评估:使用 Diopsys® NOVA™ 对硅油和全氟丙烷填塞法进行比较。","authors":"Sadık Altan Ozal, Murat Karapapak, Ece Ozal, Serhat Ermis, Serkan Guler, Hakan Baybora, Serife Ciloglu Hayat, Yusuf Cem Yılmaz","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2024.2394118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare the retinal toxicity associated with silicone oil (SO) and perfluoropropane (C3F8) tamponade following vitreoretinal surgery for fresh rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), utilizing the office-based Diopsys<sup>®</sup> NOVA<sup>™</sup> system for evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for fresh RRD and had SO (group 1) or C3F8 (group 2) tamponade were included in a prospective analysis. Flicker full field electroretinography (ffERG) and pattern electroretinography (PERG) tests were performed at 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative best corrected visual acuity (logMAR) was significantly different in group 1 and group 2 patients, 0.48 ± 0.3 and 0.30 ± 0.2, respectively. No significant disparities were found in demographic variables. Flicker ffERG and PERG recordings revealed notable alterations in retinal function parameters in the group 1 compared to the group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a correlation between SO tamponade and retinal dysfunction, evidenced by office-based ERG measurements. The Diopsys<sup>®</sup> NOVA<sup>™</sup> protocol offers clinical ease in assessing retinal function. Further controlled studies are essential to validate these findings and guide clinical practice effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retinal Toxicity Assessment Following Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Comparison of Silicone Oil and Perfluoropropane Tamponade Using Diopsys<sup>®</sup> NOVA<sup>™</sup>.\",\"authors\":\"Sadık Altan Ozal, Murat Karapapak, Ece Ozal, Serhat Ermis, Serkan Guler, Hakan Baybora, Serife Ciloglu Hayat, Yusuf Cem Yılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02713683.2024.2394118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare the retinal toxicity associated with silicone oil (SO) and perfluoropropane (C3F8) tamponade following vitreoretinal surgery for fresh rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), utilizing the office-based Diopsys<sup>®</sup> NOVA<sup>™</sup> system for evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for fresh RRD and had SO (group 1) or C3F8 (group 2) tamponade were included in a prospective analysis. Flicker full field electroretinography (ffERG) and pattern electroretinography (PERG) tests were performed at 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative best corrected visual acuity (logMAR) was significantly different in group 1 and group 2 patients, 0.48 ± 0.3 and 0.30 ± 0.2, respectively. No significant disparities were found in demographic variables. Flicker ffERG and PERG recordings revealed notable alterations in retinal function parameters in the group 1 compared to the group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a correlation between SO tamponade and retinal dysfunction, evidenced by office-based ERG measurements. The Diopsys<sup>®</sup> NOVA<sup>™</sup> protocol offers clinical ease in assessing retinal function. Further controlled studies are essential to validate these findings and guide clinical practice effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2394118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2394118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估和比较新鲜流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)玻璃体视网膜手术后与硅油(SO)和全氟丙烷(C3F8)填塞相关的视网膜毒性,采用基于诊室的 Diopsys® NOVA™ 系统进行评估:方法:前瞻性分析纳入了因新鲜RRD而接受玻璃体视网膜手术且有SO(第1组)或C3F8(第2组)填塞的患者。术后6个月进行闪烁全场视网膜电图(ffERG)和模式视网膜电图(PERG)测试:结果:第一组和第二组患者的术后最佳矫正视力(logMAR)有显著差异,分别为 0.48 ± 0.3 和 0.30 ± 0.2。人口统计学变量无明显差异。闪烁 ffERG 和 PERG 记录显示,与第 2 组相比,第 1 组患者的视网膜功能参数发生了明显变化:我们的研究结果表明,SO 填塞与视网膜功能障碍之间存在相关性,办公室ERG 测量结果就是证明。Diopsys® NOVA™ 方案为临床评估视网膜功能提供了便利。进一步的对照研究对验证这些发现和有效指导临床实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retinal Toxicity Assessment Following Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Comparison of Silicone Oil and Perfluoropropane Tamponade Using Diopsys® NOVA.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess and compare the retinal toxicity associated with silicone oil (SO) and perfluoropropane (C3F8) tamponade following vitreoretinal surgery for fresh rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), utilizing the office-based Diopsys® NOVA system for evaluation.

Methods: Patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for fresh RRD and had SO (group 1) or C3F8 (group 2) tamponade were included in a prospective analysis. Flicker full field electroretinography (ffERG) and pattern electroretinography (PERG) tests were performed at 6 months postoperatively.

Results: Postoperative best corrected visual acuity (logMAR) was significantly different in group 1 and group 2 patients, 0.48 ± 0.3 and 0.30 ± 0.2, respectively. No significant disparities were found in demographic variables. Flicker ffERG and PERG recordings revealed notable alterations in retinal function parameters in the group 1 compared to the group 2.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a correlation between SO tamponade and retinal dysfunction, evidenced by office-based ERG measurements. The Diopsys® NOVA protocol offers clinical ease in assessing retinal function. Further controlled studies are essential to validate these findings and guide clinical practice effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Four-Year Longitudinal Investigation of the Relationship Between Myopia and Retinal Shape in Chinese Children: The Anyang Childhood Eye Study. The Potential Role of Exosomes in Ocular Surface and Lacrimal Gland Regeneration. Visual Acuity and Refractive Status in Congenital Macular Coloboma. Radiological Imaging of the Lacrimal Gland in Sjogren's Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Changes in Posterior Ocular Structures in Individuals Using Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1